User talk:Lombardhillgroup

This is Lombardhillgroup's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Role of an “Obsoleter” in Business (June 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ratnahastin was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Role of an “Obsoleter” in Business and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ratnahastin (talk) 07:41, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lombardhillgroup! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ratnahastin (talk) 07:41, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:The Role of an “Obsoleter” in Business

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:The Role of an “Obsoleter” in Business, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:00, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
Provide a new username.

To do this, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Alexf^(talk) 08:46, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

reason to be unblocked

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Lombardhillgroup (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

WayneLim1234 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I am not receiving any compensation for this article speficially, I am an intern at Lombardhillgroup paid minimum wage by the hour and intend to only post about resources for creating businesses and not about my company or have any promotions. I have no interest in using the page to have any advertising The reason for my block is due to the fact that there were not enough resources in the article to back up my claims, and it came off as a promotion, and it will not be repeated. If unblocked, I will make sure to only use my page for creating educational content (with enough resources to support the articles claims)

Decline reason:

That makes you a paid editor. You say "it will not be repeated"; it's unclear what you won't be repeating and if you'll stop trying to create an article about "Obsoleter". Yamla (talk) 11:35, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was under the impression that I can still publish this article if I have enough evidence to back up with significant resources. However, I understand what you mean and will *not write an article about this*. Is it possible for my employer to write this article without being associated with the paid account, and as something personal? Please advise us on this as the obsoleter article has no intentions of promoting the company and is it just to give information on this topic. Lombardhillgroup (talk) 12:29, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not the place for that article. --Yamla (talk) 12:41, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If we make changes to the article to make it more encyclopedia like rather than suggestive, will you consider it? Lombardhillgroup (talk) 13:10, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. --Yamla (talk) 13:12, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]