User talk:Lionel Aschka
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 14:20, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
December 2021
[edit]A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. VVikingTalkEdits 14:24, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Bbb23 (talk) 14:30, 8 December 2021 (UTC)Lionel Aschka (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
ok, so you may see my page as an attack, well - but what about racist content on wikipedia attacking random people that visit the site? and what about those users who work against banning such content? wikipedia does not seem to have a clear line against racism, it does not seem to take such things seriously. these users don't seem to take such things seriously. Lionel Aschka (talk) 14:34, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 14:41, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Lionel Aschka (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
ah ok, just ignoring the main topic (racism!) by applying bureaucracy. then go ahead and delete my account, i will block wikipedia from my computer then, too. hope we never meet again. Lionel Aschka (talk) 14:44, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I'm going to be blunt. Crying racism to get your point across where there isn't any is a sure fire way to NOT get unblocked. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:55, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
LOL, I said delete instead.
Maybe you've already been blunt before. Nevermind. I'll stop rage now. Bye. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lionel Aschka (talk • contribs)
- Good luck in your future endeavors, Lionel Aschka, but you should know that, as it stands, your position is indistinguishable from trolling, as it is an extremely amateurish way to assist with Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias. It doesn't really matter right now whether this is intentional (in which case we WP:DENY) or due to just general incompetence — it's disruptive all the same. El_C 15:02, 8 December 2021 (UTC)