This is anarchiveof past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on thecurrent talk page.
Thanks for the Knulclunk page so quickly. Actually, that was my (knulclunk's) edit, from a non-logged in machine. I wanted to see how a {{subst:uw-vandalism1|PageName}} message would show up on an IP machine. You know, when we warn vandals, if they don't have an account, do they ever SEE our warnings? or are the warnings just for other editors to see the history of an IP editor's behavior?
Could you throw another message at this IP's talk page? I'd like to see if a message pops up here. Thanks! --66.108.187.16401:48, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Congrats on completing your 3rd quilt! Since your page is a regular target for vandals, I'll make you a request on the Anit-VandalBot requests page (with your consent, of course). Off to whack a vandal, ~Magnusanimum(aka Steptrip)19:33, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
In that case, I'll make a request for both. I noticed you changed your signature ... how do you like my new one (I had my account renamed from Steptrip to Magnus animum)? ~Magnusanimum(aka Steptrip)21:40, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have understood that you are active on the wiki trying to maintain the quality of the wiki - an admirative occupation. Being not so skilled in "wikipedia" culture and social system, I was wondering if you could help out either fixing or removing the article about FON. As it currently stands I think it would fit the "speedy deletion" requirements.
How do you make your user page say if you are online or not I have been trying to get mine to do that for ages!! leave me a message. Cheers Kinglou13522:38, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The white space increased to my pleasure. I wasn't all the pleasure had with re-spotting of text. AVOID PLZ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.96.212.147 (talk)
I apologise again, I have seemingly added this entry in the wrong place. Sorry for any convenience.
Many apologies Kamope, I do not know what came over me; it must have been the adrenaline rush of Manchester United beating AC Milan with an absolute howitzer from Wayne Rooney, I hope you were watching. What did you think of the game mate? Wwwhhheeeyyy.
The guy who's been vandalizing my userpages vandalized only 1 minute after the last warning, so blocking him wouldn't really be fair (ie. he might not have seen the last warning). Thanks anyways. (And good job by the way). :-) · AndonicOTalk21:10, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Does it get vandalized often? By the way, another admin blocked the user, so I've asked about it. (These tools are confusing... ;)) · AndonicOTalk21:17, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot06:28, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I offered my help to Shark kid. I hope he is not blocked yet. This user shows a good educational background, although his edits were rather questionable. Please keep in mind that we do have more strange people around than you usually meet on the streets. Greetings Wandalstouring17:34, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Lights, for your constructive comments in my recent RFA, which passed with 86 support, 8 oppose, and 5 neutral !votes. I will keep in mind all your suggestions and/or concerns, and will try to live up to your standards. Please, if you have any comments or complaints about my actions as an administrator, leave a note on my talk page, and I will respond as soon as I possibly can, without frying my brain, of course.
Thank you once more,
· AndonicOTalk
Thank you for also notcing that User:72.84.236.148 is a vandal, but it has been identified that they belong to a company. So how shall we block/ban this user?
R_Orange20:04, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think I did edit this page and I can't find what I am supposed to have written — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.153.142.101 (talk) 00:15, 7 May 2007
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot06:20, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, thanks for removing vandalism from my user's talk page. But I think I will keep getting vandalism from that IP forever... Do you know if there is something that I can do to stop it? --giandrea12:02, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well thank you then, I only started doing this because I was trying to read up on an article and there was some bad vandalism in it so here I am!! Cheers!
Hi, I got a message from you concerning Calcium Carbonate? I've never visted that page and neither has anyone at my IP address ( I run a Proxy server which logs all out-bound requests ) I'm by no means offended I just wondered why?
86.130.57.15322:01, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, Mysty! :) Thank you for the wonderful gift and the compliment if using my design - please, do so, and I hope it serves you weell :) I didn't know you had changed your username, btw; I still remember you as Kamope, but the new name is beautiful. Again, thank you, and I hope you've had a wonderful weekend. Take care! Love, Phaedriel - 23:41, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You reverted some vandalism, yet you still left some on the page. I have rectified this now. Thanks (I make mistakes like this all the time...) Y4kk22:36, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Clyde, for some reason, the contents of the nav boxes at your userpage bleed out and overlap the contents of the others... can I fix it for you, sweetie? I can also tidy the awards section a little if you wish... let me know if I can stick my hands in your userpage for you! ;) Love, Phaedriel - 02:21, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Excuse me? Please direct me to the page that i have supposedly vandalized. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.5.196.238 (talk) 13:01, 22 May 2007
he reverted my edit saying that i imposed vandalism!!how am i suppose to respond to that if is not true. I been editing the dominican Articles for months and now he tells me i did vandalism!great Job Buddy!EdwinCasadoBaez01:29, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Um the reason they said i wrote vandalism is because i wrote information in the article after someone else vandalized it. This made me seem as the one that vandalize! If You see in My Contribution page you'll see that i never been acussed by vandalism before and now some annoymous IP adress comes up and reverts my edits accusing me of vandalism!for this reason i reacted negatively towards this IP address. Is not fair when you get blamed for others and especially when you know a lot of the topic and you do a long edit and then they revert it to the last one. That sort of gets me Pissed off and i hoped it doesn't happen again. I'm about to ask for Semi-Protection of the Article Dominican Republic to avoid Anonymous IP's to edit!sorry if anybody got offended by my comments!EdwinCasadoBaez02:26, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I reverted your deletion of comments made be EdwinCasadoBaez. I'd like to show the extreme behavior and irrational thinking that seems to becoming as a result of objective material that is being placed in the article. From the removal of words like [[mulatto] because it is now considered to be in the same league as negro and oriental, to the use of listings of abuses that occurred and were documented in the dominican republic by [[amnesty international] [2]. To research from the CCNY Dominican Institute stating that the population is 90% of african ancestry. I have been met with replies such as "Stop trying to portray the whole of DR as if it were Zambia or Gabon, because it isn't. Is not that it is " bad " to be dark skin African, but that is just the fact." "" Mulatto", wether is considered " offensive" , that is subjective. Stop imposing North American " political correctness". "So stop this " all the America's is Kinta Kunte syndrome". Study some history before." [3] . All in all maintaining a constructive and neutral article is what is being attempted. It seems as if several highly patriotic members feel as if many things is an attack on them or their culture, when it's actually being neutal. 64.131.205.11103:57, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure that I agree that a warning needed to be left for this user. I certainly don't agree with labeling their edit as vandalism. One of the top stories on fark.com is about this news report, which links directly to the Emo (slang) page. It shouldn't be too difficult to AGF and think that this new user simply was trying to warn people that higher than average vandalism is likely on the way. --OnoremDil11:52, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for leaving a new message. It did look kind of like a nonsense edit. I might have reacted the same way, but I had noticed the story on Fark and I was planning on watching the article a little more closely than usual this morning. Looks like you're racking up the reverts this morning, so I'll leave you alone now to continue the good work. Thanks again. --OnoremDil12:12, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Further vandalism of Home nations. I looked at the details of his vandalism of Keithgreens home page. It was not merely vandalism, "Hun" is a term of sectarian abuse in Northern Ireland.GordyB12:17, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it is good if you use "Please don't vandalize here, it will only get you in trouble" on your userpage. I got this message by copying the Template:IndefBlocked template onto my user talk page then editing the template. NHRHS2010 Talk 23:20, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much for the beautiful gift and the lovely June wishes, dear Mysty! You gave me such a big, pleasant smile with your lovely gesture. I don't have to tell you, may you also have a wonderful month... nay, a wonderful rest of 2007! (and I don't say a wonderful life just so I can wish you well at the end of the year! ;)
Mysty, remember I told you the userboxes section at your userpage wasn't displaying correctly? I've uploaded this image so you could see what I meant. I went ahead and fixed it for you, but if you don't like it, please feel free to revert! :) I created a new subpage for your userboxes at User:Mystytopia/Userboxes, and split it from Husond's WikiTower. Everything should work just fine now.
Once again, thank you, dear - you are wonderful! ;) Love, Phaedriel - 18:35, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for spotting the vandalism on my userpage and reverting it! Much obliged, and I home someday I can return the favour. Thanks again! Grimey10904:53, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I had undone one edit and was heading for the other when you flipped it back. Thank you for getting the edit that I missed. Bobo.11:36, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for reverting vandalism to my user page. By the way, I've decided to block this user as he's an obvious sock of 219.71.242.145, whom I had just blocked. Best regards, Húsönd03:42, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please do as you see fit. There are two very obvious "hissy fits" going on here and POINTy behaviour on all sides. Note that anon editors do not own their talkpage space as IP addresses tend to be pooled - Alison☺11:58, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's not acceptable. However, reverting the talk page comments 1) annoy the guy 2) make it look like you've something to hide. That editor also reported you to AIV, which I considered highly unfair and it has now rightly been removed. However, you need to leave that trail of messages so other editors can review what just happened and judge accordingly. If you've been blanking messages (esp. without comment) it looks bad. - Alison☺12:04, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed one instance of vandalism to your user talk page--you can see it in the edit history. The user sending it has just been blocked for this and other infractions. DGG13:34, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your concern in reference to your message about my alleged personal attack against XLR8TION in the talk page of the Co-Op City article, but I wonder if you sent the same warning to XLR8TION when he insulted other users who made edits to that article which he didn't agree with? All I ask is that you be fair and even handed in issuing warnings against Wikipedians for personal attacks. Thank you! 68.174.26.3212:10, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I made an edit to an article about uk tv presenter Anthony Crank, stating that he was a supporter of Gay Rights and Gay Charities and you removed it saying that is wasn't appropriate or the like, can you tell me why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.10.159.2 (talk)
Sorry this is a school computor and it looks like somone at the school has been mucking around with the computors, if it happens again block them.--193.133.128.20412:30, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
About three hours ago I went to my User:A page and found that it had been blocked
on 2007 June 18 ar 2335pm.
I have another user page, User:Brian Hickey
For the last three hours I have been persuing WP pages related to blocking and cannot
find any reason why I would have been blocked.
I have been Wikipedia editing for about the last month.
Over that time I have created my first two articles and edited about 12 pages largely for the purpose of creating internal links to the two pages I have created.
That is all I have ever had to do with WP apart from avidly reading it.
Thank you very much for your prompt attention to my problem.
Until I received your reply to my message, for hours, I was absolutely lost as to how to get my User:A page unblocked.
You inform me that my User:A page was blocked in May.
This is the first time I know about that.
Although coming from someone who at this point in time, is very ignorant about all this stuff,
maybe the page was blocked then unblocked between times I was visiting the page.
I will now send a message to Naconkantari.
Thanks again.
Brian Hickey--Brian Hickey00:39, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
After my second message to you, I went thru WP pages on blocking and came across something about testing blocks by using the Sandbox. I then went to my User:A edit page which displayed a sentence saying User:A page was blocked. I wrote a few words over this entry, clicked save and up came User:A page. I expected to find the horrible big red round icon in a rectangular box. BUT IT WAS GONE. I gather the page had been vandalised causing you, Mystytopia, and Naconkantari, apart from myself, to have wasted time on the matter.
Sorry for not solving it myself. I am on a steep learning curve with WP. I am becoming more dedicated to WP. I know you and your associates are very dedicated.
If I can help in any way in the matter, contact me.
Best wishes,--Brian Hickey02:06, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wait a minute your not an admin, are you sure? I'm sure I've see you do some admin actions, if you want someone to nom you I'm more than happy to. --LwarfTalk!12:31, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not an administator. Did you think I was using the admin rollback when reverting vandalism? The edit summary of the script I use is very simalar and has a rollback button, except the edit summary that the script rollback button gives doesn't have "(talk)" in it, it just has a link to the users contributions. ≈ Mystytopia20:22, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know what made me think your an admin (i think I got the impresion when I was fairly new and it just stuck with me), do you wan't to be an admin? --LwarfTalk!03:44, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for dealing with these users for me. Apparently, I suspect them to be sockpuppets of Charlie.somerville, due to their contribution patterns, and I've made a case about him that you might be interested in. Again, thanks. :) --AAA! (AAAA) 03:23, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations on finding my secret page! I started out with this one, and will make a harder one in the future, and have them get harder as I go on ("secret page 2", "secret page 3", etc.). I'll let you know when "secret page 2" goes into effect. Cheers! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hmwith (talk • contribs) 15:39, 24 June 2007
Hey there Mystytopia! I noticed you doing some "RC patrol" (you recently reverted some vandalism on my watchlist) and I just wanted to drop you a line to thank you for spending some of your valuable time helping out the project! Cheers mate gaillimhConas tá tú?11:28, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think blanking the userpage was the right thing, since it was a redirect to an article. However, if User:LKDS had actually created a userpage, with info, ect., then blanking it would be the wrong thing. Cheers,Mystytopia00:32, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That was so incredibly sweet, my dear Mysty - thank you! :) May you have a wonderful July... nay, a marvelous year! :) Love you, friend. Phaedriel - 16:43, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
~ Magnus animum (aka Steptrip) 21:46, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
12:02, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
19:50, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Done - Alison ☺ 01:20, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Done ;) I reblocked him for a month. His block was expiring later today. -- lucasbfr talk 22:23, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
