User talk:Likisa

June 2024

Hello, I'm Wiiformii. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been disallowed by an edit filter as they did not appear constructive. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. If you believe the edit filter disallowance was a false positive, please report it here. Feel free to ask for assistance at the Teahouse whenever you like. Thank you. Wiiformii (talk) 16:15, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Salp have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Salp was changed by Likisa (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953445 on 2024-07-12T19:31:06+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:31, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. PhilKnight (talk) 15:59, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Likisa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

1. I'm not a sockpuppet.

2. Who the hell is Wagner?

3. My "im a alt of Bloxxer" i meant BloxxerWhat. That was blocked i think. (Relevant discussion)

Likisa (talk) 20:57, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I have unblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 03:37, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(non-admin, random editor comment):

I'm going to repost what I said on Dclemens1971's talk page in support of this user:

Wagner and his socks have not edited here since 2012-2013, and I think it is pretty unlikely they would come back after 11 years and edit in a completely different topic area (video games for Wagner, but Turkish articles for Likisa; just compare the contribs). Likisa also seems to be ESL and so what they meant by alt of Bloxxer could have been BloxxerWhat instead, as they claim in their unblock request. That was simply lost in translation. Them being BloxxerWhat would fit better, as BloxxerWhat also has interest in subject matter related to Turkey.

I'm not sure if PhilKnight confirmed this by CheckUser, but an SPI case wasn't opened when it should have been. Not really ideal to make blind accusations like this without evidence. If the sockpuppetry was indeed confirmed by CU, then I apologize. But personally, I think the case would fall flat on its face because there simply aren't compelling diffs that would imply WP:DUCK behavior to connect Likisa to Wagner and his socks.

I'm sorry, but until it is proven otherwise, this was simply a bad block based on unfounded accusations. — That Coptic Guy^{ping me!} (talk) (contribs) 02:54, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In my defense, they did say they were an alternative account of Bloxxer, which is a blocked account. How was I to know they meant BloxxerWhat? Anyway, unblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 03:37, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All good. Thanks for unblocking this user, Phil. The behavioral comparison and a CU just would've been useful is all (I know CU use is pretty restrictive, though; but I'm sure it could've been justified). — That Coptic Guy^{ping me!} (talk) (contribs) 03:40, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit history seems to have a lot of reverts

I was responding to this edit request, which complained about your removing of valid inter-wiki links.

I don't know... maybe you should look through the Wikipedia: namespace more often.⸺(Random)staplers 00:34, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Likisa (talk) 11:14, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is there going to be a article of Yuri Smirnov? Likisa (talk) 11:17, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How i was i able to know Yuri Smirnov had a article? Also i don't speak Russian so i didn't know it. Likisa (talk) 11:24, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]