User talk:LiebeZenPeace
Welcome
[edit]
|
Citing Sources
[edit]Thanks for your collaboration on the COVID-19 pandemic in Argentina page, and helping with the addition of information. Please note that references you add must be added with templates. If you need more help, please ask or consult at WP:CS (and Template:Cite news).
Thanks! emaponche 16:41, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. MewMeowth (talk) 11:20, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
June 2020
[edit] Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Dogon people, you may be blocked from editing. You also used an alleged Zulu shaman as a source, which completely fails WP:RS. Doug Weller talk 09:51, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
This page might help you with your drafts
[edit]WP:What Wikipedia is not, especially WP:NOTTRAVEL. Doug Weller talk 09:14, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Nicolás Morás for deletion
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nicolás Morás is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicolás Morás until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creepTalk 22:38, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
July 2020
[edit]![Information icon](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/28/Information.svg/25px-Information.svg.png)
Hello LiebeZenPeace. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Nicolás Morás, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:LiebeZenPeace. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=LiebeZenPeace|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. scope_creepTalk 08:35, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hello @Scope creep:, thank you for the clarification, of course I will respond, I do not receive any contribution, I understand that you have lent to the misinterpretation of the event, regarding that was the first thing I answered on that discussion page, here, if it is necessary that I replied here for formalities and / or internal policy I will have no problem. LiebeZenPeace (talk) 05:02, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. scope_creepTalk 19:01, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi @LiebeZenPeace: The discussion on this has been closed, and its now archived. You don't update it, once the discussion has closed and archived. I've reverted your changes. scope_creepTalk 19:01, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Scope creep: sorry, now i get it. LiebeZenPeace (talk) 19:05, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- My first article was deleted, and I wasn't happy about it either. I think your an excellent editor and my advice to you, is to write more articles, if you plan to stay. scope_creepTalk 19:15, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Scope creep: sorry, now i get it. LiebeZenPeace (talk) 19:05, 2 August 2020 (UTC)