Jump to content

User talk:M Cedric Pimenta

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:15, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, M Cedric Pimenta! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:15, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 16:14, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mario Pimenta M Cedric Pimenta (talk) 10:14, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

[edit]
Information icon

Hello M Cedric Pimenta. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:M Cedric Pimenta. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=M Cedric Pimenta|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:17, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not getting,I am just trying to write best article and making necessary changes M Cedric Pimenta (talk) 10:44, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i am not getting paid M Cedric Pimenta (talk) 10:44, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your draft says "Media Coordinator: Mario Pimenta" – do they not pay you for your efforts? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:32, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's just a position in college.
I saw a article about Waves,a bits Goa cultural festival so I decided to replicate it for myself.Even the position is left less than a week,before I lose it.I want to show to make it.I am trying my best to make it neutral,I citied local news for authentic information also M Cedric Pimenta (talk) 13:48, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
also can you point out what makes it sound advertise,the event has already over.
Also which references don't work
All of them are genuine local digital news websites M Cedric Pimenta (talk) 14:09, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/M Cedric Pimenta. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 21:27, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Filmbuster (June 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: No indication of notability. Sources are primary and/or non-independent (including several copies of the same press release) and for a one-off local event such as this there would have to be multiple secondary sources providing significant coverage of the event.

In addition, the draft is written in a very promotional tone. That could be fixed by editing the text, but the lack of notability can't.

bonadea contributions talk 13:59, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]