User talk:Konsul28

April 2023

Hello, I'm MrOllie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. MrOllie (talk) 20:30, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 20:28, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrOllie (talk) 14:37, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I was only changing mistakes. Konsul28 (talk) 20:34, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Agile Project Management (book), you may be blocked from editing. MrOllie (talk) 21:19, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Process, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. MrOllie (talk) 12:39, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 12:25, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Last chance - please stop adding links to your essays. Sam Kuru (talk) 11:22, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Agile. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. MrOllie (talk) 12:25, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a place to spread your opinions, whether by spamming links to self published essays or by pasting such thoughts onto talk pages. Kindly stop. MrOllie (talk) 13:18, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 13:46, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS

UTRS appeal #97774 has been closed by an administrator, who told you to post any further unblock request here. If you do decide to do so, you should include in your unblock request an explanation of the relationship between this account and the account Marek Prasoł, and why you have used more than one account. JBW (talk) 20:29, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]