User talk:Liverpoolynwa24
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Liverpoolynwa24, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Ae245 (talk) 13:54, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
July 2024
[edit]
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 16:45, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. FMSky (talk) 04:37, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Kostas Tsimikas. Michaeldble (talk) 22:13, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Materialscientist (talk) 02:03, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- I was following Wikipedia guidelines Liverpoolynwa24 (talk) 02:05, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:18, 24 July 2024 (UTC) Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dominik Szoboszlai, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. C F A 💬 23:06, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- How Liverpoolynwa24 (talk) 23:07, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Materialscientist @HJ Mitchell This issue has not been resolved at all since the block it seems: [[1]] [[2]] Michaeldble (talk) 11:17, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
August 2024
[edit]
Hello, I'm Jonathan Deamer. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Alexis Mac Allister, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 18:24, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
August 2024
[edit] Hello, your recent edits to Mohamed Salah have been reverted because you did not provide a reliable source. You can re-add the information if you'd like, but you would have to include a valid citation. If you wish to do so, please have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thanks, Vasil3fonov (talk) 07:04, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Please refrain from making edits based on speculation or personal opinion, as you have done multiple times in the past days. You may be blocked from editing if you continue to do so. Vasil3fonov (talk) 13:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
October 2024
[edit]Hi. A few things, as I notice you've been blocked for similar issues.
- 1) Do not add superlatives such as "known as one of the best players/defenders/whatever position in the world" without sources saying it. The three sources you added here to Joel Matip's article did not mention this whatsoever, you instead just took them from the article. If you are going to add something like this, you will need a wide range of sources to prove why this is the case, per WP:V. Same as here with Fabinho, none of the sources say anything about him being one of the best in the world and are instead just taken from earlier in the article without reading them.
- 2) Do not remove sourced content, like you did here at Ollie Watkins (with several reliable citations showing that he is regarded as one of the best strikers in the world), and here at Phil Foden (with slightly less, but still two reliable citations showing that he is regarded as one of the best players in the world). This is unexplained removal of cited content.
- 3) Please use an edit summary if you are adding or removing content so people know why you are adding or removing content.
Thanks. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 18:05, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
November 2024
[edit]For this claim that you made on the Caoimhín Kelleher article: [3] it doesn't appear that any of the three sources back up the point that's been made. For a claim like this, they should explicitly say this, but none of the sources make any sort of similar statement at all. Please be more careful with this in the future Michaeldble (talk) 00:34, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
January 2025
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 11:51, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 12:00, 3 January 2025 (UTC)