User talk:Laborec

Welcome!

Hello, Laborec, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! †Bloodpack† 15:13, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Koncert2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Koncert2.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:09, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Fotocd-1-.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Fotocd-1-.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:37, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Vitoo.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Vitoo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:38, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bienale.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bienale.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:38, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Koncert2.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Koncert2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:39, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Casette.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Casette.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:39, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Laborec. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Laborec~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

01:04, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

September 2018

Hello, I'm North Shoreman. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to American Family Association have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 22:19, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 12:28, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Laborec (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been working on Wikipedia for years, done hundreds of Editings, donaťed to Wikipedia, and now somebody comes to block me without any explanation. Great work, guys... Laborec (talk) 07:36, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were blocked for these three edits, 1, 2, 3, which gave the impression that you are not here to build this encyclopedia. You have done 42 edits since 2007, not "hundreds"(under this account, at least), and have roughly the same number of deleted edits. Donations to the Wikimedia Foundation have no bearing on your edits. To be unblocked, you will need to acknowledge what you did to get blocked, how you won't do it again, and explain what constructive edits you want to make. I am declining this request. 331dot (talk) 08:30, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Laborec (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

For 1 and 3 I apologise, was made falsely from my side. I plan to further build also English Wikipedia, especially in areas, where Wiki is not so much developed. Laborec (talk) 18:14, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It seems likely to me that you only want to be unblocked so you can continue your POV-pushing and vandalism. You seem to think that if you donate some money, it gives you the right to vandalize the encyclopedia. No, it does not. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:02, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Laborec (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Come on guys, be rational, not emotional. I have apologized, haven´t I ? Thanks. Laborec (talk) 20:47, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Of the three edits brought up by 331dot, you've apologised for two of them. But even if you had apologised for all three, that's not the goal here. The goal is for you to convince us you won't make such edits again. So far, your unblock requests haven't even attempted to do that and have been somewhat disingenuous, such as claiming hundreds of edits over years when in fact, you've made 42 (surviving) edits. There's certainly a path forward here, but claiming your attempts to harm Wikipedia are no big deal are doing you no favours. Yamla (talk) 21:27, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Laborec (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

OK, I give up and do not want to participate at this circus any more. You guys are so funny - seems like not psychologically grown up kids with their minds prevail over Wikipedia. In this way you can not name Wikipedia an objective source of anything. Keep doing that... You hypocritic kids.. 62.152.229.221 (talk) 06:40, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please log in to your account if you wish to make an unblock request. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:25, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Laborec (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did it now Yunshui Laborec (talk) 07:54, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No reason for unblock given. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:18, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Laborec (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Nobody asked you.. Laborec (talk) 08:56, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:19, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.