User talk:Kknundy

Wikipedia–Wikimedia Meetup
Kolkata, India

Lede - aka lead section

Francis E Williams (talk) 20:30, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have transfered this discussion to the article talk page so that others may comment if you wish to establish concensus.Francis E Williams (talk) 15:04, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to WikiConference India 2011

Hi Kknundy,

The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011.
You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form.

But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach.

As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions.

We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

Invitation to Kolkata meetup

Wikipedia–Wikimedia Meetup
Kolkata, India

(view · edit · changes)

Hong Kong meetup 58

In the area? You're invited to
Hong Kong Meetup # 58

	Date: October 21
	Time: 7PM
	Place: Think Cafe, Unit B, 19/F, Kyoto Plaza, 491-499 Lockhart Road, Causeway Bay
prev: Meetup 57 - next: Meetup 59

SusanLai (talk) 05:13, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hong Kong meetup 59

In the area? You're invited to
Hong Kong Meetup # 59

	Date: November 18
	Time: 7PM
	Place: Think Cafe, Unit B, 19/F, Kyoto Plaza, 491-499 Lockhart Road, Causeway Bay
prev: Meetup 58 - next: Meetup 60

Hong Kong meetup 60

In the area? You're invited to
Hong Kong Meetup # 60

	Date: December 16
	Time: 7PM
	Place: Think Cafe, Unit B, 19/F, Kyoto Plaza, 491-499 Lockhart Road, Causeway Bay
prev: Meetup 59 - next: Meetup 61

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ISEET.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk or via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 03:57, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question for administrator

{{admin help}} I often edit Wikipedia from my university network. As it has a shared IP, I had requested a Global IP block exempt at Meta.wm.org and was granted it. However, since then I have changed universities, but the IP address situation is more or less identical. and while trying to edit a page, there is a message saying I can't edit because of an IP block. This seems to be counter-intuitive, as I have a global exempt. Please help me out so that I may contribute to my best capacity. Image of block message included here. I am not sure what the correct course of action is, so I used "admin help" instead of "unblock"

Thanks --Kknundy (talk) 09:58, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That range was blocked only yesterday as an open proxy. I have asked the blocking admin to comment. JohnCD (talk) 10:48, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. I'll keep an eye out. Kknundy (talk) 10:50, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The range block was targeted at users of the anonymox plugin (for Firefox probably). If you disable this plugin you should be able to edit again. If that is not an option, admins looking at IPBE should note that this user does not appear to be the intended target of the block, and I have no obvious objections to block exemption. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 11:08, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I do sometimes use the anonymoX plugin, albeit not on Wikipedia. There might have been some oversight on my part where I didn't disable it before an edit. I'll try to avoid it in the future, but is there a particular reason such a block exists for logged-in users? Kknundy (talk) 11:14, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately this wiki has massive problems with logged-in sockpuppets abusing anonymising proxies. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 11:19, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I see. That kind of makes sense. I would appreciate an option where I could bypass such blocks, if that isn't too much trouble, or doesn't cause any disruption. Personally though, I feel there are several other techniques for sockpuppets to abuse, and this block can cause more legitimate edits to be lost, than the help it results in.

Yes, we're also onto those other techniques :) This IP range block only affects anonymox users, so I'm going to assume that you are able to disable your anonymising proxy plugin, that you do not need to edit via an anonymising proxy, and that you are not restricted from editing via your normal IP address. Given these (non-negotiable) assumptions, I think you'll fall outside the criteria for block exemption on this wiki. However if you think you may still meet the requirements for block exemption after reading the policy, you're welcome to contact a checkuser with your request. You can find one on this page. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 17:05, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. I probably don't need the exempt now. If anything changes, I'll drop a request! Cheers Kknundy --(talk) 23:50, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ISEET concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ISEET, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:00, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission ISEET

Hello Kknundy. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled ISEET.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ISEET}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 00:00, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

IEEE technical societies

If you are a member of one or more of the IEEE technical societies, you may wish to identify yourself as such on Wikipedia. I’ve created Wikipedian categories for each of the 38 IEEE technical societies. The new Template:User IEEE member creates a userbox identifying the society and your membership grade and includes your user page in the relevant Wikipedian category. If you have any questions, feel free to drop me a note. Yours aye, Buaidh 18:57, 11 December 2013 (UTC) — IEEE Life Member[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Kknundy! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 23:55, Sunday, March 29, 2015 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lucas Sirkar (December 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kvng was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

[1] is the most WP:RELIABLE reference but lacks WP:SIGCOV

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lucas Sirkar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lucas Sirkar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Kvng (talk) 23:00, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kknundy! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~Kvng (talk) 23:00, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Lucas Sirkar concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Lucas Sirkar, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lucas Sirkar has been accepted

Lucas Sirkar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 03:15, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]