Jump to content

User talk:Lastknightonhorserunningtowardshiskingdom

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:
This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Draft:Techecies, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
CNMall41 (talk) 07:52, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Techecies! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 07:52, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Techecies, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! CNMall41 (talk) 07:53, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Techecies

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Techecies, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CNMall41 (talk) 07:54, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

[edit]
Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

  • Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Glen (talk) 08:13, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, Techecies. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. The page User:Techecies/sandbox has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

This article needs to be rewritten from scratch from reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not an outlet for promotion, advocacy, or advertising.

Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid can be located here and here, however be aware that this is not an exhaustive list. Pages can sometimes avoid these pitfalls and still be seen as an ad copy or unambiguously promotional, particularly if the editor appears to be a paid editor or has some other conflict of interest. Please review these policies, including the FAQ page on organizations to determine if this applies to you.

Common mistakes or beliefs about promotional editing center on the assumption that promotional editing only applies to promotion for commercial gain. Some tags or G11 nominations are met with confusion by creators, particularly if they spend much time reading or creating corporate documents, mission/vision statements, or similar copy for their organization. The frequent exposure to promotional tone may make it difficult to notice non-neutral phrases or styles, as the editor has grown accustomed to seeing it as everyday writing or speech. This can be difficult, but not impossible, to unlearn.

Another common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc. and CV/resumé's are by their nature promotional.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see this page on citing sources and Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability). This page has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{Reflist}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there. New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the TEAHOUSE and on IRC chat. Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Adventure is a useful tutorial.

New article creation can be difficult and frustrating. Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Wikipedia:Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:50, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:50, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #70675

[edit]

is closed. User will not be unblocked to use Wikipedia for advertising, promotion, or advocacy.

Please address the reasons for your block. They are promotional edits and a promotional username. Please follow the instructions in the block notice on your talk page. Please post the text 

{{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}}

at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. WIKIPEDIA is an encyclopedia. It is not a place for promoting anything or anyone or for any form of advocacy. You will not be unblocked to make promotional edits. Please describe what (non promotional) constructive edits you would make. BECAUSE Wikipedia's policy is that usernames should not be shared between more than one individual, the following types of usernames are not permitted because they imply shared use: USERNAMES that are simply names of companies or groups are not permitted (these also fall under Promotional names). Personal usernames that imply shared access, such as "Jack and Jill", are not permitted. Usernames that are names of posts within organizations, such as "Secretary of the XY Foundation", are not permitted, as such a post may be held by different persons at different times. HOWEVER, usernames are acceptable if they contain a company or group name but are clearly intended to denote an individual person, such as "Mark at WidgetsUSA", "Jack Smith at the XY Foundation", "WidgetFan87", etc. Please see the https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:49, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Lastknightonhorserunningtowardshiskingdom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Request reason:

understood the reason for blocking, will not repeat the mistake again ever. Now gonna learn how to use Wikipedia first

Accept reason:

Accepting on the basis of the below discussion, with the condition the Lastknight is not allowed to make edits requests for subjects with which they have a conflict of interest until they have at least 500 edits and 6 months have passed, at which time they may make a request to lift this topic ban at WP:AN. signed, Rosguill talk 03:46, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What edits do you intend to make? 331dot (talk) 10:05, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

General edits like filling information in existing articles related to news, politics and nature. Techecies (talk) 05:45, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Would you agree to refrain from editing about Techecies? 331dot (talk) 08:50, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
tell me if this is against Wikipedia policy then what about Wikipedia pages of Apple or Microsoft? I took reference of Apple page when it appears in 106.216.242.227 (talk) 11:38, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
An IP made the above comment. If this is you, remember to log in before posting. Regarding your question, articles are typically written by independent editors wholly unconnected with the subject in any way. If a representative of Microsoft wanted to contribute to the article about Microsoft, they would need to do so consistent with WP:COI and WP:PAID. You burned that bridge by diving right in and editing without being aware of relevant policies. I'm not asking you to permanently refrain from editing about Techecies, but we won't unblock you if your intention in the short term is to do so. We will need to see a good edit history, through editing about other topics, showing that you understand relevant Wikipedia content guidelines and sourcing requirements before permitting you to indirectly contribute about your company. 331dot (talk) 11:48, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
ok. I agree to not to make any edit in my company's account page. I'll learn first, see how Wikipedia guidelines work, edit some articles and then get back to the company page in future time. Techecies (talk) 13:50, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So usually in this situation we ask the editor to refrain from making edits related to their conflict of interest, say for six months or 500 edits(whichever is longer) and once that is reached they may request an evaulation of their edit history to see if they are ready to indirectly make conflict of interest related edits. Is this okay with you? 331dot (talk) 13:54, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
unblock me, that is the thing I want. ready for anything. Let me know the exact date from when I am eligible to start editing. Techecies (talk) 15:24, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lastknightonhorserunningtowardshiskingdom&oldid=1191705455"