User talk:Mailrecordings

Welcome!

Hello, Mailrecordings, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Draft:Martin Nusspaumer, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Best practices for editors with close associations
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! GPL93 (talk) 01:04, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GLP93! I understand you may have some automatic filters that go with my ip address, which is OK. I'm not related to the subject so please help me out to publish the biography. I appreciate your help. Best,Mailrecordings (talk) 01:16, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:PAID and make further declaration. I am about to duplicate this one line with a formal message lower down on your talk page. I suggest the declaration follows that message. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:29, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not paid to write this article!! I can see how difficult it is to write something on this platform. Also it seems, by your comments, that you are not familiar on how to measure how significant of a career a performer has. In my opinion we need to list the places, orchestras, opera houses or theaters. I think that is a way of validating a performer, not just with articles but with actual performances. Anyway, I hope you agree with my opinion. Mailrecordings (talk) 22:44, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply.

Yes, it is extremely hard to write articles here. While I respect your opinion, that is not the way Wikipedia works.

For a living person we have a high standard of referencing. Every substantive fact you assert, especially one that is susceptible to potential challenge, requires a citation with a reference that is about them, and is independent of them, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS, and is significant coverage. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact cited, that meet these tough criteria is likely to make this draft a clear acceptance (0.9 probability). Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the person is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today.

I will note your reply below the formal question 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 06:23, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin Nusspaumer (July 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by InterstellarGamer12321 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is a WP:BLP article, so all statements and claims should be backed up with inline citations to reliable sources. The Education and recognition and Personal life sections are both currently completely unsourced. Inline citations to reliable sources should be added and unverifiable information should be removed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Martin Nusspaumer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 17:56, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mailrecordings! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 17:56, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin Nusspaumer (August 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You have failed to demonstrate notability.Your references document that he exists and has appeared in performances, but show nothing of note yet.

Your draft says "possessing star potential,..." which means it does not yet exist. Thus my conclusion is that this is WP:TOOSOON in his career.

Additionally please do not provide lists of performances nor lists of where he has been soloist. We are interested only in what is said about him' in significant coverage in multiple reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Martin Nusspaumer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:07, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello Mailrecordings. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mailrecordings. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Mailrecordings|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:30, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In this diff the editor has declared that they are not compensated to write articles here 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 06:24, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have stated elsewhere that you are the professional photographs who has uploaded a picture of Martin Nusspaumer, please declare the character of your relationship with him. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 06:26, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have any type of relationship. I aim to spotlight opera singers that are not in Wikipedia and certainly deserve a place here, that's it. Thanks for your help and time. Mailrecordings (talk) 15:48, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How was your company the professional photographer for the picture ofMartin Nusspaumer please? There is clearly some form of relationship. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:46, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I took some of his headshots. I have taken photos of many opera singers since I started. That would be the only "relationship" I could think of. Mailrecordings (talk) 18:19, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:00, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin Nusspaumer (September 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please carefully read WP:PEACOCK and WP:NPOV and re-write.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Martin Nusspaumer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 16:24, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin Nusspaumer (September 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You still have tone issues, emphasis mine:

"Nusspaumer's musical journey has seen him perform as a soloist with renowned orchestras and opera companies worldwide. He has showcased his "creamy, cultivated lyric tenor" that effortlessly rides over full orchestra and chorus[4]. His performances have drawn accolades for his powerful top notes and virile singing, earning him a reputation as a tenor with a clarion top notes"

"Nusspaumer's repertoire includes major roles in renowned operas such"

"distinguished mezzo-soprano María Antúnez"

These types of words are inappropriate for an encyclopaedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Martin Nusspaumer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 16:35, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank so much for your review! I will take those words out, but how about the words that are taken from articles? Mailrecordings (talk) 16:37, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry- I don't get notified in replies from this template unless I am WP:PINGed. I have made some edits to the draft, hopefully you can see the difference its made to the vaguely promotional tone, and accepted it. Please add some WP:CATEGORIES. Qcne (talk) 21:26, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin Nusspaumer has been accepted

Martin Nusspaumer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 21:26, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]