User talk:Lilyu
dont {{welcome}} me, please.Lilyu (talk) 23:05, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
.
[edit]- Welcome dear new contributor... --Gdgourou (talk) 15:24, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- HAHAHAHAHAHA :) Lilyu (talk) 22:29, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
{{talkheader}}
Olympe de Gouges
[edit]Good to see you again, Lilyu. Nice job on Olympe de Gouges...and haha! Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 03:41, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Miley Cyrus picture
[edit]Excuse me, the username is John Durney apparently.--Ipatrol (talk) 23:30, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
I would delete that Miley Cyrus image, but i'm not an administrator. So we'll have to wait for an admin to delete it. Edgehead5150 talk 01:12, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
Hunter Pence
[edit]I took that picture. http://flickr.com/photos/mlstros/2614533191/ Mlstros (talk) 11:36, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
I did, thanks. I have no idea what I'm doing on Wikipedia and if this is sending or not but thanks again. Merci beaucoup hahah Mlstros (talk) 20:36, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
Nooooo. I'm only 16. I want to become a professional sports photographer when I grow up though. What island do you live on? Mlstros (talk) 23:54, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Air-to-ground weaponry
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Air-to-ground weaponry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ~~ [ジャム][t - c] 14:59, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Taro
[edit]Hi – I've just replied to the comment you made a few months ago on Talk:Taro, about merging that article. Richard New Forest (talk) 09:05, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
The article Air-to-ground weaponry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Unreferenced, incomplete list that doesn't cover its intended topic in a very useful fashion.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Bushranger One ping only 05:55, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
A cup of coffee for you!
[edit]
|
Hello. We may have gotten off on the wrong foot. I apologize for being rude. I would appreciate cooperating with you on the Scientology in France article, and hopefully we can discuss any disagreements on the article's talk page. Again, you have my apologies. Grayfell (talk) 22:25, 15 October 2014 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Lilyu. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)