User talk:Soybean46

May 2022

Hello, I'm TheoCourt. I noticed that you recently removed content from Silesian Interurbans without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Theo (talk) 20:24, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Theo, replied on your talk page. Either respond here or on your page. Kmlbon (talk) 21:05, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Trams in Prague

Hi

Congratulations on your work on this page. Can I just clear up a minor point. In the historical section you refer to the two pairs of trams used for the centenary service as follows: "Their fleet numbers were 2210 together with the towing car 1202 and the pair 2110 with the towing car 1522." I assume this refers to tram and trailer combinations, if correct can you confirm which is the power car and which is the trailer in each pairing? Murgatroyd49 (talk) 16:22, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The first numbers are power cars with the latter numbers being the trailers. I appreciate all the cleanups, good to have a second pair of eyes. Kmlbon (talk) 16:25, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Murgatroyd49 (talk) 17:28, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Most – Litvínov Trams moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Most – Litvínov Trams, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx^Talk? 20:14, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will attempt to find references in Czech however it is unlikely there will be many references; at least I couldn't find much and it was a work in progress. I think your judgement has been too harsh in this instance. There are many articles on Wikipedia where references are widely available. The article is mainly a succinct translation from the Czech Wikipedia with context carefully checked, and could be judged as a Start Class article. I have added some references; the only ones I could find for the timebeing. Please reconsider, I have submitted the draft for review, and will amend the article with references when I can find them Kmlbon (talk) 20:58, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If there are no sources confirming a statement presented as a fact in an article, then it fails WP:V and should probably be removed. You had 8000+ bytes/850 words in that article, and not a single source. Sorry but draftifying that is nowhere near being harsh. You have submitted it for review with four sources. Although better than nothing, a majority of the draft is still unsourced. This also the same with Trams in Ostrava. The burden is on you to show references for material you add. Of course others can help you with that, but in this case, I don't speak a word Czech. If you are struggling to find sources, you can perhaps ask for help at WikiProject Czech Republic or the village pump on cswiki. However, I did find some English sources on the trams of Ostrava written by academics: [1], [2], which I'd strongly recommend using over shady websites. ~Styyx^Talk? 15:23, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are millions of current articles on Wikipedia that wouldn't pass WP:V and you want to remove a translated article that is a work in progress - what is your angle here? The only thing I can admit to not knowing is the Draft function! Kmlbon (talk) 15:31, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Trams in Plzeň moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Trams in Plzeň, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx^Talk? 20:22, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trams in Ostrava has been accepted

Trams in Ostrava, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:59, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Liberec-Jablonec tramway

Hi, I removed the PROD from the talk page, it doesn't belong there and deleting the article would not be appropriate in this case anyway. I advise you to simply create the new article and merge the content of Liberec-Jablonec tramway into it (assuming this idea has consensus), then replace the content of that article with a redirect to the other. This is necessary to preserve attribution in the page history. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 12:29, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks Kmlbon (talk) 12:56, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trams in Plzeň (June 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Trams in Plzeň and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Trams in Plzeň, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 06:02, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kmlbon! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gusfriend (talk) 06:02, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Kmlbon! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Trams in Ostrava, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Most-Litvinov Trams has been accepted

Most-Litvinov Trams, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Artem.G (talk) 16:51, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trams in Plzeň has been accepted

Trams in Plzeň, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 20:28, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited UEFA Euro 2024, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daniel Siebert. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:55, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, but please remember that Wikipedia isn't a place for walkthroughs, cheats, lists of game content or detailed instructions on how to play a game. For more information please read the video game guideline. Thank you. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 20:02, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Without proper coverage, there is no need for a long list of DLC and updates. The developer's own website is no reason for inclusion. And WP:WHATABOUTX is not an argument. The WP:BURDEN is on you. Please come up with reliable sources. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 20:04, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It kind of is! Why aren't you removing DLC content from the Cities Skylines page? Aren't those updates? Or do you lack understanding of the problem at hand? Or are you just unfair and lazy? Soybean46 (talk) 11:19, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 13:26, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again, you suggesting WP:WHATABOUTX is not an argument. Please refrain from making personal attacks. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 13:28, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced articles

Hi! I see that you recently created many articles without citing any sources. This shouldn't be done, as all articles should reference reliable sources, both to verify the claims they make and to show they pass the general notability guideline. If you want, Help:Referencing for beginners can be helpful. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 14:15, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, surely sources can be added as the article progresses? Soybean46 (talk) 14:17, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Things you write should be sourced. It is not the job of other editors in the future to source them "as the article progresses", especially when you are creating a large number of articles successively. Also, not having sources means new page reviewers can't know if your articles are fit for mainspace.

Writing one well-sourced article is more productive than 10 unsourced articles, and the latter can even become a burden on other editors and the encyclopedia. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 14:36, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rai Friuli Venezia Giulia moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Rai Friuli Venezia Giulia. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:12, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ČRo Vltava moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to ČRo Vltava. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:28, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Petőfi Rádió moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Petőfi Rádió. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tatra 607 Monopost has been accepted

Tatra 607 Monopost, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:49, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ČRo České Budějovice (October 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ČRo České Budějovice and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 13:09, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lee Burridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Travellers.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Soybean46. Thank you for your work on Tatra 607 Monopost. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:01, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paavo Siljamäki (November 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The sources aren't enough to satisfy WP:GNG, and it's not clear how this would meet WP:MUSICBIO either?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paavo Siljamäki and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:11, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Siljamaki was nominated for a Grammy with the Above & Beyond band, but not as a solo performer, necessarily, per WP:MUSICBIO. There is also no original research, whilst the references are scarce, I think this qualifies for at least a stub. Is there anything I can improve on? Soybean46 (talk) 15:17, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paavo Siljamäki (November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I share the concerns of the previous reviewer. This interview source is very detailed; the rest are are not.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paavo Siljamäki and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 01:33, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate the second opinion, I have nothing to add to the current draft, unless anyone else does Soybean46 (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]