User talk:LuisSuazo300

June 2016

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Sandro Ramírez, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 10:01, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

LuisSuazo300, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi LuisSuazo300! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sandro Ramírez, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:01, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Borja Mayoral

Why are you removing cited facts from this article? In what world has he never played for Real Madrid's first team? You will be reported for vandalism if you do it again, especially if you do not explain yourself. '''tAD''' (talk) 23:06, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Borja Mayoral. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Qed237 (talk) 20:53, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Sandro Ramírez shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Qed237 (talk) 20:54, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to delete your account

RE your request [1]. You may blank almost anything from your talk page, but there is no way to delete your account. Meters (talk) 22:30, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Swarm ♠ 22:30, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Luis Miguel Ramis

Hi there, from Portugal,

please trust me, to say "promote in the promotion playoffs" is redundant, no need to mention it twice. I know we have PROMOTION and RELEGATION playoffs, but if he failed to PROMOTE it's obvious what playoffs we are talking about.

Thanks, happy editing --Be Quiet AL (talk) 18:57, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

July 2016

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at User talk:The Almightey Drill, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. This is not allowed, per our "No personal attacks" policy. Gestrid (talk) 22:50, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, LuisSuazo300. You have new messages at Gestrid's talk page.
Message added 04:49, 22 July 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Gestrid (talk) 04:49, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:NoelValladares.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:NoelValladares.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:06, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LuisSuazo300. I noticed your problem with the image. (I wasn't the one that tagged it, though. ImageTaggingBot did that.) If you'd like, you can ask what to do at the Teahouse, and we can help you through the process rather quickly, provided you have permission to use the photo. (If you don't, the image will automatically be deleted on August 1st, as the notice on the image's page says.) -- Gestrid (talk) 17:44, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Forum

Hi. Please note that wikipedia is not a forum for personal thoughts and discussions should be related to content and how to improve wikipedia. For that readon your recent comment regarding Zidane has been removed from Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football. Qed237 (talk) 19:44, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Marcos Llorente.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. — Anakimi_lambaste 04:34, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Marcos Llorente. — Anakimi_lambaste 21:07, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Marcos Llorente, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Kante4 (talk) 06:51, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Llorente

Who cares what you think, he IS with the senior team. I will report you for your disruptive editing after seing your argument. Kante4 (talk) 18:26, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive Editing

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. — Anakimi_lambaste 21:23, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alex Shih ^Talk 02:01, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Hello, I'm Kante4. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Borja Mayoral have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kante4 (talk) 09:09, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Marcos Llorente, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Kante4 (talk) 09:09, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, LuisSuazo300. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, LuisSuazo300. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]