User talk:Kozmoscorner

January 2010

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article PetGadgets, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Teapotgeorge^Talk 19:41, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of PetGadgets

The article PetGadgets has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional garbage sourced to promotional garbage. Ref 1 is a promotional listicle supplied by PetGadgets, refs 2 and 3 are listicles of various gadgets for pets not content about the company, refs 4-6 and 9 are dead Google Drive links with no other details (article title? date?) cannot be verified and so cannot support a claim to notability, ref 7 won't load even on IA but from context looks like a fluff feature to fill news time, ref 8 is a dead blog, and 10 and 11 are just links to subsidiary sites owned by the company. None of this meets WP:CORPDEPTH, and I was not able to find anything that did when I searched, so WP:NCORP is not met.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:22, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]