User talk:Leomarvey

This is Leomarvey's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Liao Wang (February 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robertsky were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:RESUME as well.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Liao Wang and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 14:35, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Leomarvey! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – robertsky (talk) 14:35, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dennylo (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://diarioesports.com/dennylo-biography-2023-bio-profile-history/. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Dennylo may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 10:12, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Dennylo

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Dennylo has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from diarioesports.com/dennylo-biography-2023-bio-profile-history. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. Primefac (talk) 10:39, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a paid editor

Just wanted to leave this here for the record. I have some experience recognizing editors doing Wikipedia editing for pay, and this is definitely one of those. Fred Zepelin (talk) 01:10, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What? No, definitely not, I'm just doing what I think I can to make articles better. I'm not paid by anyone. Do your research. Leomarvey (talk) 02:01, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What I detest most is being accused of what I'm clearly not, don't do that! Leomarvey (talk) 07:59, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just reviewed the draft at Draft:Kavitha Bhatia; that was a hot mess of promotional material, press releases and gushing puffery. Just to be clear - you are claiming that you are not declaring any WP:COI or WP:PAID relationship with that article? Sam Kuru (talk) 14:55, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, after looking at other open and deleted articles, you've used fake/backhat SEO sources to create obvious PR/spam articles across a veriety of obscure non-notable topics and biographies. This is clearly a UDPE account and has been blocked as violation of our terms of service. Sam Kuru (talk) 15:02, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please elaborate more on this. Leomarvey (talk) 15:59, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean it was a hot mess of promotional material? Can you point out the parts that are promotional? Don't air me Leomarvey (talk) 15:57, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: REKA Pictures (May 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheChunky was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:REKA Pictures and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 07:13, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #73486

is closed. User must read and heed WP:COI and WP:PAID. I find the use of fake references reprehensible. There is no way anyone could honestly say they thought that was an acceptable practice. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:31, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would oppose unblocking. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:33, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't get me wrong, I am not paid by anyone and I didn't know they were fake references. I didn't even know what fake references meant, but now, I think I do. Leomarvey (talk) 15:41, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In case there was any doubt, check the differences between these two versions. It's essentially the same content added by Leomarvey recently and the blocked sockpuppet Smartthathay back in November. Some of the sections were swapped, some text was moved around, some synonyms are subbed in, but they slipped up in the Philanthropy section, where "with upwards of 40,000 killed, Senator Carraro headed up a disaster trauma relief team assembled from the United States that arrived with medical doctors and supplies assessing the damage and helping those who were displaced; bringing water purification units and sleeping tents and cots and toilet facilities" is word-for-word. This probably goes back even farther to the User:Ugochukwu75 account but who knows at this point. Fred Zepelin (talk) 18:18, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But I really don't have anything to do with any of these above listed accounts. Sincerely. Leomarvey (talk) 18:45, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kavitha Bhatia (June 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DreamRimmer was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kavitha Bhatia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DreamRimmer (talk) 11:04, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:REKA Pictures

Hello, Leomarvey. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:REKA Pictures, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]