User talk:Majavic

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Majavic. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 01:37, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 01:45, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. MrOllie (talk) 14:19, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The phrase added is not promotional. A research published in Nature Photonics is being added, which definitely has impact (check altmetric, and news) on current researches both on quantum photonics and overall science.

Also, silicon nitride and quantum well laser is used to make such a waveguide for quantum applications for the very first time. Please be educated first and know the impact of the research before your comments. Majavic (talk) 18:04, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Though I work for University media and not directly related, clearly a paper published in Nature should be added to relevant Wikipedia pages. I have several such examples where authors him/herselves added their article and not deleted by the Wikipedia. Most importantly, the added information clearly enhances the information content and value of the Wikipedia page. Kindly review the information added with an expert, without deleting it blindly. Majavic (talk) 18:07, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:PAID. You are in violation of Wikipedia's terms of use. Wikipedia is not a place to promote your university or the people who work there, not even by adding citations to their work in Nature. If other people have violated our policies and gotten away with it, that isn't a reason for you to do the same. MrOllie (talk) 18:09, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So who should update it if its a relevant information? Wikipedia has the responsibility to upload useful information. Kindly check that and update if you are a moderator. Majavic (talk) 18:14, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide me an explanation. Majavic (talk) 23:26, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia doesn't have a responsibility to help you promote your university. The answer is that no one should add this information. MrOllie (talk) 01:27, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]