User talk:LukeWD2020

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 21:52, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at David Arquette with this edit. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Jamietw (talk) 15:37, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on User talk:Jamietw. Thank you. —SMALL JIM 15:49, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Magnificent Seven (2017 film), you may be blocked from editing. Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 15:58, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Philip Doherty

The article Philip Doherty has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Dakar (talk) 14:17, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Buncrana has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Buncrana was changed by LukeWD2020 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.866673 on 2015-08-17T00:35:17+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:35, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Philip Doherty

The article Philip Doherty has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Actor who falls under way too soon-first film hasn't even been released yet.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 03:26, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Philip Doherty

The article Philip Doherty has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The Average Wikipedian (talk) 15:07, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Philip Doherty

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Philip Doherty requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Rollingcontributor (talk) 17:20, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Paul McCartney, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been or will be reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MarnetteD|Talk 15:31, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:03, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]