User talk:LilySophie

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LilySophie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Blocked without good reason, despite making edits in line with Wikipedia policy which were repeatedly reverted without argument. - LilySophie (talk) 20:17, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Even assuming you are correct for the sake of argument, being correct is not a defense to edit warring, as every edit warrior thinks that their edits are correct. 331dot (talk) 20:40, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User:Bishonen Please refrain from making personal attacks, or I will have to seek discretionary sanctions. Thank you. - LilySophie (talk) 22:00, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The edit was 1. unhelpful and 2. had a very hostile tone, making it a personal attack and I will consider discretionary sanctions after seeking dispute resolution. - LilySophie (talk) 22:10, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions for which set of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Current areas of conflict? Doug Weller talk 13:37, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As it is clear to me that you intend to continue treating Wikipedia as a battleground once the block expires, I've modified it to indefinite.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:56, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LilySophie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Blocked for WP:BATTLEGROUND indefinitely despite 1. having consistently explained each edit I have made to articles, 2. not even having touched TALK after a short initial period of editing, 3. the initial temporary block having been due to edits which in one case violated WP:3RR only due to several editors reverting in the other direction while I was actively involved in WP:TALK discussion of these changes, during which no proper reasons were given for other parties' reverts. 3RR should have been followed, but given active communication on WP:TALK violation was not a case of outright refusal to communicate. Edit war template insertion was a case of genuine mistake, since it was my first time using this template (as proven by my edit history) and I had assumed it was proper guideline to give such notice to all parties involved in an edit war. - LilySophie (talk) 13:36, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Although this unblock request is somewhat stale, I am declining it anyway, pretty much for the reason Newimpartial has given. The unblock request has to be about your behaviour, what other people have done is not relevant. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 22:41, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Comment - that reads like an exemplary WP:NOTTHEM filing. Newimpartial (talk) 16:27, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]