User talk:Lililolol

Pink Suit tone tag

Hi Lililolol, could you please list on the Talk page occasions/paras where the tone is not encyclopedic, then they can be addressed and the tag removed? Thanks. Ericoides (talk) 18:30, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Team Titans?

Hi, I've noticed that you erased the Team Titans article (edit). The deletion of this article was at least debated or discussed, or you decided it arbitrarily? Fma12 (talk) 20:26, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Fma12 Hi, I didn’t "erase" the content; I simply redirected it to a more appropriate article, which is the list of Teen Titans comics. This decision wasn't arbitrary; I acted boldly because the original Teem Titans article didn't meet notability guidelines like WP:FICT or WP:BK. Lililolol (talk) 20:40, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t think the redirect needed to be discussed beforehand, but if you disagree, feel free to improve the article to meet the guidelines. Once it meets them, you can revert my edit and add the improved content. Lililolol (talk) 20:43, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, but I think it should have been discussed first. In fact, WP:be bold states "Although the boldness of contributors like you is one of Wikipedia's greatest assets, it is important that you take care of the common good and not edit disruptively or recklessly". I'll find out. Thanks, Fma12 (talk) 20:46, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to X-Men '97, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Clear reasoning has been given for why your edits were reverted, do not start an edit war. Please follow WP:BRD and take your concerns to the talk page. adamstom97 (talk) 18:48, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Adamstom.97 Hi, I do think my edits are organized. The lead section is better to ensure clearer flow and coverage of all important elements, making sure nothing feels out of place. Plus, I moved the viewership information into the release section, as it makes navigation easier and connects the two topics better. So Lililolol (talk) 18:54, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a standard layout and format for all MCU TV shows which applies to X-Men '97. If you wish to make a change to that you must establish consensus for your changes at the talk page. - adamstom97 (talk) 20:03, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Adamstom.97 Hi, is the "standard layout and format for all MCU TV" an essay or a policy? Could you direct me to it? Lililolol (talk) 21:13, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are some details at WP:MCU, but for the most part I am talking about consensus that has formed across many articles and discussions. - adamstom97 (talk) 06:23, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hard to Love (Blackpink song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hard to Love (Blackpink song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Royiswariii -- Royiswariii (talk) 12:24, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hi Lililolol! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Apt. (song) several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Apt. (song), please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. RachelTensions (talk) 21:14, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, your revisions are unjustified, stop your malicious behavior. Gloern (talk) 18:37, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gloern Lol "malicious" what?? Lililolol (talk) 18:39, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is valid to remove predictive expressions as they are not in keeping with Neutral Point of View as is required on this site. Gloern (talk) 18:41, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gloern Hi, you removed the entire source, leaving the section unsourced! Like you should only remove the "prediction" instead of the whole source. Lililolol (talk) 18:48, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then why do a revert twice? The better solution was to reinsert the source reference alone, thus what you did could be considered as malicious behavior. Gloern (talk) 18:54, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gloern Yeh, sorry about that. Re-inserting the source reference seems like too much work, so it’s better to just revert it and remove some parts instead. Lililolol (talk) 18:58, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hard to Love (Blackpink song)

The article Hard to Love (Blackpink song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Hard to Love (Blackpink song) and Talk:Hard to Love (Blackpink song)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Royiswariii -- Royiswariii (talk) 02:44, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hard to Love (Blackpink song)

The article Hard to Love (Blackpink song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hard to Love (Blackpink song) for comments about the article, and Talk:Hard to Love (Blackpink song)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Royiswariii -- Royiswariii (talk) 03:23, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Twice – One Spark.webp

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

File:Twice – One Spark.webp

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete or generic. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact source (such as the web page, or printed document) where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the direct/bare URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 04:28, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Just a note.

A ballad nor sentimental ballad is not a music genre it accompanies genres and so I would discourage adding it in the Genre box article of any music article. It is more so a style eg. Like a pop ballad. The genre would be pop, similar to at Number One Girl, where the music genre would be pop punk. I just wanted to clarify because I don't like edit warring and it also makes the article less likely to even move to B status and I just don't see why not clarify it rather than do that. If you have any arguments over a ballad being a genre then I'd prefer you tell me here or even at the article's talk page before making any changes. That's all, bye. This0k (talk) 19:32, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@This0k Hi, sorry I didn’t realize that “ballad” or “sentimental ballad” aren’t music genres، thanks for pointing that out. I also removed “Soft Rock” as a genre based on a policy I read (but can’t find now) stating that if a source doesn’t explicitly label a song as a certain genre, it can’t be classified as such. For example, Clash didn’t label the song as “Soft Rock,” but Rolling Stone did call it “Pop Rock. Lililolol (talk) 18:15, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad you responded to me as I wanted to ask if at APT (song) the songwriters and composers can be separated. I know this seems like a long time coming but if you could do this it would be great as the amount of songwriters there is bulky and in those cases i feel like it's best to separate but you tell me if you think just leave as is is preferred. The reason why I'm asking this is because many say that it just Rosé and Bruno Mars who wrote the song but who knows this could be completely false if it is then please let me know. This0k (talk) 20:28, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@This0k I think that's false. In the CD liner notes, they were credited as songwriters rather than as lyricists and composers. Lililolol (talk) 17:37, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Dahyun, you may be blocked from editing. You are missing the point: secondary sourcing doesn't just verify, it also establishes whether information is worth including in the first place. Drmies (talk) 02:00, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies How is it poorly sourced? Isn't KMCA a good source? Also, Dahyun isn't the only K-pop page that includes songwriting in its discography section; why aren't you removing the others that use the KMCA source as well? What's the problem with KMCA as a source tho? Lililolol (talk) 02:45, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies Also, it seems that you're threatening me with a block before starting a conversation about war edits. Like what? Lililolol (talk) 02:47, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a secondary source. See Secondary source. I apologize for not fixing every single article on Wikipedia over the weekend. Drmies (talk) 13:25, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rosie vinyl (vampirehollie edition clear).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rosie vinyl (vampirehollie edition clear).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hey, just a heads up: it'd be really helpful if you could try leave a brief edit summary every time you make an edit. It makes things a lot easier on fellow editors when looking through edit histories. H:FIES

Thank you! RachelTensions (talk) 21:46, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sakura Miyawaki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]