User talk:Leito.Cmj

Your article Abadía de Rufford

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Abadía de Rufford to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. TJH2018 talk 19:02, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Abadía de Rufford

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Abadía de Rufford. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Rufford Abbey. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Rufford Abbey – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Valenciano (talk) 19:07, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Hello, I'm Gladamas. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Abadía de Rufford with this edit without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. –Gladamas^talk 21:58, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Your edit to Thomas Howard, 4th Duke of Norfolk has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 21:26, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Leito.Cmj, I'm DanCherek and I am a Wikipedia administrator. I realize that it has been frustrating to see the text at Thomas Howard, 4th Duke of Norfolk removed and redacted, especially after you said that tudorpalace.com.ar has given you the authorization to use it on Wikipedia. However, we have an established protocol at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials#Granting us permission to copy material already online that editors need to follow in situations like these. Essentially, the copyright holder can either modify their website to indicate that the material is compatibly licensed, or they can correspond with a Wikipedia volunteer who is a part of a team called the Volunteer Response Team (VRT), who will confirm that they are the copyright owner and have taken the necessary steps. One of those two verification procedures needs to happen before the text on that website can be added to any article. It's not that we disbelieve you, but this is needed to ensure that all protocols are properly followed. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 23:39, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Your edit to Thomas Howard, 4th Duke of Norfolk has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 21:52, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Henry Howard, Earl of Surrey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hans Holbein. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Philip Howard, 13th Earl of Arundel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Strand.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent contributions to Thomas Howard, 4th Duke of Norfolk

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Thomas Howard, 4th Duke of Norfolk. Mister WOGnam (talk) 08:28, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for the notice. I don't destroy anything, I just like to collaborate because I always admired the interesting and tragic story of the Duke. Leito.Cmj (talk) 08:31, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I want to contribute in the best possible way. Leito.Cmj (talk) 08:33, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, might I suggest not posting content copyrighted elsewhere? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:42, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Deepfriedokra the blockade was a fair measure but I feel that I have already fulfilled my punishment, I am ready to rejoin and I have sworn that I will never commit Copyright violations again because I have already read the Wikipedia rules and now I am going to comply with those rules with great devotion and responsibility , while also respecting fellow Wikipedians. And I write in both languages (in English and in my native Spanish) because I express myself better in Spanish, being South American. My English is kind of clumsy. Leito.Cmj (talk) 02:56, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent contributions to Thomas Howard, 4th Duke of Norfolk

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Thomas Howard, 4th Duke of Norfolk. Mister WOGnam (talk) 08:28, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for the notice. I don't destroy anything, I just like to collaborate because I always admired the interesting and tragic story of the Duke. Leito.Cmj (talk) 08:32, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I want to contribute in the best possible way. Leito.Cmj (talk) 08:33, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore them, they are a vandal. I suggest deleting these from your talk page. Muhandes (talk) 08:37, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am not a vandal, I am simply a humble historian who also teaches, being a history teacher at a High School here in Argentina and I want to give my best contributions to history. Leito.Cmj (talk) 08:41, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not you, the other editor is a vandal. They randomly undo edits and leave "warnings. I suggest you delete both of these "warnings" from your talk page. Muhandes (talk) 08:44, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are absolutely right, friend Muhandes, that Mister WOGnam only threatens and threatens when we try to correct a specific point in history. I am a historian who loves to make specific and concrete contributions. Leito.Cmj (talk) 16:16, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Your edit to Henry Howard, Earl of Surrey has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 15:23, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the corrections. Leito.Cmj (talk) 15:45, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Leito.Cmj, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as LuisCanelo.MJ (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Celia Homeford (talk) 09:31, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The guy uploaded a portrait of a woman that remains unnamed as the Duchess of Norfolk. I’ve had to edit several pages and take the portrait out. Lady Meg (talk) 16:14, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Lady Meg the portrait was uploaded by the user @LuisCanelo.MJ and by the way there is some advice for Luis: the next time you upload a portrait, check the source if it is about such a person or not, because they can suspend you from Wikipedia. It's good advice, don't take it badly or anything, it's just advice so that you do better and have a better relationship with Wikipedians. Greetings. Leito.Cmj (talk) 17:05, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello people @Lady Meg @Leito.Cmj and fellow Wikipedians, good afternoon from this side of the world. I admit I made a mistake, but I was mainly guided by this video on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YStjSMK_Sxc . If the video is unreliable, let me know and I will try not to watch any more sites with unreliable sources. Greetings from Chile. LuisCanelo.MJ (talk) 17:23, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Those videos on that channel are like sensational videos. There’s no source confirming the identity of that portrait in the video. I still don’t understand where the portrait came from. Did you take a screenshot? There is no portrait of the Duchess by Joos Ban Cleve. The guy was living in Antwerp. Don’t think he ever went to England. Lady Meg (talk) 07:12, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

joos van cleve

Lady Meg (talk) 07:13, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Lady Meg good morning from this part of the world. As a historian and university history professor (I also clarify that I have Howard family ancestry from my maternal grandmother, descending from the Effingham branch) I am always guided by other study webpages like this one: https://thefreelancehistorywriter.com/2017 /08/25/elizabeth-stafford-duchess-of-norfolk/ . The same portrait is also on that webpage. Knowing and contributing about my ancestral family is great and if I made a mistake, I want to remedy it so I don't have problems and look good with fellow Wikipedians since I use Wikipedia a lot to prepare the papers that I later give to the students of the chair in which I teach (world history) in Legal Law (Legal Sciences or Bar) at the Universidad Católica de Chile. Greetings from Santiago de Chile. LuisCanelo.MJ (talk) 09:09, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you boasting about something that probably can’t be proved? I’m so tired of people claiming descent from these people because the internet says so. If you actually GO TO THE website you provided you will see that she labels the portrait: “Portrait of a Woman, dated 1520 by the Netherlandish painter Joos van Cleve (1507-1541)” I personally know the author. Lady Meg (talk) 06:26, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning @Lady Meg, I do not brag or brag about anything and lately I have been doing things well so as not to have problems with fellow Wikipedians who contribute so much to this beautiful encyclopedia, which helps me a lot to prepare the study topics that I later deliver to my students of the chair (World History) where I teach, within the framework of the Legal Sciences career (law) at the Catholic University of Chile. Greetings from Santiago de Chile.

Buenos días, yo no me jacto ni presumo de nada y últimamente vengo haciendo las cosas bien para no tener problemas con los compañeros wikipedistas que tanto aportan a esta hermosa enciclopedia, la cual me ayuda muchísimo a preparar los temas de estudio que luego entrego a mis alumnos de la cátedra (Historia Mundial) donde doy clases, en el marco de la carrera de Ciencias Jurídicas (abogacía) en la Universidad Católica de Chile. Saludos desde Santiago de Chile.

I write to you both in my native Spanish and in English. LuisCanelo.MJ (talk) 11:42, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Agnes Howard, Duchess of Norfolk into Thomas Howard, 3rd Duke of Norfolk. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Ninja Diannaa (Talk) 14:54, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Hello, I'm Trainsandotherthings. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Seaboard System Railroad, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 15:20, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Trainsandotherthings the unit CSX #1982 has just gone into service. Source: https://www.facebook.com/100064785813730/posts/658178709684984/?mibextid=rS40aB7S9Ucbxw6v Leito.Cmj (talk) 16:01, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is not a reliable source. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 16:02, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect. Now I'm going to redo the note but quoting the two reliable sources of information I got: Trains Magazine and the official CSX website itself. Leito.Cmj (talk) 16:16, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Thomas Howard, 3rd Duke of Norfolk has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 12:35, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thank you very much for the warning. Greetings. Leito.Cmj (talk) 14:52, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly it hurts me that articles as beautiful as that one are eliminated but hey, copyright must be respected. Leito.Cmj (talk) 18:33, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hola @Diannaa good evening, with all due respect I think it is unfair that the user @Leito.Cmj who has made so many contributions about my ancestral Howard family (I am very surprised of what he knows, which is a lot and I congratulate to him for that big knowledge) is going to be blocked for copyright violation.

Do you know how many authorship violations I saw on Wikipedia? Many and many of those publications turn a blind eye.

Hola @Diannaa buenas tardes, con todo respeto yo creo que es injusto que al usuario @Leito.Cmj que tantos aportes ha hecho sobre mi familia ancestral Howard (estoy muy sorprendido de lo que el sabe, que es mucho y lo felicito por esos conocimientos) vayan a bloquearlo violación de derechos de autor.

Sabes cuantas violaciones de autoría vi en Wikipedia? Muchas y a muchas de esas publicaciones le hacen la vista gorda.

I express myself both in my native Spanish and in English to show my discontent about this threat made to this user, whom I would love to meet personally to congratulate him for his knowledge of Howard, my ancestral family. Greetings from Chile. CarlosSwinforeHoward (talk) 23:32, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Now you've committed yet another copyright violation; this time, you blatantly stole a copyrighted image from the internet and uploaded it as your own work, and then added it to an article. My patience is fast wearing out with your repeated copyright violations. Any further ones and I will be reporting you to ANI for an indefinite block. Again, this is your last warning. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:38, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Trainsandotherthings good evening, it is unfair that this user is blocked for something that he could have done innocently and perhaps hastily, without realizing the consequences. Many times we make rude mistakes and we regret it, but a mistake is not a reason for blocking. From mistakes you have to learn to never make them again. CarlosSwinforeHoward (talk) 03:00, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @CarlosSwinforeHoward I thank you with all my heart for defending me. I have made rash mistakes without realizing the consequences. Once again I thank you. Leito.Cmj (talk) 03:03, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has rules, and respecting copyright is among the most important. Your protestations are irrelevant. We all have to follow the rules. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 14:19, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Trainsandotherthings you are right yes, doing things rashly yes, it is ugly and brings adverse consequences. Once again I apologize for my bad behavior. Leito.Cmj (talk) 14:39, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You still don't get it. It doesn't matter if you attributed or not, you still do not have permission to upload images that are not released under a free license. It is becoming clear you lack the competence to edit on Wikipedia. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 00:30, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Si fuera realmente una enciclopedia libre como dice ser, se citaría a todos los autores. Tengo cualidades para editar casi perfectamente pero solo con textos, aunque también a veces tengo mis excesos, como toda persona. Me disculpo una vez más por esto y juro ante las sagradas escrituras que nunca más volveré a cometer errores groseros y graves que pueden traerme consecuencias adversas. @Trainsandotherthings you'll see that this time I'm going to behave well. Greetings and a big hug from Argentina. Leito.Cmj (talk) 00:52, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The only reason I haven't hauled you off to ANI is that I'm extremely tired and need to be up at 5 am tomorrow. If I see another copyright violation by you, you will not be so lucky. STOP uploading photos that you do not have the rights to, IMMEDIATELY. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 00:54, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You will see that I am going to behave well... I make the promise and I am going to fulfill it to the letter. Leito.Cmj (talk) 00:56, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Thomas Howard, 3rd Duke of Norfolk

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Thomas Howard, 3rd Duke of Norfolk, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:21, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Your edit to Philip Howard, 13th Earl of Arundel has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. The4lines |||| ^{(Talk) (Contributions)} 17:26, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is far from the first time you've been warned. What do you not understand about not copying other's people's work? Did the last conversation with Trainsandotherthings not make you realize that you will be blocked? You clearly do not understand what you're doing wrong. You can not be violating copyright at all. I think you have used all your chances up. I'm sorry but I do not think you're fit to be editing here. The4lines |||| ^{(Talk) (Contributions)} 17:38, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DanCherek (talk) 17:38, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to do this as I know you are editing in good faith, but you were given a final copyright warning recently and advised that further violations would result in a block, and you are continuing to copy-and-paste from other websites, as at Philip Howard, 13th Earl of Arundel. DanCherek (talk) 17:40, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've been wanting to leave Wikipedia for a long time... If only there were, as in other places (Facebook or Twitter for example), an option for the user to leave Wikipedia, it would be the best for me since I have my job, my time and a family to maintain and that is why lately I edit little... If you do me the great favor of being able to stop being a user of this place, I will be grateful. I sincerely thank everyone who cooperated with me in the editions, but I have made the decision to want to leave Wikipedia. Leito.Cmj (talk) 17:44, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've been wanting to leave Wikipedia for a long time... If only there were, as in other places (Facebook or Twitter for example), an option for the user to leave Wikipedia, it would be the best for me since I have my job, my time and a family to maintain and that is why lately I edit little... If you do me the great favor of being able to stop being a user of this place, I will be grateful. I sincerely thank everyone who cooperated with me in the editions, but I have made the decision to want to leave Wikipedia. Leito.Cmj (talk) 17:43, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Help

@DanCherek Hello Dan, I've been wanting to leave Wikipedia for a long time... If only there were, as in other places (Facebook or Twitter for example), an option for the user to leave Wikipedia, it would be the best for me since I have my job, my time and a family to maintain and that is why lately I edit little... If you do me the great favor of being able to stop being a user of this place, I will be grateful. I sincerely thank everyone who cooperated with me in the editions, but I have made the decision to want to leave Wikipedia.

If you guarantee me the help to leave, you will do me the best and biggest favour of my life. Leito.Cmj (talk) 17:54, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to leave, then just log out, simple as that. If you wish to edit at any point in the future, you will need to log back in and appeal the block on this account (as editing without logging in, or creating a new account, will be considered block evasion). DanCherek (talk) 17:58, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DanCherek thank you very much for the answer. Maybe in the future I will appeal the block but for now I will be retiring from Wikipedia for a long, long time. Greetings Leito.Cmj (talk) 18:07, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @DanCherek I just made the appeal of the existing block, where I took the task of writing both in English and in my native Spanish, commenting that I have already learned from the error and if it is unblocked, I will be a productive member of the community, adding more information to the existing articles and taking care not to stumble again because I already learned the situation.

To many of those who were angry with me for having incurred in what led to my being blocked, I comment that I perfectly understand the anger and concerns about what happened, I became aware of it and you will see that from the moment I am unblocked I will be a very productive member of the Wikipedia community.

It was a fair and exemplary punishment, but I have already learned and I sincerely apologize for my mistakes and I will not make them again.

Saludos / Greetings. Leonardo Cristantelmo. Profesor de Historia residente en Argentina. Professor of History resident in Argentina. Leito.Cmj (talk) 04:10, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Parts of your unblock request below were copied from WIPO without the required attribution (the text on that website is licensed under CC BY 4.0), so I think you still have a lot of learning to do before you're ready to contribute. Wikipedia:Copyright violations, Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources, Wikipedia:Plagiarism, Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing, for starters. Plus, there's the question of why these issues persisted after the first five copyright warnings for which you were not blocked? You will need to present a convincing case for why this time is different than the others. DanCherek (talk) 04:20, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @DanCherek I thought that the threats and warnings were not going to be fulfilled but well, unfortunately they were fulfilled due to my ignorance and total lack of responsibility, which luckily I already left behind because I do not want to stumble again and make the same mistakes that led to the blockade.

Regarding the wording of the text on Copyright and what is Copyright, yes, I copied a part to have a better reference and light on the subject, but well, copyright is governed by different laws, whether lax or harsh in each country. Here in Argentina the legislation in force on the subject is very lax, I don't know what regulations Wikipedia is governed by, but hey, I will prepare a better text written by hand with my own words on the subject and I will present it later.

I know and fully understand that you are angry and concerned with me for the situation but believe me, you will see that I will be a better member once I am unblocked.

Hola Dan Cherek, pensaba que las amenazas no se iban a cumplir pero bueno, lamentablemente se cumplieron por mi ignorancia y falta total de responsabilidad, que por suerte ya la he dejado atrás debido a que no quiero volver a tropezar y cometer los mismos errores que llevaron al bloqueo.

Respecto a la redacción del texto sobre el Copyright y que es el Copyright, si, copié una parte para tener una mejor referencia y luz sobre el tema, pero bueno lo de los derechos de autor se rige con diferentes legislaciones ya sean laxas o duras en cada país. Aquí en Argentina son muy laxas las legislaciones vigentes en el tema, no se con que reglamentaciones se rige Wikipedia, pero bueno, ya prepararé un mejor texto escrito a mano con mis propias palabras sobre el tema y lo presentaré más adelante.

Se y entiendo perfectamente que están enfadados y a su vez preocupados conmigo por la situación pero creanme, verán que seré un mejor miembro una vez que sea desbloqueado. I write in both English and my native Spanish, expressing myself better in my language. Escribo tanto en Inglés como en mi español nativo, expresándome mejor en mi idioma. Leito.Cmj (talk) 06:03, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @DanCherek according to the legislation in force here in Argentina (Law 11723 - LEGAL REGIME OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY) on Copyright, enacted for the first time in January 1966 and updated by the Congress (Parliament) of the Nation in 1998, in its article 1st says: For the purposes of this Law, scientific, literary and artistic works They include writings of all kinds and lengths, among them the programs of source and object computing; compilations of data or other materials; the works dramatic, musical, dramatic-musical compositions; the cinematographic ones, choreographic and pantomimic; works of drawing, painting, sculpture, architecture; models and works of art or science applied to commerce or industry; forms, plans and maps; plastics, photographs, engravings and phonograms, in short, all scientific production, literary, artistic or didactic, regardless of the method of reproduction. Copyright protection will cover the expression of ideas, procedures, methods of operation and mathematical concepts but not those ideas, procedures, methods and concepts themselves.

In its articles 3, 4, 5, 5 bis, 6 and 9, Argentine Copyright legislation basically states that the copyright holders are the author(s) of the work, their heirs or successors in title and those who, with with the permission of the author and/or his heirs, translate, reimburse, adapt, modify or transport it over the resulting new intellectual work, and no one shall have the right to publish, without the permission of the authors or their successors, a scientific, literary production , artistic or musical that has been written down or copied during its reading, performance or public or private exhibition. In the case of videos, photos or music, whoever has received a special license from the authors or their right-holders to use said works, may make a single backup copy of original copies thereof. (Paragraph incorporated in the update made in 1998).

If knowing the current legislation in my country on Copyright and having learned from it so as not to make the mistakes I made again helps me so that it can be unlocked, welcome. If it doesn't do me any good, well I'll throw in the towel and give up for good and retire from this beautiful community.

Hola Dan Cherek de acuerdo con la legislación vigente aquí en Argentina (Ley 11723 - RÉGIMEN LEGAL DE LA PROPIEDAD INTELECTUAL) sobre Derechos de Autor, promulgada por primera vez en enero de 1966 y actualizada por el Congreso de la Nación en 1998, en su artículo 1° dice: Para los efectos de esta Ley, obras científicas, literarias y artísticas incluyen escritos de toda clase y extensión, entre ellos los programas de computación fuente y objeto; compilaciones de datos u otros materiales; las obras dramáticas, musicales, composiciones dramático-musicales; los cinematográficos, coreográficos y pantomímicos; obras de dibujo, pintura, escultura, arquitectura; modelos y obras de arte o ciencia aplicadas al comercio o la industria; formularios, planos y mapas; plásticas, fotografías, grabados y fonogramas, en definitiva, toda la producción científica, literaria, artístico o didáctico, independientemente del método de reproducción. La protección de los derechos de autor cubrirá la expresión de ideas, procedimientos, métodos de operación y conceptos matemáticos, pero no esas ideas, procedimientos, métodos y conceptos en sí mismos. En sus artículos 3, 4, 5, 5 bis, 6 y 9, la legislación argentina sobre el Copyright básicamente dice que son titulares del derecho de propiedad intelectual el o los autores de la obra, sus herederos o derechohabientes y quienes los que, con el permiso del autor y/o herederos del mismo, la traducen, refunden, adaptan, modifican o transportan sobre la nueva obra intelectual resultante, y nadie tendrá derecho a publicar, sin permiso de los autores o de sus derechohabientes, una producción científica, literaria, artística o musical que se haya anotado o copiado durante su lectura, ejecución o exposición públicas o privadas. En el caso de videos, fotos o música, quien haya recibido de los autores o de sus derecho-habientes una licencia especial para usar dichas obras, podrá realizar una única copia de salvaguardia de los ejemplares originales del mismo. (Párrafo incorporado en la actualización realizada en 1998).

Si el saber la legislación vigente en mi país sobre Derechos de autor y haber aprendido de la misma para no volver a cometer los errores que cometí me sirve para que pueda ser desbloqueado, bienvenido sea. Si no me sirve de nada, bueno tiraré la toalla y me rendiré definitivamente así ya me retiro esta hermosa comunidad. Leito.Cmj (talk) 15:58, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikimedia Foundation is headquartered in San Francisco and is governed by U.S. copyright law, as explained at Wikipedia:Copyrights. All editors need to adhere to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines on copyright and plagiarism (linked above), regardless of where they are personally based. That means that an editor living in Argentina, is subject to the same policies and guidelines as one living in the U.S., or Europe, or Africa or anywhere else.

Also, I notice that you have been editing the text of your already-declined unblock request below. To make a new unblock request for consideration, you will need to use a new {{unblock}} template, rather than simply edit the old one. DanCherek (talk) 23:48, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank for the info. I have not studied American Copyright laws that well. The Copyright law of my country if I have studied it almost perfectly, but I am going to study those US laws and from there prepare the way to make a new appeal, with the hope of being successful this time. Leito.Cmj (talk) 03:59, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No one is asking you to study the law. You do need to demonstrate an understanding of copyright-related Wikipedia policies and guidelines, which I have linked above. DanCherek (talk) 04:40, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK @DanCherek It's late now here in Argentina, tomorrow I'll take my time when I leave class (I'm a teacher) and I'll prepare the appeal. Greetings. Leito.Cmj (talk) 05:30, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just wrote the appeal in both my native Spanish and English, where I argued that I learned from the mistakes I made (ignoring the warnings about repeated Copyright violation among other gross mistakes) that led to my being punished with the blocking, and where I already swore that I will never make such mistakes again. I have little hope of success with this new request but hey, hope is the last thing to lose. Leito.Cmj (talk) 01:48, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @DanCherek good afternoon, I already presented very strong arguments in the last appeal where I recognized the mistakes made and swore and promised never to make them again and from the moment the blockade is lifted, I will adhere very devotedly to the rules of the Wikipedia community so as not to fall into the same pit of errors again.

I hope the blockade is lifted although I have little hope of success with this new request, hope is the last thing that is lost.

Hola @DanCherek buenas tardes, ya presenté argumentos muy fuertes en la última apelación donde reconocí los errores cometidos y juré y prometí no volver a cometerlos nunca más y desde el momento en que se retire el bloqueo, me apegaré con mucha devoción a las reglas de la comunidad Wikipedia para no volver a caer en el mismo pozo de errores.

Espero que se levante el bloqueo aunque tengo pocas esperanzas de éxito con esta nueva solicitud, la esperanza es lo último que se pierde.

Saludos / Greetings. Leonardo Crisantelmo. Leito.Cmj (talk) 18:54, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @DanCherek good afternoon, since all my unlock requests (the last ones I made correctly and with clear answers) were all rejected, this time I appeal to the good heart of the administrators to unlock me.

I fully understand that many administrators were angry and outraged with me for my reckless attitude, but I have learned my lesson.

I am not going to ask for mercy because I understood that the blockade was a fair measure, something that I also accepted and I recognize that it was fair, because my reckless attitude could have put Wikipedia in danger of receiving legal actions, but I have already learned my lesson and I deserve a new opportunity. Leito.Cmj (talk) 17:56, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #77980

is closed. So very many words, none of which address the reason for the block. As this is the English language Wikipedia, it would probably be for the best if user refrains from posting in Spanish. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:40, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Deepfriedokra I already read the Wikipedia rules and Copyright violation is something very serious. The punishment was fair, I swore never to do bad things here on Wikipedia again so I'm ready for eventual reinstatement. Leito.Cmj (talk) 02:59, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a closed topic, because I have read the Wikipedia rules in relation to copyright and the seriousness of the violation of the same, I understood the serious situation in which I got myself out of ignorance, I swore and promised never to commit copyright violation again and I am ready to be reinstated. Leito.Cmj (talk) 03:52, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The ticket is closed. You need to follow instructions and request unblocking with the unblock ticket

{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You need to clearly and concisely describe what you will and will not do to not introduce copyrighted material to Wikipedia.

In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. To allow the reviewing administrator to assess your understanding, please respond to the following questions in your next unblock appeal, explaining in your own words: What is copyright? How is Wikipedia licensed? Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia? Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content? How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future? Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked.

Thank you for your prompt, clear, and concise attention to this matter. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:14, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, good afternoon, since all my unlock requests (the last ones I made correctly and with clear answers) were all rejected, this time I appeal to the good heart of the administrators to be unlocked. Leito.Cmj (talk) 17:57, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #78318

is closed. Despite a previous warning, Leito.Cmj once again made a request via UTRS despite having an open unblock request here. Leito.Cmj is warned again against this sort of abuse and may lose UTRS access if they continue. --Yamla (talk) 23:03, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Yamla good evening, I made too many requests because apparently they are ignoring or not accepting my humble unlock request. I recognized the mistakes that led to it being blocked, but I deserve one more chance, ¿maybe those of us who have been blocked (I'm not the only one, there are many people who, like me, recklessly made the serious mistake of committing a Copyright violation) don't deserve another chance? I fully understand that many administrators were angry and outraged with me for my reckless attitude, but I have learned my lesson.

This time I am not going to ask for mercy because I know that the blocking is not a punishment, it was a fair measure that they took and I recognize that it was fair, because my reckless attitude could have put Wikipedia in danger of receiving legal action, but I have already learned my lesson and I deserve a new opportunity. Leito.Cmj (talk) 23:29, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't I deserve one more chance? I did everything necessary to get the block lifted and I'm still blocked. Leito.Cmj (talk) 08:47, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Leito.Cmj (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Good afternoon people, presented this new unblocking appeal, having little hope of success but with clear and concise answers I prepared these answers, mainly from the fact of why I deserve to be unblocked:

I request this because I understood the mistakes I made, I understood that the blocking was not a punishment but rather a fair and necessary measure, something that I also accepted and I recognize that it was fair, because my reckless and foolish attitude could have put Wikipedia in serious danger of legal action for Copyright violation, but I have learned my lesson and I deserve a new opportunity.

I fully understand that many administrators were angry and indignant with me for my reckless attitude, but I have learned my lesson.

To all those who were angry with me @DanCherek, @Trainsandotherthings, @Diannaa and many others, I heartily apologize for everything I caused and I appeal to your good faith and willingness to accept me once again here on Wikipedia.

With this sincere and humble request I hope to be unblocked soon. I will not commit any more copyright violations as I have learned from my mistakes.

Greetings. Leonardo Crisantelmo

Decline reason:

It's fine to say that you will never make copyright violations again, but in order to know that for certain you must demonstrate an understanding of copyright as it pertains to Wikipedia. You haven't done that yet. You have improved some in that you recognize that copyright violations potentially put Wikipedia in legal jeopardy, but this doesn't guarantee that the behavior will not repeat, so I must decline your request. 331dot (talk) 13:25, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Leito.Cmj (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Good evening, I once again present this new appeal to the block that has existed on my user since October 2023 for reasons already known. I have understood and perfectly accepted that the block was a fair and necessary measure to avoid getting Wikipedia into trouble, as I have read in the available articles on copyright, and the serious consequences that come with constant copyright violations.

Along with this, I want to sincerely apologize to the administrators whom I offended greatly. As I have already said, I swear that I will never violate copyright again and to avoid falling into the same problem again, I will use only short quotes for edits, in accordance with Wikipedia's non-free content policy and guideline I know perfectly well that copyright violation is a serious matter, and as I have said, I will never make that serious mistake again.

I also admit to have tried to circumvent the block by creating (under the same IP) secondary accounts in very bad faith, but since I read each and every one of Wikipedia's rules regarding the issue of blocking, the causes for which a user can be blocked, and how, in good faith, to act to be welcomed back, I realized that the mistakes I made were rude, and that trying to circumvent them would not help me, on the contrary, it would hurt me. I want to apologize again to the administrators, to the users who got mad at me for the stupid things I did, and I want them to see that I am not bad, I only made the serious mistake mentioned above out of desperation.

With this I want to show that I am ready to reintegrate into the Wikipedia community and follow each and every one of the rules to the letter in order to have a better and excellent treatment and relationship with all users and the administrators, and thus have a peaceful coexistence in this beautiful community.

I know all the things I did were wrong, from copyright violation (the main cause of the block) to trying to get around it by creating secondary accounts, but I've learned my lesson. I appeal to the good hearts of the administrators so that they see that I am not a bad person, that I made mistakes from which I have already learned the lesson, and I look forward with great hope and hope to being able to reintegrate into this beautiful Wikipedian community. And if this appeal is rejected, I will definitely give up and will not file any more appeals for unblocking.

Greetings from Argentina. Leonardo Crisantelmo.

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Leito.Cmj (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Good evening, I once again present this new appeal to the block that has existed on my user since October 2023 for reasons already known. I have understood and perfectly accepted that the block was a fair and necessary measure to avoid getting Wikipedia into trouble, as I have read in the available articles on copyright, and the serious consequences that come with constant copyright violations.

Along with this, I want to sincerely apologize to the administrators whom I offended greatly. As I have already said, I swear that I will never violate copyright again and to avoid falling into the same problem again, I will use only short quotes for edits, in accordance with Wikipedia's non-free content policy and guideline I know perfectly well that copyright violation is a serious matter, and as I have said, I will never make that serious mistake again.

I also admit to have tried to circumvent the block by creating (under the same IP) secondary accounts in very bad faith, but since I read each and every one of Wikipedia's rules regarding the issue of blocking, the causes for which a user can be blocked, and how, in good faith, to act to be welcomed back, I realized that the mistakes I made were rude, and that trying to circumvent them would not help me, on the contrary, it would hurt me. I want to apologize again to the administrators, to the users who got mad at me for the stupid things I did, and I want them to see that I am not bad, I only made the serious mistake mentioned above out of desperation.

With this I want to show that I am ready to reintegrate into the Wikipedia community and follow each and every one of the rules to the letter in order to have a better and excellent treatment and relationship with all users and the administrators, and thus have a peaceful coexistence in this beautiful community.

I know all the things I did were wrong, from copyright violation (the main cause of the block) to trying to get around it by creating secondary accounts, but I've learned my lesson. I appeal to the good hearts of the administrators so that they see that I am not a bad person, that I made mistakes from which I have already learned the lesson, and I look forward with great hope and hope to being able to reintegrate into this beautiful Wikipedian community. And if this appeal is rejected, I will definitely give up and will not file any more appeals for unblocking.

Greetings from Argentina. Leonardo Crisantelmo.

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS appeal #79905

is declined. This user continues to abuse the UTRS system despite one or more previous warnings. --Yamla (talk) 22:45, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note also

Confirmed socks, Louie Stenball, LouisStenball, CarlosSwinforeHoward, and LuisCanelo.MJ. This user is far closer to a community ban under WP:3X than an unblock. I'll go block the sockpuppet accounts now.--Yamla (talk) 22:50, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Leito.Cmj (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Good evening, I have returned to appeal again about the block that has existed on my user for months, for reasons already known. :I have understood and perfectly accepted that the block was a fair measure to avoid getting Wikipedia into trouble, as I have read in the available articles on copyright. :Along with this, I want to sincerely apologize to the administrators whom I offended greatly. :As I have already said, I swear that I will never violate copyright again and to avoid falling into the same problem again, I will use only short quotes for edits, in accordance with Wikipedia's non-free content policy and guideline :I know perfectly well that copyright violation is a serious matter, and as I have said, I will never make that serious mistake again. : :With this I want to show that I am ready to reintegrate into the Wikipedia community and follow each and every one of the rules to the letter in order to have a better treatment and relationship with all users. :Greetings from Argentina. Leonardo Crisantelmo

Decline reason:

You were confirmed to be socking as recently as October when you were also abusing the UTRS appeal system. Based on your appeals so far, this is essentially a defacto ban.—SpacemanSpiff 05:45, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.