User talk:Lafayette Baguette

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Congratulations on creating and getting the image permissions for MarbleLympics! Keep up the good work! Breawycker (talk to me!) 01:41, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Thank you very much! Lafayette Baguette ^talk 14:10, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of MarbleLympics

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article MarbleLympics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nova Crystallis -- Nova Crystallis (talk) 22:02, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

-- ferret (talk) 14:29, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Tower of Babel

Hi Lafayette Baguette,

You just declined two edits I made to Tower of Babel. I guess a new user removing swathes of text and sources appears to be vandalism? :)

https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Tower_of_Babel&diff=893080863&oldid=892598573

My first edit removed an inaccurate statement re: the dates of the Etemenanki (an article I've been trying to bend into shape)

https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Tower_of_Babel&diff=893081207&oldid=893080863

The second removed a couple of sentences that were overkill for the introduction. The intro should summarize the Tower of Babel not Etemenanki. The material is covered later in the Babel article and at the Etemenanki article, nothing was actually lost.

Please would you consider "undoing" your "undo"? Mango Mapes (talk) 21:47, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi there, Mango Mapes. If the first edit I declined was an inaccurate statement, I do apologize for that. I will revert my revert. The second however, appeared to be removal of a lot of content. The content appeared (while quite specific) reliable and useful. Best regards, Lafayette Baguette ^talk 21:51, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Looking at the second edit, I accidentally removed the sentence "A Sumerian story with some similar elements is told in Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta". Sorry about that. The height could be merged into the previous sentence perhaps, something like: "notably the Etemenanki, a 91 meter-high ziggurat dedicated to the Mesopotamian god Marduk.." This figure for the height is somewhat speculative though! The reference the destruction by Alexander just seems too much for the introduction, it took place after the Babel story was recorded. I will try again! Mango Mapes (talk) 22:00, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

nevermind, I see you changed it back! Thanks. Mango Mapes (talk) 22:01, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Reinstating challenged unsourced information?

Hi, regarding Special:Diff/893075738, please keep WP:PROVEIT and WP:BLP in mind. I have now accepted the change. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 04:58, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fire from the Rock (April 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kvng was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fire from the Rock and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Fire from the Rock, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Kvng (talk) 15:19, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

About me boxes

Hey, @Lafayette Baguette! Thanks for creating MarbleLympics! I saw the boxes on your page under About Me. How did you get them? Thanks, The 2nd Red Guy (talk) 01:23, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Hey, The 2nd Red Guy, I'm glad you like MarbleLympics! See WP:UBX for information about userboxes. Lafayette Baguette ^talk 14:18, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of MarbleLympics

The article MarbleLympics you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:MarbleLympics for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nova Crystallis -- Nova Crystallis (talk) 03:02, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Changes to Daniel Craig page.

Hi,

I would just like to enquire exactly why so many people are obsessed with pursuing this belief that Daniel Craig is an atheist when he has NEVER once made any such claim, and your only supporting quote is allegedly from a German magazine.

I’ve been a journalist for 15 years and I’m sorry to say that people in the media lie all the time. We make up quotes to support the articles we are writing. Think about it logically. An actor is interviewed about a role where is he playing an atheist journalist. Do you honestly think the publication is going to report that he is anything other than an atheist in real life as well? A millionaire atheist actor who attends a United Nations assembly specifically to hear the leader of the Catholic Church giving a talk, and taking photographs of the said leader of the Catholic Church. Not very plausible is it? The sources I provided were actual physical pictures of him alongside other well known public figures who are Catholics. You could see he was there. And then, years later, when commenting on the passing of a beloved fellow actor, he says that he hopes that “Wherever he (Albert Finney) is now, I hope there are horses and good company”. If he’s an atheist this comment would make no sense, since atheists believe that death is final. Then to top if off, his reaction when presenter Alex Zane asked him if there was anyone who could make him return to the role of 007 after Bond 25, Craig’s answer was simple: “God.” Just as he said his success as 007 before Casino Royale was “in the lap of the gods”. Atheists don’t believe in God.

I’m not for a minute suggesting that Craig is a religious person. He’s said he’s never been a church goer, but neither am I but I still regard myself a Catholic. But your straw man argument is incredibly weak when you’re relying on something which MAY have been said in a foreign interview. You have no way of proving that was what Craig said, or if the interview even took place. Whereas I’ve provided photographic proof of Craig attending the Pope’s speech: you can see him standing alongside Bill and Melinda Gates. He was there in person. Why would he be there if he doesn’t believe in what the speaker represents? And the BBC is a far more credible source regarding quotes actors make than any claims made by a foreign publication about an interview which may not have even taken place. And yet you believe that this is cast iron proof that this actor is an atheist. I could say that Liam Nesson is my father’s second cousin, but unless I can provide evidence it means nothing. The same applies when you make sweeping statements about celebrities but have nothing to back it up. Surely common sense would tell you that your argument is weak to say the very least. I look forward to your response. Corkagetom (talk) 15:25, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

I'm not responsible for the first edit. What I did was revert your pending revision because Daniel Craig has not stated that he is an atheist, but he has stated that he isn't religious. Perhaps you could change the wording? Lafayette Baguette ^talk 15:27, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Hello again, Corkagetom. I'm not going to go into specifics about my opinion on the situation, but I just wanted to say that if you were indeed citing from BBC News with the quote you provided, you needed to cite that more than anything else. ESPECIALLY for quotes. See WP:VERIFY (and WP:SOURCE within it). Lafayette Baguette ^talk 02:02, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Your grasp of journalism is quite worrying if you are debating whether the BBC is a credible source yet you’re willing to accept an alleged quote from a German publication which isn’t even in Craig’s native language. There are photographs of him all over the internet meeting the Pope alongside Bill and Melinda Gates, not to mention visiting the Sistine Chapel and various UK churches. I thought Wikipedia was run by adults relying on verifiable fact, not speculative quotes.I guess I was wrong. Corkagetom (talk) 12:00, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Auston Matthews

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Auston Matthews you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 14:21, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Auston Matthews

The article Auston Matthews you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Auston Matthews for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 16:01, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Blank Media Games

The article Blank Media Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only known for one event; fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 16:21, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Auston Matthews

The article Auston Matthews you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Auston Matthews for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 11:41, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Fire from the Rock concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Fire from the Rock, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:19, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:"Jelle's Marble Runs" YouTube logo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:"Jelle's Marble Runs" YouTube logo.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Wcam (talk) 19:52, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of BitLife for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BitLife is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BitLife until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Bait30  ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 03:56, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

November 2020

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --DannyS712 (talk) 00:05, 20 November 2020 (UTC)