User talk:Lawrence Waterhouse

Hello, Lawrence Waterhouse, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. Ϣere Spiel Chequers 15:49, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Under preparation

Legality of blades and SAK

Hello Lawrence

I do not doubt that the legality of blades or certain features affects sales of certain SAK models/variants in the concerned legislations.

There is however already a Knife legislation article available on Wikipedia that deals with the possession and carrying of (pocket) knives in several legislations. I doubt the various limitations imposed by the laws were intended to regulate the possession and carrying of Swiss Army Knives in particular. If you like you can refer to the Knife legislation article in the Swiss Army Knife article.--Francis Flinch (talk) 09:48, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Dark Volume

A tag has been placed on The Dark Volume requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Infinit jest ^talk 22:47, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Current Astrobiology Research

Hello Lawrence Waterhouse,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Current Astrobiology Research, may be copied from http://www.redorbit.com/education/reference_library/general-2/journals/1112547785/astrobiology-journal/. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 12:03, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this, even with the article of which it is a part now existing, there is still little to merit an article. Unless you are able to expand it with the necessary references to demonstrate notability I will have to nominate it for deletion at WP:AFD. Similarly International Astrobiology Newsletter (IAN) itself needs some references as well --Jac16888 ^Talk 17:07, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Question Lawrence, could you please explain these articles a bit? I have merged the two, as the text stated that "Current Astrobiology Research" is a subdivision of the "International Astrobiology Newsletter", but on the website of the latter, all I find under "Current Astrobiology Research" is a list of external links. In addition, the CODEN mentioned in the infobox belongs to a completely different journal, Astrobiology (journal). All of the abstracting and indexing seems to be copied from the latter journal, too, as I cannot even find an ISSN for the "International Astrobiology Newsletter", let along it being mentioned in any Thomson Reuters database like the Science Citation Index. As far as I can see, the "International Astrobiology Newsletter" is a newsletter published by NASA, not a scientific journal, publishing meeting announcements and such. It does not seem to be notable at all. "Current Astrobiology Research" does not even seem to exist. What is this, an attempt at a hoax? --Randykitty (talk) 13:07, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As can be seen below, there are more examples of new articles that you have created that fail verification. It seems that you just copied the contents of Astrobiology (journal) and only changed the lead and the names/links in the infobox. You cannot just claim that a journal is included in a slew of indexing services without actually checking that. Creating such articles is highly inappropriate and you should stop this disruptive activity immediately. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 13:10, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Journal of Astrobiology

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Journal of Astrobiology requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.sciknow.org/journals/show/id/ja. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Randykitty (talk) 12:58, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Journal of Astrobiology & Outreach

The article Journal of Astrobiology & Outreach has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

New journal, only 2 issues published so far. CODEN listed in infobox belongs to a different journal. Journal is not indexed in any of the databases mentioned in the article. No independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 13:01, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of International Astrobiology Newsletter

The article International Astrobiology Newsletter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Newsletter without much apparent impact. CODEN listed in infobox belongs to a different journal (now removed). Journal is not indexed in any of the databases mentioned in the article. No independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 17:31, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Astrobiology (journal) into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:14, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see that Randykitty is way ahead of me here. However: please make sure you provide proper attribution for any material written or edited by anyone but yourself that you copy or re-use within Wikipedia. And, whether attributed or not, please don't blindly copy the description of one journal to describe another; to do so is coming close to dishonesty. Any content you add to Wikipedia should, as you must know, be supported by independent reliable sources. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:26, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Bond (Data) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bond (Data), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bond (Data) (January 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 21:01, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]