Jump to content

User talk:Lichtfouse

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello Lichtfouse, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! B1atv 12:52, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

October 2007

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, one or more of the external links you added to the page Green chemistry do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. B1atv 12:51, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Agroecology. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. B1atv 13:08, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thnak you for the entry you have placed on this list. Tp keep high standards, we determined some time ago that all new entries would be dicussed on the talk page to determine whether they should be retained or deleted. The discussion is at Talk:List of important publications in chemistry, a page that starts with the criteria for inclusion. I have started this debate off on that talk page. There are some clear problems. You seem to be the first author, so there is a clear conflict of interest. I have suggested that it is crucial to overcome that conflict for there to be placed in the list a third party independent source that confirms the notability and importance of this book. Without that I believe the entry should not be retained. Please take a look at the discussion on the talk page. --Bduke (talk) 10:10, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 16:29, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]