User talk:Loganxmen
Welcome
[edit]
|
This is Loganxmen's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Nimmathi Ungal choice-1 (1997) (February 1)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nimmathi Ungal choice-1 (1997) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nimmathi Ungal choice-1 (1997), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, Loganxmen!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! The Drover's Wife (talk) 09:32, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
|
Hi , Greetings. Pls note that your creation of Ramany vs. Ramany Part II has been moved to Draft:Ramany vs. Ramany Part II. Content added/edited in Wikipedia needs "inline citation" from independent (third party / secondary / tertiary) reliable source (in any language) for verification to gauge the nobility criteria is met. The articles's inline citation is the WP:BURDEN which it is on the person adding the information. Please note official website, records of sport events or individual player records are consider primary source and not independent source, and social network source such as facebook, twitter, instagram, imbd and etc are considered NOT reliable source and can not be used for citing. Independent reliable source are sources are those obtain from major newspaper, such as The Guardian, Sydney Morning Herald, CNN news and etc. or source obtain from major publisher of the work (for example, Random House or Cambridge University Press). Pls see
- reliable source - see WP:RS
- primary vs secondary vs tiartiary source - see WP:WPNOTRS
- verification - see WP:V
- notability - see WP:N
- webcite - see WP:CITEWEB and its template -see Template: cite web
Once you have provided inline citations, kindly ping me at my talk page or at your talk page by typing {{ping|CASSIOPEIA}} (please remove "nowiki" upon replying) for me to review the page. For more editing help, you could send your question to the friendly and helpful volunteers at the Teahouse. Lastly, I strongly encourage you to visit WP:The Wikipedia Adventure for there are some short and fun exercises on neutrality, verifiability, collaboration, research and sourcing. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 00:11, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Ramany vs. Ramany Part II
[edit]Hello, Loganxmen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ramany vs. Ramany Part II".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus 09:19, 27 October 2018 (UTC)