User talk:Kickzzz

Kickzzz, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Kickzzz! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Kickzzz. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor (talk) 19:13, 30 March 2021 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Max Polyakov has been accepted

Max Polyakov, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 00:38, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Max Polyakov conflict of interest

Hello, Kickzzz. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Max Polyakov, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. All of your edit history has been about Max Polyakov. Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's policies about conflict-of-interest editing. "COI editors are strongly discouraged from editing affected articles directly, and can propose changes on article talk pages instead."--Sunderlandweary (talk) 13:26, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

issues with your actions

Hello, You have violated Wikipedia's policies and procedures on two fronts: refusal to disclose a conflict of interest and deletion of text that is not allowed under Wikipeida's policies.

conflict of interest

You did not address the conflict of interest message that was posted to your talk page. You are not allowed to edit Max Polyakov while refusing to disclose your relationship with the subject. It is not believable that you are a true volunteer Wikipedia editor who just so happens to be interested in a random Ukrainian businessman. No, you are either the subject himself or are acting on his behalf. You must disclose that.

false removal of text from Max Polyakov

On June 21, you deleted text that was properly added to the Max Polyakov article. Your edit summary that you wrote said "Removed uncited controversies tab added by the activist editor Sunderlandweary." This is a lie. The section was properly cited. The introductory sentence to the section, which is a summary of the section, does not need to have a citation. However, all the content in that section was cited. If you don't believe this, you can view it for yourself right here: https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Max_Polyakov&oldid=1029030656. Please do not remove text on Wikipedia articles that follows Wikipedia's policies and procedures. And please do not lie in your edit summaries. Every article on Wikipedia must reflect all the information that reliable sources have written about that subject. Therefore, the text you deleted will be going back onto the article. Do not remove it. --Sunderlandweary (talk) 13:48, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]