User talk:Kousai orfahli

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Kousai orfahli/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Kousai orfahli/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 03:10, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kousai orfahli! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 03:10, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Kousai orfahli/sandbox

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Kousai orfahli/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 03:10, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:Kousai orfahli/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, User talk:Kousai orfahli/sandbox, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Yann (talk) 06:11, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kousai orfahli. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 23:36, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for your reply I admit I was making a mistake but I really did not had the well-knowing about the rules but I assure you now I'm full aware about the rules here so please can you re-consider about my case and thank you. Kousai orfahli (talk) 13:31, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kousai orfahli (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello I admin I was making a mistake by creating multiple accounts but I was not aware about the rules, but now I'm full-aware about the guidelines and rules in Wikipedia so I think the block is no longer necessary because I understand that I have been blocked for the misuse of multiple Wikipedia accounts and creating new accounts to avoid detection or sanctions etc.. but now I will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and I promise to make useful contributions instead so please re-consider about my account and you can delete any other accounts that belongs to me . thank you

Decline reason:

You didn't need to know the rules to know it was totally inappropriate to set up fake accounts to vote-stack in your favour. Come on now. Yamla (talk) 22:24, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: I admit what I did and I said I was wrong but I'm not stuped to make another mistake that can block my Ip address for a long time. I could make another wikipedia account but I do not want if you accept my request I will start again in Wikipedia and if you don't it's okay I will just leave . Kousai orfahli (talk) 22:59, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla Kousai orfahli (talk) 15:52, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will not lift your block, so please don't ping me again. However, you are free to make another unblock request and a different administrator will review it. --Yamla (talk) 16:45, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kousai orfahli (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I misused wikipedia once from a long time and it will not happened again it was a long time for that mistake I can start a new beginning if you allow me Kousai orfahli (talk) 10:49, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline, user hasn't responded to admin questions. Please create a new request if you still wish to appeal. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 12:46, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@NinjaRobotPirate:, could I have a CU check on this unblock request for our opening step? Nosebagbear (talk) 23:13, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- There's almost nothing non-stale to check, but there's nothing on the IP range he's most recently used. It looks like might have been some proxy use during the SPI case. It's tough to tell with some of these companies; they sell a lot of services. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:23, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Since Bbb23 is retired, I can't discuss the issue with the blocking admin. @NinjaRobotPirate: Are you, as a checkuser, willing to lift this checkuserblock? It seams to me that this user deserves unblocking per the WP:standard offer? Vanjagenije (talk) 23:36, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Half of his edits seem to be adding his own name to Wikipedia articles (Special:Diff/814015748, Special:Diff/932734326) or creating sandbox articles about himself. Kousai orfahli, what do you want to edit? You said you're going to "make useful contributions", but that's pretty vague. As far as I can tell, there wasn't anything more than the visible sock puppetry and vote stacking going on, so I guess it's fine if someone else wants to unblock the editor. But it would be nice to hear what he intends to edit, I think. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:04, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there ,I was using another account for editing and I created some articles there with this username (Hidar.ayube) because I messed up with this account so I left this and I want to delete it and continue with (Hidar.ayube) thank you for your time. Kousai orfahli (talk)

You are not allowed to edit with any account, because you (you, as a person) are blocked from editing Wikipedia. WP:Block evasion is not allowed, and if you try to use another account for editing, it will be blocked too.
It is not possible to delete an account, see WP:UNC. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:26, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kousai orfahli (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello it's been almost a year since this block but now I understand what I have been blocked for and ofcourse I will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and I promis that I will make useful contributions instead in the future . thank you.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 14:59, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.