Jump to content

User talk:Kristinwt/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

/Archive 1

Silly Rabbit - E dog95 05:26, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Swedish article about Jezper Söderlund

[edit]

You could create an article about Jezper Söderlund in Swedish in the Swedish Wikipedia at http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jezper_Söderlund --Eastmain 14:32, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. I was thinking about that. I don't know Swedish and BabelFish doesn't translate to Swedish. I could use French there, but English is getting to be pretty universal. I put an English one up. I figure I gotta let the Swedes do their own translating. I gave them a head start. Duh, forgot to create a login there before I pasted everything. Oh well. Kristinwt 05:03, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another oops, I only used his first name. Those umlauts really screw up an English Search. Do you know how to redirect? Could you redirect my Swedish Jezper page to your page you reference? I didn't see it until I'd already pasted. Kristinwt 05:06, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tags

[edit]

I don't know how to do tags, yet. I tried copying from other's pages, but it didn't work that easily. If you know me, you can edit and put some characteristics up in the form of those picture blocks.

Ha ha

[edit]

hi & welcome to Wikipedia! E_dog95' Hi ' 08:18, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe u could chime in here too? E_dog95' Hi ' 08:35, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Using the <ref> and </ref> tags

[edit]

Hi - here's a tidbit showing how to use these tags. You've been placing the opening <ref> tag correctly, but forgetting to "close out" the ref with the </ref> tag. That's why the end of the page disappears sometimes. The wiki software still thinks that it should be displaying a reference. Bye for now :D E_dog95' Hi ' 18:14, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can we provide the source for the tidbit you added? Other editors will need to verify the reference. For now, I've "commented out" the statement and its reference. We can re-add the material of course. E_dog95' Hi ' 06:27, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I emailed the tech guys. I don't want to post an email, nor have my address public on the Internet. Do you have a confidential place these things are kept? Otherwise I don't mind leaving it out.Kristinwt (talk) 04:04, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No hiding places...thanks :) E_dog95' Hi ' 10:26, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

10 rules, thank you.

[edit]

"God Almighty only gave us 10 rules! WP has gazillions." I am sure you are having an annoying time, but this comment gave me a chuckle, and I needed it (the vandals are frisky tonight, maybe because school starts back tomorrow). Thanks. :) And I am sorry about whatever the problem was :( (and I have no idea why Huggle made me look at it.) All the best! :) sinneed (talk)

Actually, God gave us 613 Commandments. But I nitpick. DS (talk) 19:58, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures?

[edit]

Do you have any Santa Cruz pics that we could use? E_dog95' Hi ' 06:35, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If I did they'd be photographs or negatives. I'd have to search in physical archives. Then of unknown quality since they would have been taken years ago. I might have a postcard to use for shared use. Don't want to commit right now. Kristinwt (talk) 06:42, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Thank you for contributing to the article. However, I reverted your good faith edit for the following reasons:

~Eric:71.20.250.51 (talk) 05:25, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Eric

[edit]

Can you fix that poem/ book link I don't think it was supposed to be a new entry but maybe a reference at the bottom of the page. And even if it was, couldn't it be left for someone to create a stub and make something out of it? I think of Wiki as collaborative. Not like I have to do it all. Do we slap babies because they don't walk upright? No there's a time to wait and watch them grow. I tried to write on your talk page, but it would not "take". It's not like a blog where you click a button and answer someone's post. Bah. WP is frustrating. Kristinwt (talk) 15:50, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I added WP:redlink and book citation for The Titanic (poem) to RMS Titanic in popular culture with this edit, and same for E. J. Pratt with this edit.  I hope this helps, ~Eric:71.20.250.51 (talk) 17:58, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:JamesBurke.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:JamesBurke.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 22:32, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Kristinwt. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:EmilePandolfiAlbum.gif

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EmilePandolfiAlbum.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:03, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Joel Fuhrman, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Alexbrn (talk) 06:09, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Fuhrman!

[edit]

Cheers! MaynardClark (talk) 01:55, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Kristinwt. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Kristinwt. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]