User talk:Brandon

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5	Archive 6
Archive 7	Archive 8	Archive 9
Archive 10	Archive 11	Archive 12
Archive 13	Archive 14

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Wow - I was going to leave a similar message to Brotherbog below - I hope this is the correct way to do so :) In addition, all the "MrEarlGray's" edits have a racial/religious dimension/bias. cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Josibald (talk • contribs) 00:19, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Brandon

Great Panda pic!

I was wondering if you could just keep an eye on shahid malik which you're semi-protecting. Some subtle but negative edits attempted. I've left a reasonable message on the relevant talk page but I'm a novice....

thank you.

Brotherblog (talk) 05:07, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wow - I was going to leave a similar message to Brotherbog below - I hope this is the correct way to do so :) In addition, all the "MrEarlGray's" edits have a racial/religious dimension/bias. cheers.

I think ive placed the message incorrectly but it relates to the page 'Shahid malik'. cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by Josibald (talk • contribs) 00:22, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pegasus edit

Hey I saw you undid my edit on the Pegasus spyware article and I'm not sure why. HYTEN CREW (talk) 13:23, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You changed the spelling of defense from American English to British English without explanation. Brandon (talk) 13:46, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you should have put that reason into the edit summary. That may also make reverts feel less rude/condescending. 103.219.194.134 (talk) 09:24, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

why would you say this HYTEN CREW (talk) 01:09, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nice panda bear

Thanks for cleaning up all that promotional content. They should put you on payroll for that. Drmies (talk) 03:06, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I genuinely appreciate the recognition. It normally comes from the marketing team I ran afoul of and is less polite. :) Brandon (talk) 04:42, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit conflict

Seems your edit (diff) accidentally deleted another's reply. – 2804:F1...17:EDFC (::/32) (talk) 18:54, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed it did, thank you for letting me know. It appears they already restored their comment, sorry about that NewBorders. Brandon (talk) 19:04, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine ^^ I suspected it was just an innocent mistake. Good day to you. NewBorders (talk) 19:05, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Filter Help

Hello,

I tried to add a relevant audio to Brighton, but a filter prohibited me from publishing my edit. Perhaps my edit summary was off-topic, but I do not intend to vandalize Wikipedia. How can we resolve this conflict?

Thank you Flame, not lame 💔 (Don't talk to me.) 13:27, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Seeking feedback about an edit request to the Cloudinary article

Hi @Brandon, I see you've made some edits to the Cloudinary article recently. I was hoping to get your feedback on a suggestion I've made to the intro paragraph. I think the opening sentence is weak since it only describes the company as a "SaaS technology company" and is front loaded with a list of cities with corporate offices. In my suggestion I've move the description of the technology up and bumped the cites to a second sentence since that information seems less important.

I'm a connected contributor and i've tagged the COI request for review, but I was hoping to get your thoughts since you're a recent contributor to the article. Thanks for the help and any feedback is appreciated.

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Cloudinary

Thanks! SBCornelius (talk) 21:00, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Certification on demand

I've added another source. What do you think? Bearian (talk) 06:04, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still not sure I understand the purpose of the article. "Certification on demand" seems to be a concept unique to qualified electronic signature and specifically mobile qualified electronic signature at that. Given mobile QES does not seem to be explained in any existing article, how about a redirect to qualified electronic signature? Brandon (talk) 23:17, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]