User talk:LucilleBall

Speedy deletion of Troubled Waters (film)

A tag has been placed on Troubled Waters (film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Myosotis Scorpioides 01:45, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why was there previously nothing about her online podcast Girl on Guy?

(via the Aisha Tyler discussion section) I added info about her new weekly podcast Girl on Guy in her Career section and References, and even put in an Online section on the page about Girl on Guy since there was previously nothing about her new weekly podcast. -- User:LucilleBall (talk) 23:11, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Archer (tv series)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Archer (tv series). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Archer (TV series). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Archer (TV series) - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Rymatz (talk) 12:02, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In response to the 2nd Archer page

I created the 2nd Archer page because I got confused on how to make a redirect on the Aisha Tyler Career section for the August 2011 section. I looked at the Wikipedia page about redirects and at the example in the Linking To A Redirect: "A redirect may be linked to from a source page the same way an article is linked—by placing the redirect page name within a set of double brackets, such as: Some name replacing Some name with the name of the redirect page to link. To link to a redirect page without following the underlying redirect, use: Some name replacing Some name with the name of the redirect page to link. Clicking on a noredirect link will send the reader to the redirect page rather than the final redirect destination." Yet I tried anything I could to make it seem like I knew how to redirect the Archer (tv series) article so that anyone who viewed the Aisha Tyler page and looked at the Girl On Guy section who saw this: "the third with Archer (tv series) creator Adam Reed debuted August 9, 2011" could see the Archer (tv series) paragraph and could edit it for me so that it could appear to be a proper redirect.

Hello, LucilleBall. You have new messages at User:LucilleBall.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

User:LucilleBall LucilleBall (talk) 14:35, 9 August 2011 (UTC) (LucilleBall) 10:38 (my own talk page), 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BLP policy

Hi, you recently posted content to the Kris Humphries article that violates our WP:BLP policy because it was contentious material about a living person that is poorly sourced. Please use better sources than gossip magazines. Thank you Hekerui (talk) 17:14, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Jake Nava, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page East London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Jack Benny, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Violinist (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:11, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Paris Hilton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Producer

Sia Furler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Wild Ones

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation

Text that you added to the article Elizabeth II at 20:42 today was directly copied word-for-word from a copyrighted source. Please familiarise yourself with Wikipedia:Copyright violations. Labelling the insertion of the content as a minor edit was a double fault. DrKiernan (talk) 22:06, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 11

Hi. When you recently edited Room for Happiness, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Depression (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Viscount Weymouth

Hi.
I've suggested adding some additional information to the Viscount Weymouth Wikipedia article on the Talk Page[1]. Could you review the content and confirm that the edits are OK before any changes are made?
Thanks Vjdigital (talk) 14:58, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Sia discography. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 23:43, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ancestry of Elizabeth II, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page House of David (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:52, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Hi - would you please read WP:VERIFY and WP:RS and make sure your sources meet these criteria? Reddit doesn't (nor do a number of the other sources at Ancestry of Elizabeth II which others have used). Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 06:04, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Forums are also not used as sources. Nor are other Wikipedia articles. Please also read WP:BLP which applies to the EII article. Sources for this article must strictly adhere to our sourcing policy and guidelines. I see other editors have reverted you and I've now reverted back to the state the article was in before you started editing. I'm particularly concerned that you added that she is a descendant of a Germanic god. Dougweller (talk) 15:58, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Duke of Rutland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Plantagenet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sia Furler may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

On 8 July 2014, ''[[1000 Forms of Fear]'' was released worldwide. It has since topped the [[Billboard 200]] in the

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:07, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kiely Williams, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michelle Williams. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:26, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, LucilleBall. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Violet Keene, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 16:53, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]