User talk:Lurulu

Welcome!

Hello, Lurulu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Introduction

5 The five pillars of Wikipedia

How to edit a page

Help

Tips

How to write a great article

Manual of Style

Fun stuff...

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! VivioFa teFan ^{(Talk, Sandbox)} 00:29, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Farewell to Nova Scotia (1CD)

A tag has been placed on Farewell to Nova Scotia (1CD), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion A1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.Toddst1 01:30, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Scottish Folk.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Scottish Folk.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:04, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Wae's me for Prince Charlie.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Wae's me for Prince Charlie.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:41, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Farewell to Nova Scotia (1CD)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Farewell to Nova Scotia (1CD), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Scottish Folk. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:31, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Farewell to Nova Scotia.jpeg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Farewell to Nova Scotia.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 20:45, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Image:Farewell to Nova Scotia.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Farewell to Nova Scotia.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Farewell to Nova Scotia.jpg is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Farewell to Nova Scotia.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 21:04, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Farewell to Nova Scotia.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Farewell to Nova Scotia.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:50, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Bon Scott

Hi Lurulu! We don't do it that way on Wikipedia. Please delete what you added, and put double square brackets around the first occurrence (only) of the word 'Fremantle'. That will turn the word blue and create a link to the article about the city. Best wishes. Philip Trueman (talk) 11:16, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to U2

The location of the dates was no problem in the articles promotion to featured article status, and it has been agreed through discussion that Songs of Ascent belongs with the same information as No Line on the Horizon because so little information about it is available yet. Please take any issues that you may have with the article to the talk page so that an edit war does not begin. MelicansMatkin (talk) 19:33, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Because I do not view your edits as being an improvement. As I have already suggested, please take it to the talk page if you are so concerned with the article's quality, so that a discussion with all the contributors to the article can ensue. MelicansMatkin (talk) 19:40, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Because placing the dates first looks horrendous, and I have seen no other article which does it. When discussing an event, the most commonly accepted practice is to list the event first and the date after. I have already explained to you about Songs of Ascent. I repeat myself yet again; if you are that concerned then take it to the talk page so everyone can discuss it instead of on my talk page where nobody is aware of it. And yes I am a "big brother", though I hardly see how my family matters are any of your concern. MelicansMatkin (talk) 19:49, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know what you were referring to, I was being facetious. Since it is about the article you take it to the article's talk page, not to me. Regarding the dates, I will say it again: the most commonly accepted practice is to list the event first and the date after. Any further discussion should take place here. I will not respond to any further comments about it on my talk page. MelicansMatkin (talk) 20:20, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for my last comment; it was unnecessarily rude and I have removed it. I have opened up a discussion here. Please direct any further concerns or comments there instead of my talk page. MelicansMatkin (talk) 20:29, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize again for my rude comment, and you're right that it was undeserved. I've dealt with a lot of frustrating issues recently, including a few trying users, and my patience snapped when you refused to listen to my suggestion to open a discussion on the talk page. That wasn't right, and I apologize. Discussing issues with as many editors as possible by posting on the talk page instead of just with one user is how Wikipedia is built, and it is the best way to avoid conflict. MelicansMatkin (talk) 20:47, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I never reported you for making any personal attack, and I didn't actually take it as such. I took it to be something said in the heat of the moment, much as my own rude comment had been. That the user came by and removed it was simply a coincidence. And I don't understand what you mean by censorship, as I have seen no censorship here today. In fact, Wikipedia is on the whole very much uncensored. MelicansMatkin (talk) 21:23, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Watch your tone

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User talk:MelicansMatkin. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Calling other editors "narrow-minded" is inappropriate. -Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Cardmaker)} 20:30, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your comments on Talk:U2: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. MelicansMatkin (talk) 22:21, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Our Secrets Are The Same

A tag has been placed on Our Secrets Are The Same requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Terrillja _talk 19:27, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Lurulu. You have new messages at Dabomb87's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dabomb87 (talk) 00:20, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And again. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:11, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Paul McCartney 2009 Summer Tour

Paul McCartney 2009 Summer Tour is unofficial yet —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.31.103.35 (talk) 05:57, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We have to search the Gross Revenue like madonna´s concerts tour (Sticky & Sweet Tour) (talk)

Proposed deletion of Capercaillie concert tours

The article Capercaillie concert tours has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:NOTDIRECTORY. This is more something last.fm would like.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ironholds (talk) 02:07, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Capercaillie concert tours

I have nominated Capercaillie concert tours, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capercaillie concert tours. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ironholds (talk) 22:53, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I fully expect that in seven days there isn't going to be a page to edit. See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS for what your argument essentially is. Ironholds (talk) 01:04, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Capercaillie concert tours. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Ironholds (talk) 17:28, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good Evening Brazil¿

Hi, i have read that Macca going to play in brazil next april Friday 17th April 2010

Paul McCartney with Chiclete Com Banana at Maracana Stadium Maracana Stadium Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Sunday 18th April 2010 Paul McCartney at Morumbi Stadium Morumbi Stadium São Paulo, Brazil

Wednesday 21th April 2010 Paul McCartney at Esplanada dos Ministérios Esplanada dos Ministérios Brasilia, Brazil

Friday 23rd April 2010 Paul McCartney at Arruda Stadium Arruda Stadium Recife, Brazil

Sunday 25 April 2010 Paul McCartney with Elvis Costello, Heitor e Banda Gentileza, Inimigos Da Hp, and 3 more... at Pedreira Paulo Leminski Pedreira Paulo Leminski Curitiba, Brazil

Tuesday 27 April 2010 Paul McCartney with Elvis Costello, Wilco, and Coldplay at Megaspace Megaspace Belo Horizonte, Brazil

In my opinion, we have make only one page GOOD EVENING TOUR (Summer Live ´09 + Good Evening Europe + Brazil´s concerts ) Mike-hilal (talk) 04:05, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA reassessment of Bon Scott

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. You are being notified as you have made a number of contributions to the article. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:Bon Scott/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:23, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Altan concert tours

I have nominated Altan concert tours, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Altan concert tours. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 19:37, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merging A Saucerful of Secrets US Tour

Hi there, and thanks for starting that A Saucerful of Secrets US Tour article. I've looked at how this information fits with Pink Floyd European Tour 1968, and decided that the two separate pages would be better served by a merger into one article, which I'm thinking of calling Pink Floyd 1968 Tour or something similar to that.

Feel free to leave me a message, or comment on one of the two relevant talk pages if you disagree or have other thoughts on this matter. BotleySmith (talk) 18:41, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Altan concert tours

A tag has been placed on Altan concert tours, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. O Fenian (talk) 09:41, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jim Kerr Concert Tours

A tag has been placed on Jim Kerr Concert Tours, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. <>Multi‑Xfer<> (talk) 06:32, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of content tags

This is regarding your recent removal of content tags in Lostboy!_AKA_Jim_Kerr. Such tags are for improvement of the article and should not be removed without reason, especially by the article creator. If you wish to remove article tags, please address the issues they represent first. Mamyles (talk) 23:08, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed there are sources, however souces must conform to guidelines set in WP:SOURCE. Sources must be third-party, which is why the tag was added. If such sources cannot be found, it is subject to the Criteria for speedy deletion section A9, for lack of importance. Mamyles (talk) 23:20, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Owl City. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Oh and by the way; your additions were uneeded and somatically incorrect. Nothing other than studio aalbums to the discography section of an article are to be included when the discography already has its own article. GunMetal Angel 06:13, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lostboy! AKA Tours

A tag has been placed on Lostboy! AKA Tours, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — Timneu22 · talk 13:23, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Headings and Use of flags

Please read the above guidelines before reverting my edits again. Gratuitous use of flags within articles is discouraged and heading titles should only use capitals letters on proper nouns. Thank you. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 22:32, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of The Beatles' live performances

Please stop moving List of The Beatles' live performances to another title. If you wish to change the title, say your opinion on the talk page. If you continue to change the title without discussion, you may be blocked. Thank you. McLerristarr (Mclay1) (talk) 04:44, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Very kind of you ! I do wish to change the title of this article. Besides I feel no need to say my opinion on the talk page about it ! YOU started an edit war ! Not me ! Lurulu (talk) 21:05, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep the conversation in one place.

I did not start the edit war. You changed something without discussing it. Your change proved to be controversial and I reverted it asking you to discuss it on the talk page. You then changed it back without discussing it. This is not how a Wikipedia user should behave. Please discuss why you would like to change the title of the page. You may also wish to read Wikipedia's rules and WP:MOS since you clearly have not already. McLerristarr (Mclay1) (talk) 07:41, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article titles

Please stop changing article titles. I have reverted three already and I will continue to revert any others I find. Article titles should not have a capital letter for every word. Since everything on your talk page is about mistakes you have made, I assume you are an amateur editor, or at least an experienced editor who does not understand the rules. Please refer to links provided by VivioFateFan in the Welcome! segment of your talk page. McLerristarr (Mclay1) (talk) 09:58, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Max Romeo Tours

The article Max Romeo Tours has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOT a list of concerts. Max Romeo is a notable artist but this level of trivia doesn't belong on Wikipedia. In addition, it is not a list of tours, rather a list of concerts.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Toddst1 (talk) 12:14, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Altan Tours

A tag has been placed on Altan Tours requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 20:17, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Flags again

Please stop peppering articles with flags. It is against the Wikipedia manual of style. You have been asked to stop doing this, and had your additions removed, a number of times now, but appear to be completely unwilling to listen or discuss. Please stop. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 22:01, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Altan Tours

A tag has been placed on Altan Tours requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 00:48, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Altan Tours

A tag has been placed on Altan Tours, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 20:22, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Altan Tours

A tag has been placed on Altan Tours requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 18:19, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't give up...

Hi Lurulu. I know next-to-nothing about you, and we do move in different musical worlds, however I just wanted to say that I respect your energy and devotion in constructing detailed lists of information. I suspect we both have a desire to catalogue information and make it available for others. Unfortunately, the current structure of WP is not receptive to such hard work and devotion. Could I suggest you keep your lists of information going (perhaps in something like Google Docs) so that they will be available if ever the culture at WP lightens-up (and allows more detail than is presently permitted)? In the meantime, don't be discouraged. I know you are trying to help (by working as hard as you do) to catalogue history as it unfolds. Cheers. HWV258. 11:09, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The trick at WP (as far as I can determine it) is to build slowly—with at least one foot in the guidelines. Can you get a subset of your information into an article? Is there one notable concert you can document in more detail (with references)? That might be a great starting point. If you work within the current guidelines, then what you have added might be able to grow at a later stage. In the meantime, make sure you are storing all your information off-wiki (as I do). I know it's frustrating to have to hold back, but it is rewarding to see something you add stick. HWV258. 22:20, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the trick is to build consensus on what is in the articles. That is a core policy of Wikipedia and the only way that it can work. Lurulu, instead, inserts screeds of uncited trivia and external links to Youtube, repeatedly reverts it when removed, and refuses to discuss anything with other editors. This is simply disruptive and is not going to achieve anything.

No-one has anything against detail, but when an artist's article is turned into the state where it is 2/3 uncited set lists from recent tours, something that no one has anyway of verifying and is list cruft of no interest to anyone but the most obsessive of fans (and therefore belongs on a fan site, not an encyclopaedia), then it should be no surprise when it is challenged and removed. If Lurulu wishes it to remain they must first justify it, and that means discussing it. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 08:40, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Altan Concert Tours

A tag has been placed on Altan Concert Tours requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 18:34, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of List of Altan live tours

A tag has been placed on List of Altan live tours requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 19:23, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recreation of Altan tours

Please stop recreating the article that was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Altan concert tours. From what I can tell you have recreated this article at least six times in what looks like the past fifteen days. Each of these recreations have been speedily deleted per Wikipedia:Speedy deletion #G4: "Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion." Since you feel this article needs to belong on Wikipedia, instead of continually recreating this article at a host of different titles, you need to start a discussion with the administrator that deleted the article after the deletion discussion, User:Shimeru, and if the administrator does not agree with you, you can start a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Aspects (talk) 19:31, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So I told you exactly what you needed to do to try and get the article kept on Wikipedia and instead of heeding this advice you decide to ... recreate the article yet again at a new title. You need to follow my advice or you could risk being blocked for disruptive editing. Aspects (talk) 03:59, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of List of Altan Live

A tag has been placed on List of Altan Live requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 04:01, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 04:03, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on Jim Kerr. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 02:23, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not assume ownership of articles such as Owl City concert tours. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 00:13, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop assuming ownership of articles such as Owl City concert tours. Doing so may lead to disruptive behavior such as edit wars and is a violation of policy, which may lead to your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Aspects (talk) 19:43, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reversions on Jim Kerr

I've asked you repeatedly to discuss your additions to the Jim Kerr article. You should know that you are now in breech of Wikipedia policy on edit warring. I invite you to revert your last edit and discuss it on the talk page, as you have already been requested to on a number of occasions. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 16:23, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

3rr warning on Jim Kerr

Just as a note, but you have made three reverts in a 24-hour period and any other revert could result in being blocked from editing. Aspects (talk) 20:35, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since you decided not to heed my warning and made another revert in the same 24-hour period, I have reported you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Lurulu reported by User:Aspects (Result: ). Please feel free to comment there. Aspects (talk) 21:27, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Altan Live

A tag has been placed on Altan Live requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 23:00, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Jim Kerr. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. --Chris (talk) 01:42, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Kerr

Please see my reply on the Jim Kerr talk page, thanks. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 08:07, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributions

I'm sorry that you haven't listened to what everyone has tried to tell you. If you continue with your chosen course of action it is only going to result in longer, and perhaps permanent, blocks. No one is trying to stop you contributing to Wikipedia, and I can only admire your enthusiasm. But you cannot continue to ignore Wikipedia guidelines and policies, particularly when others have repeatedly tried to explain them to you.

Reposting articles, without any changes, that have been repeatedly deleted before is disruptive. You will not get your article accepted as long as it fails to show notability. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate source of information. Subjects need to show notability and verifiable. That means citing things from reliable sources, something that you have not yet made any attempt to do.
If your additions are challenged by others, the correct action is to discuss and reach consensus on them. Continually and blindly reverting them back in is edit warring, which is disruptive, a waste of everyone's time and, I guarantee, will not get you what you want. It will also get you blocked. Consensus is a key policy on Wikipedia. You will not achieve anything without it, and sometimes that means you have to compromise. 'If you cannot learn to live with this then Wikipedia is not for you.
You do not own any of the articles you are editing or creating. They are not 'yours'. If you look, you will see at the bottom of the edit pages it says "If you do not want your writing to be edited, used, and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here." If you cannot learn to live with this then Wikipedia is not for you.
Indiscriminate and uncited sets lists of gigs, with links to Youtube, are not appropriate to Wikipedia. They violate guidelines on appropriate external links, lists of links, and verifiability policy. The proper place for these are on a fansite, or, better yet, on Youtube itself.
Flag icons should be used sparingly. Peppering articles with them is against Manual of style guidelines.
If an act is American, articles about it should use American spelling and American date formats.

--Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 22:45, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Did you mean to do this? --John (talk) 20:45, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes ! Any problem ? Lurulu (talk) 20:53, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Did you want to say something to me or were you just saying hi? --John (talk) 20:56, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm (was) 86.204.196.78 !

Ah. It might be simpler if you could log in, then we know who we are speaking to. --John (talk) 21:29, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As you can read above, I have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours by some kind people ! Wikipedia becomes far too restrictive those days... Lurulu (talk) 21:35, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your block has expired, or else you wouldn't be able to post at my talk! Just as well, as editing while logged out would count as block evasion. So, welcome back, and get over to Talk:Pink Floyd and make your point, if you still want to. There's no need to reply at my talk as I have this page watched. Best wishes. --John (talk) 23:08, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Max Romeo Live performances

I have nominated Max Romeo Live performances, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Max Romeo Live performances. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Cindamuse (talk) 23:53, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Max Romeo Live performances, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 00:07, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Manual of Style

Please stop reverting edits that apply the Manual of Style. It is simply being disruptive and I do not believe that is your purpose for being here. We all have to fall into line sometimes, there are parts of Wikipedia and guidelines that irritate me too, and I'd happily get rid of. But I have to compromise and follow the guidelines established by consensus. It's what Wikipedia relies on, it couldn't ever work if people didn't compromise.

So you may not think so, but the guidelines do apply to you and your edits. They are there for a reason. They ensure a degree of consistency across millions of articles that would be a confusing mess without them. No-one has the lee-way to ignore them simply because they don't personally care for them. And certainly no-one can be allowed to remove the work of those who attempt to apply the manual of style to articles.

It would help everyone, including yourself, if you could give a little and compromise too. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 16:55, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Candy Store Rock

Stop it. It's called overlinking, including "...the names of major geographic features and locations...", and it gets removed. Radiopathy •talk• 23:25, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter what you call it; you're edit warring with editors who are undoing your edits which go against the Wikipedia Manual of Style, like User :Escape Orbit tried to point out to you, and you're working towards getting yourself blocked from editing. Radiopathy •talk• 22:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Candy Store Rock. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Radiopathy •talk• 02:17, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

3rr warning on Owl City concert tours

You have made three reverts in a 24-hour period and any other revert could result in being blocked from editing. Please join the discussion instead of continually reverting back to your preferred version of the article. You do not WP:OWN this article and you need to try and build a consensus with other editors. Aspects (talk) 08:12, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Owl City concert tours. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 12:19, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Altan concert tours

A tag has been placed on Altan concert tours requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hang on}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. O Fenian (talk) 21:37, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. O Fenian (talk) 21:39, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. O Fenian (talk) 21:44, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

If you continue to make false claims of being attacked or harassed, I will take the matter to the administrators noticeboard. O Fenian (talk) 21:51, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

...and if you continue to find new and imaginative names for an article in your efforts to bypass a community decision you're likely to end up being prevented from editing. I've just deleted your latest attempt, Altan concert tours and protected it against recreation. Do not create the article again with a new name. TFOWR 21:55, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to 25th Anniversary Celebration and Altan (band)

Lurulu, PLEASE stop changing the details of these articles. The album was recorded live, you can check it out at Mairéad Ní Mhaonaigh's website! Your edits are simply incorrect! Filastin (talk) 22:15, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are mistaking! The album was definitely not recorded live! Check out the CD cover! It says: "Recorded in RTE Studios, Dublin". In addition, no audience sound is heard in any of the track! Maybe it was recorded "live in studio" but not before a public audience! My edits are correct! Lurulu (talk) 01:04, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Then it would be a new studio album, and not a compilation album as was previously edited.. Filastin (talk) 07:34, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Check it out: it was not previously listed as a compilation album but as a new studio album! Lurulu (talk) 09:50, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dan Lampinski (bootlegger)

A tag has been placed on Dan Lampinski (bootlegger) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ttonyb (talk) 22:25, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tangerine Tree

Did you need help with Tangerine Tree? ---— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 18:01, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Owl City concert tours for deletion

The article Owl City concert tours is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Owl City concert tours until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 00:44, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jamiroquai concerts

The article Jamiroquai concerts has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is WP:NOT#DIRECTORY. A list of tour dates is not appropriate.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shire Reeve (talk) 19:15, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Battlefield Band concert tours

The article Battlefield Band concert tours has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is WP:NOT#DIRECTORY. A list of tour dates is not appropriate.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shire Reeve (talk) 19:18, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Jonanderson survival-500x500.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jonanderson survival-500x500.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:06, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 20:36, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Agnes Obel concerts

The article Agnes Obel concerts has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a directory. We are not a forum to publish a band's touring schedule.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 20:39, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 20:43, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re

Please see WP:ITSUSEFUL and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. I'll ask for a second opinion on your article; however, the WP:MOSFLAG issue is very cut and dry; the specific section I'm referring to is WP:ICONDECORATION#Encyclopaedic purpose. I removed the ANI thread because I frankly don't have the energy to deal with it at the moment, so I'll give it a shot working it out with you. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 01:05, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agnes Obel concerts

Hi. I concur with editor's assessment and User:Noformation. Content is not of historical or encyclopedic value. Page contravenes WP:ADVERT and WP:CONCERT TOUR and can be speedily deleted deleted. If notability is not asserted and supported by reliable sources|, the page will be deleted on expiry of the proposed deletion. See also WP:OTHERSTUFF, and WP:CRYSTAL. Please try to create pages that conform to Wkipedia policies and guidelines, it would help maintain a friendly atmosphere and save a lot of unnecessary administrator time - in the worst case scenario, you could even end up getting blocked for repeated creation of inappropriate pages. User Blade has made some suggestions, please consider taking any advice he has to offer and work with him to resolve these situations. Regards, --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:50, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jamiroquai concerts for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jamiroquai concerts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamiroquai concerts until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:05, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Reid (musician)

Hi. I'm just letting you know that instead of immediately deleting this article outright for copyright violations (you can't take text from other websites), I've recast some of the sentences, and changed the name throughout to 'Reid' instead of 'Alan' (remember that this is an encyclopedia and not a fan site). However, due to the lack of references, this article is still very much a candidate for deletion - please address the issues as soon as you can. Thanks. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:09, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Agnes Obel concerts for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Agnes Obel concerts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agnes Obel concerts until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 04:38, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Caladh Nua

A tag has been placed on Caladh Nua requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Eeekster (talk) 21:13, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alan Reid (musician)

The article Alan Reid (musician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent sources found. Does not assert notability per WP:BAND

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:13, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Instead of deleting this article outright per WP:CSD#A7, I'm according you a further 7 days to provide references per WP:RS (reliable sources) that assert notability and that conform to WP:BAND (bands & musicians). --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:19, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Lurulu. You have new messages at Salvio giuliano's talk page.
Message added 18:04, 14 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 18:04, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Jamiroquai's concert tours

A tag has been placed on Jamiroquai's concert tours requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead recreating the page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 19:25, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Chieftains' concert tours

The article The Chieftains' concert tours has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is WP:NOT#DIRECTORY and the article contravenes WP:ADVERT and WP:CONCERT TOUR since there are no reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Aspects (talk) 19:32, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Jamiroquai's concert tours

A tag has been placed on Jamiroquai's concert tours requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead recreating the page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 23:48, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Chieftains' concert tours for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Chieftains' concert tours is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Chieftains' concert tours until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Aspects (talk) 23:59, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jamiroquai's concert tours

A tag has been placed on Jamiroquai's concert tours, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Only lists dates of a tour which can already be found on the artists website. The article has no infomation about the tour apart from the dates and conatins no encyclopedia material

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Oddbodz (talk) 23:31, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jamiroquai's concert tours

A tag has been placed on Jamiroquai's concert tours, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. →Σ τ c. 23:32, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Jamiroquai's concert tours, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. This article was deleted via a consensus decision at an AfD discussion. Please refrain from recreating it again. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 23:44, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Deep Purple 2009 Tour

Hello, Lurulu, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deep Purple 2009 Tour whether the article Deep Purple 2009 Tour should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Deep Purple 2009 Tour, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! jsfouche ☽☾Talk 23:47, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Black Sabbath concert tours, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Donnington and Vitoria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Black Sabbath concert tours

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Black Sabbath concert tours. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Black Sabbath 2012 Reunion Tour. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Black Sabbath 2012 Reunion Tour - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Aspects (talk) 06:31, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What did you think about the deletion notice you received?

Hi Lurulu,

In November you received a message about either "Nomination for deletion" or "Proposed deletion" of an article you created. I'd like to ask you a few quick questions:

Was the message helpful? Were the instructions clear and easy to follow?
If not, how do you think the message could be improved?
What do you think about the deletion process in general? Do you understand how to contest a deletion?

You can feel free to answer on my talk page or send me your response by email (mpinchukwikimedia.org). (I won't quote you or link your answers to your username if you don't feel comfortable with that.) Your feedback is incredibly useful for improving the content of deletion notifications, so please take a minute to think about and answer these questions. Thank you! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 23:58, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited "5X5 Live" Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rock (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:58, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Simple Minds concert tours, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hyde Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

Hi. When you recently edited Simple Minds' Festival Tour 2012, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Roma, Grado and Newcastle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More set lists

I have listed my concerns for the "Set Lists" section you are creating on the Simple Minds' Festival Tour 2012 article on the talk page. Could you please reply to each of them.

You have a long history of implementing sections like this, and the issues with them have been repeatedly pointed out to you before, so I don't expect you to be reading anything new with these concerns. However you do seem to believe that it's ok to just ignore them. That is not the case.

Thanks. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 14:11, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond to my questions on the talk page. As I said above; just ignoring them is not going to gain any consensus for your additions and will result in them being removed. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 16:44, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Greatest Hits + (2013) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Greatest Hits + (2013) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greatest Hits + (2013) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. LK (talk) 05:02, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 5X5 Live for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 5X5 Live is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/5X5 Live until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. LK (talk) 05:05, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Simple Minds' Australian Tour 2012 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Simple Minds' Australian Tour 2012 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simple Minds' Australian Tour 2012 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. LK (talk) 05:05, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Set lists

Please stop responding to my concerns and actions with simply stating "It's sourced and useful." You need to explain why you think it's well sourced. And "it's useful" is not a valid reason for including content that guidelines and policies say should not be included. As it is, your continued refusal to discuss or justify this content (other than your usual "it should be left alone because I say so") simply suggest to me that you cannot justify it, and that you know it flies in the face of policy and guidelines. If this is the case then I can only also suggest that your insistence on adding it is disruptive. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 20:34, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Simple Minds' Festival Tour 2012 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Simple Minds' Festival Tour 2012 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simple Minds' Festival Tour 2012 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 16:41, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry I've nominated the above for deletion, but you have been informed repeatedly about Wikipedia notability guidelines regarding concerts, gigs and tours, yet repeatedly you choose to pretend they don't apply to articles you create. I've indicated the problems with this article for some time, but as usual you've ignored what anyone else has to say. I've tried to find evidence for notability for this tour, but other than event listings and the like, there is nothing to indicate it should have an article devoted to it. Please try and follow guidelines before creating more tour articles and be sure that you can demonstrate notability. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 16:49, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 5X5 Live

A tag has been placed on 5X5 Live, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 22:32, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Simple Minds' Australian Tour 2012

A tag has been placed on Simple Minds' Australian Tour 2012, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 22:33, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Greatest Hits + (2013)

A tag has been placed on Greatest Hits + (2013), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 22:33, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

A tag has been placed on a page you created requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit [[|the page's discussion directly]] to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 22:36, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. When an article has been discussed, and a consensus has been reached that it should be deleted, trying to unilaterally overturn that consensus by ignoring it and re-creating the article is not constructive. Nor does it make your action look better if you give such reasons for keeping your re-created article as "That's the way it is". JamesBWatson (talk) 16:03, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Simple Minds' Festival Tour 2012

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Simple Minds' Festival Tour 2012, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Simple Minds' Festival Tour 2012. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 19:49, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 5X5 Live

A tag has been placed on 5X5 Live, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Eeekster (talk) 19:49, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at 5X5 Live, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Please stop recreating articles that were removed via a deletion discussion. Eeekster (talk) 19:51, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Simple Minds' Festival Tour 2012

A tag has been placed on Simple Minds' Festival Tour 2012, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Eeekster (talk) 19:52, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Simple Minds' Australian Tour 2012

A tag has been placed on Simple Minds' Australian Tour 2012, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Eeekster (talk) 19:53, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Greatest Hits + (2013)

A tag has been placed on Greatest Hits + (2013), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Eeekster (talk) 19:55, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Simple Minds' Australian Tour 2012

When this has been deleted after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simple Minds' Australian Tour 2012, you cannot just re-create it because you disagree. If you think the discussion was wrongly decided, or you have new information, you can approach user MBisanz (talk), the administrator who closed the discussion; if he does not agree, you can take your concerns to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 22:26, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Greatest Hits + 2013

Hello, Lurulu, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Greatest Hits + 2013, appears to be directly copied from http://www.noise11.com/news/simple-minds-to-do-greatest-hits-tour-in-uk-20121025. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Greatest Hits + 2013 if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 16:55, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Simple Minds Festival Tour 2012

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Simple Minds Festival Tour 2012, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.simpleminds.org/sm/tours/t2012-2/index.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 16:57, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Simple Minds Festival Tour 2012

A tag has been placed on Simple Minds Festival Tour 2012, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 16:17, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Simple Minds Festival Tour 2012

A tag has been placed on Simple Minds Festival Tour 2012, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 16:21, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been indefinitely blocked for repeatedly recreating articles that have been deleted via WP:AFD. Toddst1 (talk) 16:31, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Simple Minds Australian Tour 2012

A tag has been placed on Simple Minds Australian Tour 2012, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 17:37, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 5X5 Live 2012

A tag has been placed on 5X5 Live 2012, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 17:37, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Greatest Hits + 2013

A tag has been placed on Greatest Hits + 2013, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 17:38, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Owl City concert tours for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Owl City concert tours is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Owl City concert tours (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 17:33, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wae's me for Prince Charlie.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wae's me for Prince Charlie.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:02, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]