User talk:Leksijensen
References
[edit]
Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:54, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- Doc James and other people claim that the article on Electrohypersensitivity (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Electromagnetic_hypersensitivity) is neutral. It's not at all - rather scientifically flawed, as such informations as the EUROPAEM EU doctors guidelines and facts about disability recognisition in several countries and existing diagnoses on EHS keeps being deleted by certain users. That's clear vandalism. You can see my sandbox here where I have made my edit on Electrohypersensitivity that is a handicap and a diagnosis in certain countries because EMFs are of course dangerous according to up to 25,000 studies according to the Swedish Professor Olle Johansson from Karolinska.
- They clearly write outdated content that relates to Electrophobia and not EHS, which is why the article needs a thorough edit, please look here:
- Here is the correct and UPDATED article on EHS/Electrohypersensitivity https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Leksijensen/sandbox — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leksijensen (talk • contribs) 12:46, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions alert
[edit]
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding pseudoscience and fringe science, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.MfD nomination of User:Leksijensen/sandbox
[edit]
User:Leksijensen/sandbox, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Leksijensen/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Leksijensen/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. --Guy Macon (talk) 14:50, 2 February 2017 (UTC)