User talk:LTH ASG
January 2018
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at List of Xbox One X Enhanced games. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. -- ferret (talk) 15:24, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
- See discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games#Metacritic Scores in Lists. -- ferret (talk) 15:26, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
If you re-add the information again without consensus, you're going to receive a short block from editing. Sergecross73 msg me 16:57, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
A dispute resolution has been set up for the matter for MC scores.
- This is not an appropriate time to go to Dispute Resolution. Please, just slow down and take some time to learn how Wikipedia works. Do some research, and you'll see just how many mistakes you're making, and why no one is agreeing with you. Sergecross73 msg me 19:46, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
DRN case closed
[edit]
This message template was placed here by Nihlus, a volunteer at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. You recently filed a request or were a major party in the DRN case titled "List of_Xbox_One_X_Enhanced_games". The case is now closed: consensus has been established on the WikiProject page. If you are unsatisfied with this outcome, you may open a thread on another noticeboard as appropriate. If you have any questions please feel free to contact this volunteer at his/ her talk page or at the DRN talk page. Thank you! --Nihlus 19:57, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
- Additional comments by volunteer: Please discuss with the WikiProject since the consensus is clear that the MC scores should not be included.
- Since your edits were against the current consensus, a Request for Comments, which obtains a larger consensus and is binding, is a better method of dispute resolution than a request for moderated discussion, which probably will not change any minds. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:15, 5 January 2018 (UTC)