User talk:Log6849129

Welcome!

Hello, Log6849129, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Jessica Nabongo, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Best practices for editors with close associations
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style
The Teahouse, our help forum for new editors

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, visit the Teahouse, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Skywatcher68 (talk) 16:01, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is no conflict of interest. I have removed the part about Woni Spotts as her claim and the research about it does not belong on Nabongo's page. It should be on the page on Woni Spotts. Log6849129 (talk) 16:09, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You claim to not have a conflict of interest yet you only complain about Instagram when it pertains to Woni Spotts? Interesting. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 16:30, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hi Log6849129! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Jessica Nabongo. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Jessica Nabongo, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:05, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:06, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Acid (Belgian YouTuber) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Acid (Belgian YouTuber). Thanks! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:19, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I focused on the details that can be referenced in English. I can add a lot more biographical details, but cannot support them with references in English as the person only got into the international news with that controversy. Log6849129 (talk) 21:48, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Acid (Belgian YouTuber) (August 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Too much emphasis on the controversy, which is WP:UNDUE. There is purely not much to say about the YouTuber as he doesn't meet WP:CREATIVE bio.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Acid (Belgian YouTuber) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:27, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Log6849129! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:27, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Jessica Nabongo) to prevent further edit warring. This does not prevent you from making edit requests using {{edit partially-blocked}} at Talk:Jessica Nabongo.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:09, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey ToBeFree! That page currently includes misinformation. Log6849129 (talk) 20:46, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If there is factually incorrect content that should be removed, please open the article's talk page (linked above in the block notification) and use {{edit partially-blocked}} as also already linked above in the block notification. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 07:04, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No I'm actually starting a dispute and will mention you Valerie :) Log6849129 (talk) 09:17, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not Valereee, but you are clearly biased is inappropriate for a talk page. Please focus on the content and avoid incivility. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:05, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

veiled threat

VJ? Valereee (talk) 22:07, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

what? Log6849129 (talk) 20:41, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You've called me VJ and Valerie. This feels like you're telling me you believe you've discovered I am Valerie Jsomething, and your statement "VJ...I am not gonna dox myself, or you" feels like a threat to do just that. I am unamused. Valereee (talk) 22:02, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you mean. Your user name is Valereee, it must have been autocorrect Log6849129 (talk) 13:53, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And VJ? Valereee (talk) 14:00, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]