User talk:Leigh Bevan Roberts

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Leigh Bevan Roberts, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages; user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you can indicate why the page is not blatant advertising, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: Click here to contest this speedy deletion which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy deletion candidate). Doing so will take you to your user talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also edit this page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would help make it encyclopedic. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 18:33, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --Leigh Bevan Roberts (talk) 18:38, 19 January 2016 (UTC) I had to hit a back button, and half of my entry was deleted before publishing. This is a full biography for composer Leigh Bevan Roberts, and I assure you that this is not spam or self promotion. Leigh's name is linked to many current wikipedia pages for his work as a professional film composer.[reply]

I have deleted it per WP:U5. If you think the draft is viable, please first read WP:42. Good sources mean the difference between an article being viable or not. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:25, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Leigh Bevan Roberts. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Leigh Bevan Roberts, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 22:48, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Please abandon this account and create a new one or visit Wikipedia:Changing username/Simple to change your username. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:53, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]