User talk:Kurtigiboy15

Welcome!

Hello, Kurtigiboy15, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to DWFR. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 14:13, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Kurtigiboy15, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 14:14, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of DWFR

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on DWFR requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Randykitty (talk) 14:41, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Kurtigiboy15. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article DWFR, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 15:05, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for creating hoaxes, as you did at DWFR. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 15:02, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kurtigiboy15 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The page DWFR is true and not hoax and it is a new radio station here in our area that is opening soon and not yet broadcasting beacuse the radio station is still in construction and almost finish so that the people will see the information about the new radio station in our area and this information is important when they search it in the wikipedia and also unblock me because I don't violate anything like hoax and this page is true, Thank you Regards

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. I can find no indication that this station is real, and you have provided no evidence. When we had to delete the page twice that should have told you there was an issue. Recreating it again and again is disruptive, and it's obvious you'd go on if unblocked. Huon (talk) 16:27, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kurtigiboy15 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Again as I've said the radio station DWFR is new in our area so we are planning yet to create a FB page so I don't have any evidence yet to see you but soon there will be don't be too in a hurry we are just getting started but truly this radio station is true and will open soon so don't worry if you don't see yet any page about this radio station but soon will so I don't have any evidence yet.

Decline reason:

Then you should not have created the article, and certainly not again after it was first deleted. Please read WP:RS which explains the kind of sources you will need (and please note that Facebook will not suffice). Until you understand and accept that you must not write about things for which there is no evidence yet, an unblock request is not going to be accepted. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:15, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kurtigiboy15 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Unblock me and bring back my page DWFR this is the evidence of live streaming http://www.ustream.tv/channel/lodge-radio I make it long time ago and this live streaming is not new so I am not creating hoaxes.

Decline reason:

Until there is good evidence published in independent sources this article will not be allowed, and until you accept this you will not be unblocked.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 10:30, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kurtigiboy15 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

ok I'm creating hoaxes I admit it and I'm sorry for disappointing you I will promise not to do a page that is not existing like hoaxes I promise just unblock me and stop creating non existing page in wikipedia.Kurtigiboy15 (talk) 14:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information.

Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:17, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kurtigiboy15 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hello good evening, it's been a year since my account is block, please unblock me now I have a evidence that my pagw DWFR is legal and not a hoax, here is the facebook page of said page I've created https://www.facebook.com/dwfr1043, hopefully I'll be unblock soon, Many tahnks and hope to receive a reply soon.

Decline reason:

Since you have stated that this alleged radio station is a hoax and is not a hoax, it is difficult to trust anything that you state(I suggest you read The Boy Who Cried Wolf). You have also been told that Facebook is not acceptable as a source as anyone can create a Facebook page for anything, real or not. Since you either are willfully ignoring what you are being told, or do not understand, unblocking you would not benefit Wikipedia and it is clear that further appeals would be a waste of time, so I have decided to remove your talk page access. That will leave you with WP:UTRS to request unblock, but if you abuse that avenue of appeal you will lose access to that too. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 14:08, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Kurtigiboy15 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #25515 was submitted on Jun 07, 2019 13:56:21. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 13:56, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]