Jump to content

User talk:KingSteve032

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 2010

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Skittles (confectionery) worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 04:31, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Skittles (confectionery), even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:36, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Skittles (confectionery). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Stroppolotalk 04:52, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:53, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


As it has become apparent that your account will be used solely for unconstructive editing, you have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest it by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} to this page. Kuru (talk) 05:21, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KingSteve032 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The last one I did was the truth not unconstructive editing

Decline reason:

Nothing but vandalism from this account. --jpgordon::==( o ) 06:20, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KingSteve032 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am sorry for vandalizing the page and wont do it again promise

Decline reason:

Thank you; the block will help you keep your promise. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:21, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KingSteve032 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Come on I wont do it again please unblock me I was messing with a friend I was going to change it back later.

Decline reason:

"Messing with a friend" is not one of the goals of the Wikipedia project. Jayron32 05:54, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KingSteve032 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Look if I was a really a vandalizer would I keep trying to get unblock?

Decline reason:

Yes, so you could go back to it. We've had that happen — many times. Do parole boards release people just because they keep asking? Which, by the way, you're not going to be doing again as you've used up more than your quota of unblocks and the page will be protected so that we can concentrate on reviewing requests from people who might actually have a chance of getting unblocked. — Daniel Case (talk) 15:46, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.