Jump to content

User talk:Lambik1982

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Lambik1982, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains(talk) 23:11, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lead Section Size

The lead section of a Wikipedia article is the section before the first heading. The table of contents, if displayed, generally appears between the lead section and the first subheading.

Rule of thumb: If a topic deserves a heading or subheading, then it deserves short mention in the lead.

The lead section should contain up to four paragraphs, depending on the length of the article, and should provide a preview of the main points the article will make, summarizing the primary reasons the subject matter is interesting or notable. The lead should be capable of standing alone as a concise overview of the article, should be written in a clear and accessible style, should be carefully sourced like the rest of the text, and should encourage the reader to want to read more. The following table has some general guidelines for the length of the lead section:

< 15,000 characters medium size > 30,000 characters
one or two paragraphs   two or three paragraphs   three or four paragraphs
To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}

An article you recently created, Medal of Merit of the Civil Guard, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 10:41, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 11:11, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Lambik1982! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 11:11, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EchidnaLives was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
echidnaLives - talk - edits 04:16, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Orders, decorations, and medals of Belgium, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page --. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Lambik1982. Thank you for your work on Medal of Belgian gratitude '40–'45. User:Boleyn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please address the referencing concerns.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Boleyn (talk) 15:03, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Lambik1982. Thank you for your work on Medal of Belgian gratitude '40–'45. User:Boleyn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please add clear, inline citations.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Boleyn (talk) 15:38, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Medals in biographies

[edit]

Hello, I have seen that you have recently added lists of medals to various Belgian military biographies. Medals certainly can be notable, but most are not. Listing off dozens of them is not what the average reader would expect and indiscriminate collections of information do not belong on Wikipedia (see WP:INDISCRIMINATE). Most also appear to be uncited. If you disagree, please discuss on a talk page. Thanks! —Brigade Piron (talk) 16:53, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, yes, I disagree. For military leaders, medals are part of their biography and often reflect what a person has done sturing his Carrera. They are also a token of gratitude and respect and therefore merkt to ben cited as such. Reference is often, ars&-moriendi.be which I've included in the references. I Will double check to make sure I did. Listing awards is not Common in Belgium as we are humble by nature, but more or less standard practice in other NATO countries. I saw that on several bio's the list of medals existed but was incorrect of incomplete. Therefore, I tried to complete it. Kind regards Lambik1982 (talk) 19:12, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for some autocorrect errors. Was on my mobile... Lambik1982 (talk) 19:13, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lambik, thanks for your comment. There are some individuals who are notable because of the medals they have won but frankly there are not many people in this situation and campaign medals will almost never be notable. This is as true for other NATO countries as Belgium. I also note that medals are not listed, for example, in the Nouvelle biographie nationale or similar biographical dictionaries. Also, please note that Ars Morendi is not a reliable source for the purposes of Wikipedia - please see the guidance on this at WP:RS/SPS. —Brigade Piron (talk) 20:51, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Lambik1982. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Medal of Merit of the Civil Guard, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:04, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lambik1982. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Medal of Merit of the Civil Guard".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 08:21, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]