User talk:Kukini/Archive19

need a little advice

Hi Kukini,

I've been working on the article the Pennsylvania Railroad. This was a delisted good article. I renominated it after helping to copy edit it. If you have a second to look at it, I'd like your advice. Thanks Shinerunner 01:25, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice, I went back a cleaned up the links as you suggested. Shinerunner 15:46, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

images in sandbox

i would like to know if it is possible to save images or pictures as well in my sandbox.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Varun vaidya (talk • contribs)

Image:OVPL2Tree.JPG

Thanks for uploading this awesome picture.--PEAR (talk) 18:59, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

User:Endangered11

I have been trying to add a environmental organization to the following page http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Environmental_organization and then create a page on the organization that exaplains its history, mission....etc. All my info got deleted! I do not understand why since there are not copyright issues and the organization fits exactly the requirements... Please could help me to add it? Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Endangered11 (talk • contribs)

User:204.17.31.126

This IP, registered to the University of Phoenix, has just been used once again to vandalize the University of Phoenix article in a pro-UofP manner. I just reverted, and slapped a warning on 'em. --Orange Mike 14:36, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Schools Portal

Hi you left a message at the Schools Portal... are you still interested? Victuallers 16:17, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Hey thanks for that message, it's really nice of you and i'd have never epected to hear from anyone else on Wikipedia, even if i am a bit new. I'm not sure if you'll even get this message because i'm not used to this type of chat, you understand me? Cool, well thanks again! Very useful page, thank you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Beautiful so ur (talk • contribs)

User:ChibiMrBubbles

Hello,

I am having problems with a user who is reverting my comments on his user talk page. I am trying to leave feedback on his editing work on other articles, and he labels me a vandal and a troll while reverting my edits to his talk page. He is being quite uncivil and I wanted to know what I should do now, or if you could help me. Thanks for your time. Coreycubed 22:00, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

User talk:SuppaIke

I'm not sure what happened but your edit at User talk:SuppaIke rewrote my warning, and then you gave him a second warning. Why the rewrite and why 2 warnings? He's only made one edit. -WarthogDemon 01:54, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Nevermind, found his edit. Sorry for the confusion and I warned him on that just now. I'm still a bit confused as to why you reworded my warning however. -WarthogDemon 01:59, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Ah, I see now. :) And thanks for stepping in with User:Overrural. I was able to keep up with his vandalism, but I dunno how long I would've been able to keep it up. :P Crazy... -WarthogDemon 03:09, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Added After Save: See What I Mean?

Would it be the sincerest form of flattery if I mimicked/borrowed/stole the gist of the formatting/links/layout of your userpage? I'm not talking content so much as functionality -- I could use the links you've so neatly placed before yourself on your page, and the personal sandbox area is great (maybe it'll cut down on my repetitve...repetitive...repeated edits of the same article?) - Ageekgal 09:48, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the visit to my talk page. Had to return the honor. :) - Ageekgal 03:54, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your greeting

Hello, nice to see you I am not very new to Wikipedia (about a year anonymously, few months as INULL) but thanks for your welcome. I will be sure to ask you if I need anything. I'd like to know how you came about finding my name though. I'm also wondering about something.. I seem to remember articles not supposing to be a how-to guide but I've come across a few how-to articles and wondered how I should tag them or if I even should.

Thanks ^_^ INULL 06:54, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I'm awarding you this RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for your great contributions to protecting and reverting attacks of vandalism on Wikipedia. Wikidudeman (talk) 16:30, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

User:Sickbrah

Please could you take care of this user. The account was only made for vandalism. Thanks. --Thw1309 06:22, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

I took care of this problem. -- Gogo Dodo 06:24, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

User:Galgameth

Please could you look at this editor. Ten edits, ten clear cases of vandalism.--Thw1309 07:39, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter

Delivered on 16:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC).

recent blocking of a school

I saw that yesterday (the 4th) you blocked an IP used by a school (User_talk:199.72.115.66) but today (the 5th) they made an edit on the OS page, which I reverted. Maybe I'm confused about timezones :-) Muchas gracias, Pete St.John 16:26, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

thanks for quick response at my talk. To me 3 hours is nothing, but Wiki is a very liberal, generous place. Thanks for extending the block. Maybe order of magnitude each time, 3 hours, one day, one month, etc. Anyway thanks. Hasta pronto (por supuesto!) Pete St.John 17:05, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Please Block

please block user 165.139.73.59 again he has recived numerous warnigs from many users and he has recently vandlised the same page twice in 3 mins thank you 18:10, 5 September 2007 (UTC)—Preceding unsigned comment added by Foxtrotman (talk • contribs)

Me, Again

How do you create your archives--manually or via some tool? I'm enjoying my now-USABLE userpage thanks to patterning it after yours, btw. - Ageekgal 19:40, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Cheers

Thanks for devandalizing Dimitris Spanoulis page! Could you please tell me the template i should use when i want to warn somebody for vandalizing articles? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sergiogr (talk • contribs) 19:10, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

• Thanks for providing me with those templates! They are most useful! Sergiogr 19:20, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

User:Flaatereichen

It was another accident sorry. --Flaatereichen 05:58, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

sorry, It was another accident, I didnt do it on purpose. --Flaatereichen 06:02, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

and can you not swear at me like you did last time? plain rude.. --Flaatereichen 06:09, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

answer me you fuck. --Flaatereichen 06:13, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

just get out of my face ok? get out of my face. --Flaatereichen 06:20, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Snaps

I'm not posting inaccurate information about the game of snaps. I'm simply removing information that is over-revealing as I indicated in my description. The purpose of playing snaps is for new "players" to analytically figure out how the game is played. The reward is this itself, not playing it. A simple analogy would be pitting an expert tic-tac-toe player against a novice. If you explain to the novice that this a game that can never be won when 2 skilled players compete, it renders the game meaningless and thus there is no point in playing the game at all. The fun is derived from the novice learning that tic-tac-toe is an unwinable game. This is the reason I wish to remove those paragraphs from the description of Snaps. If you cannot do so, please explain to me why this is inappropriate.

Thank you, Dan Scholten —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sealpointman (talk • contribs) 06:39, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Is there a way to get a consensus of people to have this information removed? Who would have to "vote" on this? Thanks,

Dan —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sealpointman (talk • contribs) 06:46, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

After reviewing the intro, I posted my concerns on a newly created talk page for the Snaps game. Is this all I can do to express my opinion on my proposed changes to the page?

Thanks, Dan Sealpointman 06:58, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. It was not my intention to vandalize the page, but to fix it as I saw fit. I'm a long time consumer but a first time contributer. I will review the link you sent me and take appropriate action. Thank you for your patience.

Sincerely, Dan Scholten —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sealpointman (talk • contribs) 07:03, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Snaps (game) (3rd AFD Nomination)

Hello!

I am contacting all registered wikipedia editors and admins that have contributed to the Snaps (game) article to let them know the page is now being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy.

If you wish, please share your thoughts at this article's entry on the Articles for deletion page. I look forward to any comments or thoughts you have on this manner! --Brian_{(view my history)}/^{(How am I doing?)} 06:57, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Please delete the pictures that I have been editing.

I wanted to remove those tags from the pictures that I have uploaded and edited on Wikipedia because I've uploaded them on the Commons. They don't need to be on Wikipedia anymore. I think they meet all of the criteria for deletion. If they don't let me know. Wikiman86 15:55, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Cheers mate!

Hiya dude, thanks so much for putting an edit count on my talk. It's gonna be really helpful isn't it?Sergiogr 18:36, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the Suggestion

Thanks for the suggestion of using Christian_terrorism as a topic in my class. I actually was looking for something that is less obviously controversial to "normal" people, so I went the heated argument about the size of the 2nd Death Star that I found on the Lamest Edit War Page. I'll still use your idea, though. I'll mention Christian Terrorism as we get into "real" arguments and how Wikipedia adresses them. Thanks for your help! GumbyProf: "I'm about ideas, but I'm not always about good ideas." 19:49, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

"Reasonably cited"

What makes the "Islam adversary" section reasonably cited? The next citation is a newspiece about their grief for the London bombing and seeking amicable terms with Hindus/Sikhs. the language is hardly inflammatory or indicitive of an enemy.. btw, no offense, but as an american why are you editing a british politics page?86.156.88.25 22:00, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

For your assistance reverting vandalism at Rosewood massacre! --Moni3 16:52, 17 September 2007 (UTC)Moni3

LOL omg thank you

Oh good grief, My fingers need to wake up lol. I meant to warn the user for this and ended up hitting the CSD button instead! Thank you so much for removing it so quickly. ~*Ariel slinks off with her face quite red*~ ^Ariel♥Gold 13:47, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

P.S. And I evidently wasn't quite fully awake since I was on the userpage instead of the talk page, double doh! lol. Sheesh. Thanks again! ^Ariel♥Gold 13:49, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Hee hee, thanks, that's a pretty silly mistake to make, but I can always blame it on my dying trackball, that seems to have a life of its own and jumps the cursor all over, lol. ^Ariel♥Gold 15:33, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

mr kukini i never edited here so why hve u all psted mssge to me abot vandelism?????????--59.94.143.134 09:40, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Edit summary field

Is it possible to go back and change the edit summary field? Inoesomestuff 21:06, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Small Question.

I recently got on Wikipedia from my School's computer. I found a link at the top of the page about Vandalism that I was doing to Wikipedia, and that I would be blocked from it. At our school, we each have individual ID numbers for the computers, and I find it un-likly someone could have stolen mine. I was curious to find out if it could possibly just be from the school's IP address.

I apologize for any inconvience, -Kai. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.220.86.34 (talk) 12:59, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

User:Tme2nsb

He's perfectly within his rights to remove warnings if he wants to. Corvus cornix 21:00, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

He had been changing other people's comments, but he had stopped once I told him he could just delete them. Corvus cornix 21:03, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, you, too.  :) Corvus cornix 21:07, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

That is really weird that that happened. Do you know how to get a block off of your computer if it was someone else who was doing the naughty stuff because it seems really unfair that just because one person screws up every one has to pay for it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wrongpageamundson (talk • contribs) 16:04, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Dispute Resolution

Hello Kukini! I need your assistence or another neutral administrator, concerning a editor who seems to not want to take the time to look over the sources I cite, but to argue with me and only bring up his sources as the only valid ones. Please look over the convo so far, you can come to your own conclusion, as my aim is not to sway you, but I really need someone to mediate between me and a few other editors who seem to be following me, and I guess you could say "ganging" up on me. Here is the article talk page [1].

If you have any further questions please ask, thank you in advance!--Moosh88 21:28, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Is there a reason why you have not responded to me, Kukini?--Moosh88 01:55, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Ok, well who should I go to, I am not sure where to go and could use some help.--Moosh88 02:01, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, dab is biased and reverting academic sources, he is abusing his admin. powers. If you can not help, please link me with someone who has time for a dispute resolution.--Moosh88 20:12, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Tallahassee

Hello Kukini. I note that you just removed "Barley Thar" from the Tallahassee Notable Groups section, where I had added it, stating "redlinked "notable"". Please, I don't know what that means. Are you saying that the group should not be on the list because they have no individual Wikpedia listing? If so, that logic should lead to many changes of all sorts, I would think, and perhaps to many meaningless Wikipedia entries. Please let me know if there is a policy of some sort on this. Martha F. Watson —Preceding unsigned comment added by Martha F. Watson (talk • contribs) 14:09, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar!

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I award you this RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for all your Vandal fighting! Tiddly-Tom 13:53, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Flirting

Why is it that everyone flirts but no one does anything about the people they want to date>prom/kissingqueen 16:03, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Backlog...

Wanna take a quick break from vandal-fighting, and do some vandal-blocking? There's a huge backlog at WP:AIV. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gscshoyru (talk • contribs) 16:43, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Fart

I've only undone the change once, so I'll pop back there now. (Can you tidy up my 3rr report which I was filing at the same time you were blocking?) Thanks for your actions on this one. Bencherlite^Talk 20:14, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I'm awarding you this RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for your great contributions to protecting and reverting attacks of vandalism on Wikipedia. Wikidudeman (talk) 13:48, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Newbie 86.92.134.171 (Brian K West) gone wild

I just reviewed the Talk:FreeSWITCH reverted edits by this new user and wanted to provide you some background. This user started with a user id of User:briankwest, who is the website administrator for the open source project FreeSWITCH (Brian K West). He subsequently only uses an ip address and as you have noted, does not sign his comments. He has a definite conflict of interest in his edits and has been outright hostile to any suggestions to change this article about his project, suggesting that criticism mean bias. He, on the other hand, does not acknowledge his association with the project. (Review the original talk that he removed as well as comments left on my talk page User talk:Calltech#FreeSWITCH advert tagging.) I stopped posting on this talk page after his abusive comments and feel he needs some form of administrative warning. I have posted spam warnings on this article in the past, which he simply removes. The article should also be tagged with a COI warning, because this individual is the major contributor to its content. Thanks! Calltech 16:05, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

I have subsequently posted an entry at WT:WPSPAM#Newbie briankwest (aka 86.92.134.171) gone wild with the same content as here. Several users have responded and now tagged the article as spam or recommended reducing it to a stub until reliable third parties are found to expand the article. Calltech 17:58, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Illinois 2007 Census

The WikiProject Illinois 2007 membership census has concluded. If you did not add your name during the last week, you were declared "inactive" in the project, your name is still listed at The Participants Page. You can change your status by replacing {{member inactive}} with {{active}} in the table. Any members should also feel free to fill in any missing details on the list below.

IvoShandor 11:14, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Oklahoma Newsletter October 07

The WikiOkie Reporter WikiProject Oklahoma's Newsletter Issue 2 - October 2007 Edit this newsletter Discuss this newsletter	Your second or third stop for WikiProject Oklahoma News Sign up to receive this newsletter Oklahoma Portal Current article statistics Past issues of this newsletter
Modest boost in assessed articles during September WikiProject Oklahoma's massive list of unassessed articles got smaller over the month of September, as 45 articles were assessed by bots and editors. Assessments made on August 31 bring the total to 62 assessed articles over the 31-day period. On September 15, BetacommandBot assessed 40 articles from no-class to stub and start class. This bot automatically updates the talk pages of articles included in more than one WikiProject if at least one WikiProject has already assessed the material, bringing each interested WikiProject's ratings into compliance with the assessment. No B-class or higher quality assessments were given out over September, and only a small handful of importance assessments were granted. On August 31, one Low, Mid, and High importance rating was given to three separate articles. Leroy McGuirk was given the lone high-importance rating. Oklahoma categories receive help from Texan TexasAndroid, an administrator, assisted WikiProject Oklahoma by categorizing nearly 100 Oklahoma-related pages on September 24. The additions were made mainly to Tulsa-related pages. "I've done the major cities in Texas in the past, and was thinking about what to do next, and decided to stay relatively close to home for now. Thus OK's big cities got done," TexasAndroid wrote on his user page. Meet WikiProject Oklahoma's "sub-project" Taskforce Tulsa, a collaboration of editors operating under WikiProject Oklahoma, has been created to increase the scope of Wikipedia's coverage of Tulsa and its surrounding areas. Taskforce Tulsa is many things, but most importantly, it is a way for editors to have a place to put Tulsa-related requests (pictures, article, expansion, collaboration) for other editors interested in Tulsa. News, guidelines, and category trees related to Tulsa articles can easily be accessed and added through the task force's project page. The taskforce is not its own WikiProject. Instead, it works in conjunction with WikiProject Oklahoma to increase the quality and scope of Tulsa-related material. Because of the increased clutter and unnecessary waste of space that would be created with a new WikiProject, editors have opted for a taskforce, or workgroup project. Rather than having a Wikiproject Oklahoma banner as well as a Wikiproject Tulsa banner on most Tulsa-related pages, editors can simply add the Tulsa Taskforce note onto the existing Wikiproject Oklahoma banner. Cleaner, clearer, and more efficient. In edit mode, such a banner would appear as this: "{{WikiProject Oklahoma|class=FA|importance=Top|tulsa-task-force=yes}}". In other words, simply adding "tulsa-task-force=yes}}" to the existing Wikiproject Oklahoma banner on an article's talk page would include that article into the Tulsa Task Force. According to an explanation on the taskforce's project page, "The Tulsa Task Force is a 'sub-wikiproject' operating 'beneath' Wikiproject Oklahoma, and is designed to assist it by focusing specifically on Tulsa-related material. Editors who are interested in expanding knowledge of Tulsa on Wikipedia may wish to consider themselves part of Taskforce Tulsa as well as Wikiproject Oklahoma." Interested parties can sign up much like a stand-alone WikiProject.
This month's task: Get out of your routine. Make some edits! • Edit next month's newsletter
The WikiProject Oklahoma newsletter is a work in progress so please share your ideas about how the newsletter can be improved. If you no longer wish to receive this newsletter, please remove your name from the sign-up list.

This newsletter was delivered to you by Okiefromokla. This is a one-time delivery as to all Wikiproject Oklahoma members to boost interest in the newsletter. In the future, if you would like to receive this newsletter in your talk page, please insert your name in the sign-up list. Thanks!

School IP Addresses

Kukini, a quick question for you, seeing as we spoke briefly about school IP blocks before - our school has a dynamic IP that changes every few months, and I've found a couple of user talk pages all linked to our school with notes on vandalism (back to 2006). I intend to remove the notice that the IP is attached to our school (since it no longer is) when I get confirmation from school administration - but what should happen to our list of vandalism warnings, seeing as the IP is no longer used by us? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexlmuller (talk • contribs) 16:42, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

I want my page back

Why the hell did ya delete my page? I was working on it for a day and you lazy just delete it. Couldn't you at least tell me what I need to do not to have my page deleted? I'd like my page back please. Laisinteresting 13:52, ET —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.115.186.161 (talk) 17:52, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

The WikiProject Universities Newsletter: Issue I (September 2007)

The September 2007 issue of the WikiProject Universities newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you for your continued support of WikiProject Universities! -- Noetic Sage 19:38, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

AA's RFA

Thank you for your your comments and interest in my RFA! Sorry for the late reply - my net connection decided to go AWOL at the crucial time! → AA ^(talk) — 13:08, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Illinois Post Census Report

The WikiProject Illinois Newsletter (Beta) "Post Census Report" Vol. I, No. 1, Issue 1, October 2007 If you would like to delete this message, the original is at Wikipedia:WikiProject Illinois/Newsletter/Post Census Report

Census results On October 4, 2007 WikiProject Illinois embarked on a membership census. The census was the project's first since its establishment on September 24, 2005. Due to the nature of the wiki, and the two years that had passed, it seemed likely that many of the project's older members were no longer active. The project page had grown stagnant and the census provided an opportunity to see who was still around, slaving away in their own corner of the encylopedia, unknown to the rest of the Illinois editing world. Well, now, the tabulation is complete, and after a notice at the Community Portal, we have gained a couple new members amongst the cluster of project veterans who returned to sign up. Of the 55 members listed on the project membership list on October 4, 26 editors returned to the list to "resign up," thus, confirming their current activity within project areas. If you received this message, you were one of those editors. The List of Participants has now been updated to reflect the results of this membership survey, with members who failed to respond highlighted as "inactive." Now, as a group of editors, we have a core list of individuals, that will hopefully grow in size as the project strives to become a better organized central collaboration space for editors working on Illinois related topics. What's next? The big question, where does the project go from here? Well there are a few proposals being floated at this project page. Little discussion has occurred thus far, and participation would be key to all of them. Some ideas include: An A-class review system, under the WP:ILLINOIS banner, to serve the Illinois and Chicago WikiProjects. A project newsletter, of which this is a beta version. Project restructuring, to include regional and specific discipline task forces. A monthly project collaboration to grow out of our currently idle collaboration division.

From the Editors Welcome new members: Laleena, Omnedon and Rickvaughn Interested in helping building and developing a project newsletter? See, start and join in on the proposal discussion. The table is back up at the List of Participants and it has several blanks you can fill in if you have not done so already. They are: where you are originally from, where you live, the project areas you work in, your join date, and now, your status (which has been filled in for you). News & Notes Don't forget to add the project page to your watchlist so you can monitor the project talk page for relevant discussion. As a note: WP:ILLINOIS is the project page shortcut and WT:ILLINOIS is the project talk page shortcut. Kranar drogin essentially single-handedly cleared out the massive backlog in Category:Unassessed WikiProject Illinois articles, feel free to sprinkle his page with barnstars and thank yous, he deserves it. Everyone can help keep it cleared out by checking it for unassessed articles. For more information see the Assessment division of the project, though it isn't as project specific as it should be, it has enough info to give assessors an idea of what to do. Be aware that classes A, GA and FA can only be imposed by outside review processes. The AlexNewArtBot dumps new Illinois related articles on this page periodically. You can help monitor new material by watchlisting the page, and combing new Illinois articles for clean up, referencing and other needed editing work. Contributors to this Issue IvoShandor

IvoShandor 06:12, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

RFA Thanks

Click there to open your card! → → →

My dear Wikipedian Kukini,
Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed successfully with 36 supports, 3 opposed, and 1 neutral. No matter if you !voted support, oppose, neutral, or even if you just stopped by to make a comment, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. Since I am a new admin, if you have any suggestions or concerns, feel free to inform me of them. Thank you and good day.

The Placebo Effect

Credits

This RFA thanks was inspired by The Random Editor, who in turn was inspired by Phaedriel's RFA thanks. So unfortunately this is not entirely my own design.

This end the usual RFA thanks spam. You may return to your regular editing now.

Previously blocked anon page is at vandalism again

People at this school anon IP continue to vandalize wikipedia. You had previously done the most recent block so I thought it was appropriate to bring it directly to you.

User_talk:72.10.102.238

http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Head&diff=prev&oldid=163833004 http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Butt&diff=prev&oldid=163831915 http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Society_of_Women_Engineers&diff=prev&oldid=163796811

Etc. etc. All of this after your block wore off. Larry Dunn 21:12, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter

Delivered on 17:31, 11 October 2007 (UTC).

RfA thanks

		With thanks!
		Thanks for participating in my RfA, which closed successfuly. I leave you with a picture of the real Blood Red Sandman! Note his 'mop' is slightly deadlier than mine! - - Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 18:46, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

I joined. futurebird 16:17, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Need a little advice

I am new to Wikipedia and have just posted my first article. I am trying to meet all the guidelines and requirements that Wikipedia has. I see that you are quite knowledgeable on using Wikipedia and contributed a lot to many different articles. I would appreciate if you could take a look at my article and provide me with any tips or changes that I need in my article - 10.5" Corporate 14 Bolt Differential.

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wickmaro (talk • contribs) 15:28, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

userinfo and thanks

Thanks for the gift - that's really handy. And thanks for stepping in on the List of Bollywood Movies inspired from English Movies discussion on the editor's talk page. You said it better than me. Cheers! Toddstreat1 15:59, 17 October 2007 (UTC)