User talk:Levyitau

This is Levyitau's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:GCL has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:GCL. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:29, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I edited accordingly. Levyitau (talk) 14:53, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The page "Draft:GCL" (links | edit) has been moved to "Draft:Global coordination measure".

In the wikipedia GCL disambiguation page I have added the Global coordination measure value.

Thanks! Levyitau (talk) 14:56, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Global coordination level (January 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33139959/, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9085802/, https://www.networkscienceinstitute.org/talks/orr-levy. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Global coordination level may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Kvng (talk) 23:28, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. I did not notice that. I rewrote the sections that were repeating pieces of sentences from the original papers and I revised the whole text.

Hope that my revision would be good and beneficial for the community. Levyitau (talk) 21:23, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Levyitau! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~Kvng (talk) 23:28, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 11:39, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Global coordination level (April 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Compusolus was:

This article still has ~57% similarity with the following source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33139959/. It should be expanded more to reduce similarity before resubmitting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Global coordination level and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Compusolus (talk) 12:38, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hello, Levyitau. We welcome your contributions, but it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to research published by a small group of researchers.

Editing in this way is a violation of the policy against using Wikipedia for promotion and is a form of conflict of interest in Wikipedia – please see WP:SELFCITE and WP:MEDCOI. The editing community considers excessive self-citing to be a form of spamming on Wikipedia (WP:REFSPAM); the edits will be reviewed and the citations removed where it was not appropriate to add them.

Scientific articles should prefer secondary sources to ensure that the information added is trusted by the scientific community.

The editing community highly values expert contributors, so I do hope you will consider contributing more broadly. If you wish to contribute, please first consider citing review articles written by other researchers in your field and which are already highly cited in the literature. If you wish to cite your own research, please start a new section on the article's talk page and add {{request edit}} to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added.

MrOllie (talk) 01:26, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand how did you conclude it.

This is not true.

I am working on a large variety of contributions and would highly appreciate if you could enlighten me where I have been adding citations to a small research group. Levyitau (talk) 10:29, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We discussed this on the last account you used. MrOllie (talk) 12:06, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear MrOllie,

I am a researcher at Yale University and I am an expert on network science and ecology and its applications, and I am very surprised by your decisions.

I completely understand your point, but I also fully disagree with your decision that hurts the community of Wikipedia readers (as you saw for example in Human Microbiome).

I seems that we will not agree on this case, that you delete my contributions. Neither one of us will give up on his truth, thus I would like to appeal to a third party.

Could you please tell me what is the recommended procedure in this case?

Best regards, Levyitau (talk) 13:41, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Global coordination level has been accepted

Global coordination level, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

StartOkayStop (talk) 01:38, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]