Jump to content

User talk:M.Caban/Edit Wikipedia Labor Unions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
♦ Edit Wikipedia: Labor Union♦

M.Caban (talk) 01:43, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

..................... Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student reviewer **Replace with username for version on talk page** Wikipedia User:SRampersaud
Date of review 4/30/2013
Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page** Wikipedia User: M.Caban
URL of editor’s Userpage http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:M.Caban/Edit_Wikipedia_Labor_Unions&action=edit
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 4/30/2013
Date review submitted to instructor 4/30/2013
Length of edit (too long/too short) Exceeds requirement
Image (needed/appropriate) image not needed
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) The information provided was accurate from the text book
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) The article information was relevant to I/O Psych topic and added information was accurate from the text.
Wikiformatting N/A
Grammar & composition None
Other comments Good job.


......................................... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.189.145.34 (talk) 02:51, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Name of student reviewer Wikipedia User: Aaleksanian
Date of review 4/26/2013
Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page** Wikipedia User: M.Caban
URL of editor’s Userpage http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:M.Caban/Edit_Wikipedia_Labor_Unions&action=edit
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 04/26/13
Date review submitted to instructor 04/26/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) Good length
Image (needed/appropriate) Image might raise your grade.
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Very accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) N/A
Wikiformatting External link was good
Grammar & composition Good job
Other comments none



Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student reviewer **Replace with username for version on talk page** Wikipedia User:CRamel16
Date of review 5/1/2013
Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page** Wikipedia User: M.Caban
URL of editor’s Userpage http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:M.Caban/Edit_Wikipedia_Labor_Unions&action=edit
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 5/1/2013
Date review submitted to instructor 5/1/2013
Length of edit (too long/too short) Meets requirements
Image (needed/appropriate) image not needed
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) The information provided was accurate straight from the text book
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) The article information was relevant to I/O Psych topic and added information was accurate from the text.
Wikiformatting N/A
Grammar & composition None
Other comments Perfect.


Name of student reviewer **Replace with username for version on talk page** Wikipedia User:Fernando18
Date of review 5/1/2013
Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page** Wikipedia User: M.Caban
URL of editor’s Userpage http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:M.Caban/Edit_Wikipedia_Labor_Unions
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 5/1/13
Date review submitted to instructor 5/1/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) Good length
Image (needed/appropriate) need a image if possible
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Very accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed Primary
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Good article and topic
Wikiformatting yes good bullet points
Grammar & composition None
Other comments Very informative

wrong pages?

[edit]

pages 270-1 in schultz is workplace violence, not labor unions. Dr Ashton (talk) 19:21, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]