User talk:Lambrook
August 2007
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, one or more of the external links you added to the page China do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Chris! my talk 00:18, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Re:Wojtek the soldier bear
[edit]Dear Richard Lucas, I'd love to help, and I am sure User:Halibutt, who wrote much of the original article on Wojtek, would also be interested. I think that combining an event dedicated to Polish history with educating people why open licenses are so important to that would be a great idea. I am also sure that Fundacja Wikimedia Polska will also be interested in helping and promoting that event.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 19:49, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
- I am still willing to help, through you would have first to remind me what your project is about. You may find many editors interested at Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland and Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history. PS. No, the fb page you linked is not me. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 15:59, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
hi sorry for a 6 year delay in responding. I've only just discovered how "Talk" pages work. Since then, a lot has happened with putting up statues in difference cities, and I cannot even remember what help I asked for. http://www.krakowpost.com/2014/04/statue-of-polands-soldier-bear-in-krakow/ not sure how to make contact with the other organisations you refer to in the above "talk" thanks anyway Lambrook (talk) 06:00, 15 August 2015 (UTC) Richard aka Lambrook
I have partially reverted your edits to this article. All edits to Wikipedia must comply with our policy on biographies of living persons, which says that controversial material about living people must not be included without attribution to a reliable source. In this case, I had to remove your description of his article as 'racist'; while I personally would agree that it was racist, Wikipedia can't say so itself. We don't, generally, refer to people or publications as racist directly, but include criticism of them from reliable sources (as Coren's article already does). I also removed the commentary about how he seems to have a double standard with regards to Jews and Poles - while that may be the case, it seemed to violate our policy against original research. Again, we can't say 'he thinks racism against Jews is wrong, but racism against Poles is OK' ourselves; but if a reliable source has said that, we can quote them. I hope this all makes sense; if you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thanks for reading, and happy editing. Robofish (talk) 19:47, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
September 2012
[edit]
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Chris Rogers (journalist). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 19:43, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 10
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chris Rogers (journalist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Condemned (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Query
[edit]In respect of uploading files, use this link: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard and follow its instructions. Before you upload files, please check the copyright status of the documents. I would guess that some of them should be free to use given that Mr Anderson's lifespan was mostly >100 years ago. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 17:00, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The Archers and Dumteedum
Thank you. I have moved your post from the top down to below the last section on the Talk page. It would be missed otherwise.
Always glad to assist you on Wikipedia.
Cheers!
Gareth Griffith-Jones (contribs) (talk) 12:33, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
17:27, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)