Jump to content

User talk:Laura eley

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi Laura eley! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Wikishovel (talk) 18:47, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Laura eley. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Laura eley. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Laura eley|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 08:37, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A WP-article about Sam Williams

[edit]

What are the 3-5 best sources (WP:RS) you can think of that are at the same time reliably published, independent of Sam Williams and about Sam Williams in some detail? This excludes blogs, wikis, social media, online bookstores, his websites, etc etc. If such sources exist, an article about him may be possible. If not, not. For example this [1] is reliably published and independent of him, but it doesn't say very much about Sam Williams. So it doesn't help the case for "can we have a WP-article about him?" (WP:N), but it can be used as a source for his age in 2011. Take the time to read and digest WP:An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:15, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declare your paid status, and I hope you are being paid enough to tackle the learning curve for successful editing and referencing, especially as you must submit via the Talk page, and then hope that a non-connected editor approves and implements your proposed changes. Use the {{edit COI}} template. Doing that 'flags' your edit request to attract attention to a bevy of volunteer editors who help with this task. Each proposed change may take weeks before acted on. David notMD (talk) 11:03, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Heading to deletion

[edit]

The deletion process takes 7-10 days. If the article can be improved, that is the window. The problem is lack of references about SW. Refs 3 and 5 are to his website, which does not count toward establishing notability, and ref 4 is useless - text and a ref about an unreleased album which states he was in the band, not the producer. David notMD (talk) 01:56, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adding to the above, the deletion discussion, where you are welcome to participate (you too, new user Hari Teah), is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Williams (record producer). Again, bring the best sources you can think of that are at the same time reliably published (WP:RS), independent of Sam Williams and about Sam Williams in some detail. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:25, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]