Talk:Air-to-ground weaponry

Military history: Aviation / Technology / Weaponry

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Engineering

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

just created it, i'm working on it... by the way, i'm not that good in english so dont expect me to wrote a whole article, just a stub, k? Look at french article if you think this article cannot be expanded... Lilyu (talk) 15:05, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you aren't that good at English, it would probably have been best to request creation of the article, based on the French article. However, I'm no good at French so I can't translate the article for you. ~~ [ジャム]^[t - c] 15:09, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still working on the french article. Well, i'm not that bad in english, just not as good as a native english speaker. Lilyu (talk) 15:36, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article looks more substantial now. Had the speedy not been declined, I'd have withdrawn it anyway. Good luck with improving the article. ~~ [ジャム]^[t - c] 19:23, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rockets anyone?

PROD

I agree that article is unreferenced, incomplete (e.g. rockets) and mostly un-useful. But it does have a lot of in-links. Would it be better to change it to a stub ? This might be the right article for info about choice of weapon for mission/target etc - the French article might have some useful stuff. DexDor (talk) 06:54, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, that could possibly work, perhaps. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:26, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. The French article is a ref-free-zone so that doesn't help much. DexDor (talk)

I'll see if I can rustle up some refs later, but as a stub it's a lot more workable and the seed for a good coverage of the topic. (Should it perhaps be Air-to-ground weapons instead? - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 20:43, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]