User talk:Knovevmber

Welcome

Hello, Knovevmber, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!Active Banana (talk) 04:36, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just rolled back your See Also additions to Guy Gamer (Fatal1ty and Dave Walsh). I think I may have been too hasty in labeling them as vandalism; however, they don't belong in this article because there is no clear connection--for example, in an article about Baseball Players, we wouldn't make See Also links to random sets of ballplayers. Sorry, though, for not assuming good faith. Qwyrxian (talk) 05:09, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 09:30, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ಠ_ಠ

"Douche canoe" is not acceptable language on Wikipedia. We Wikipedians have a strong aversion nonsensical pejoratives, next time could you consider using "douche nozzle" instead? In all seriousness, play nice. Brandon (talk) 10:35, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How Wikipedia Works

What you or any other editor "knows" is irrelevant. What matters is what reliable experts have published about a topic. Use focused searches on places like news.google.com books.google.com and scholar.google.com to find sourced content to support your claims and content you wish to see in articles. (note that most blog hits in news.google.com searches do not count as reliable sources]]) Active Banana (talk) 12:50, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Once a PROD is contested, that's it...move on. If you think it's deletable, start an WP:AFD. Anything else is disruptive editing. Actually, the article already has survived an AFD discussion, so it is not eligible for PROD by explicit process requirements regardless of how good your rationale is. No need for you to waste any further time with that approach. DMacks (talk) 05:38, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]