User talk:Kindindubai

This is Kindindubai's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: KAMPOS Costa Smeralda (January 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MarioJump83 were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Appears to be mostly spam, needs to be redone to a proper article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:KAMPOS Costa Smeralda and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:KAMPOS Costa Smeralda, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mario Jump 83! 12:20, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kindindubai! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mario Jump 83! 12:20, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Hello, Kindindubai. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 12:38, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of swimwear brands have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of swimwear brands was changed by Kindindubai (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960707 on 2021-01-19T12:44:20+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:44, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.Deb (talk) 13:22, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kieran207 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Has reference errors.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Kindindubai/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Kindindubai/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kieran207(talk-Contribs) 15:17, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your conflict of interest

Are you saying you are not the person of the same name who was listed as a team member for KAMPOS? Deb (talk) 08:15, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I confirm you that my name is Sara Gentile and I was never listed as a team member for KAMPOS. I do not work for them and I have never worked for them.

Odd coincidence, isn't it? Why is it that you are only interested in creating articles for this company and nothing else? Deb (talk) 10:42, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Everyone has the freedom to contribute with the topic of his/her choice that he/she is passionate about. I am passionate about fashion and sustainability. I am currently learning and I believe it is a work progress to find the right tone of voice and understand/meet the requirements. I want to understand and make the right changes to the article I have started to write and I have also been contributing to other articles in the Wikipedia encyclopedia.

You're mistaken. We don't have the freedom to contribute with the topic of our own choice. For a start, the topic has to meet Wikipedia's notability criteria. We're also discouraged from writing articles on subjects that are too close to us - you shouldn't really be writing about a company you are "passionate" about. Furthermore, new editors like yourself are expected to begin by making small edits to existing articles rather than trying to create an article from scratch without first practising or understanding the guidelines. Deb (talk) 20:32, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Deb, I am offended by the tone and the content of your messages, as you are acting on behalf of Wikipedia. Your accusations and speculations are unfounded and have no evidence of what you are claiming. Moreover, I find your last message broadline discriminatory as I cannot be told which topics I should contribute to on Wikipedia. Also, statements like 'Are you saying you are not the person of the same name who was listed as a team member for KAMPOS?' or 'Odd coincidence, isn't it?' are offensive, abrasive and arrogant.

If Wikipedia has a concern about the identity of a user, the company should ask for a proof of identity rather than having employees/users accusing other users without any evidence.

I am ready to submit my ID document or any proof you might require to confirm my identity.

I reconfirm that I have no formal or informal relationship to KAMPOS.

If this issue is not resolved professionally, I am ready to escalate officially with Wikipedia because I cannot believe new users should be discouraged aggressively to contribute. I reserve the right to protect my interests.

Dear Wikipedia,

I acknowledge that no one has responded to my last message sent several days ago (please see above). I also acknowledge the fact that on 5th April at 11:52, Deb deleted my draft without responding to my questions and completely ignoring my position. I will escalate until this issue is resolved fairly.

I reserve the right to protect my interests.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Kindindubai/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Kindindubai/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:29, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing?

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Kindindubai, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Kindindubai|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 12:31, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Therodislong. I confirm I am not being paid to make any contribution on Wikipedia. I am still not familiar with Wikipedia and I am learning the tone of voice to use with time by creating this page and editing articles. I am contributing to the Wikipedia encyclopedia during my free time to grow the topic of fashion and sustainability that I am passionate about.