User talk:Khidrana Singh

Welcome!

Hello, Khidrana Singh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Shabeg Singh does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 13:34, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Kautilya3 (talk) 16:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on 1986 Proposed Anti-Sikh Genocide

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 1986 Proposed Anti-Sikh Genocide, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:54, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sangat Singh Bangesar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengali. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Please stop moving Sikh articles to new names without discussion

You have been moving Sikh article titles to new names with absolutely no discussion or consensus. I will be reverting all of these controversial moves. ThethPunjabi (talk) 03:18, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Khidrana Singh,

I came here to comment about the same thing. You are moving too many articles to different page titles based on your personal opinion. Moving articles to a different, more suitable page title should be uncontroversial. If anyone objects, and as you can see, someone has, you need to discuss your proposed article page move on the article talk page. Persistent moving of articles around can result in a loss of editing privileges so please remember this is a collaborative editing project and you are just one editor. Your opinion counts but so does every other editor's on the project. Work together, not against each other.

If you have questions about page moves or Wikipedia policies, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:58, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gonda Gopal

The article Gonda Gopal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article has no reliable sources to support it aside from a digitized OCR recreation of an entry found within Harbans Singh's 'The Encyclopedia of Sikhism'. Also, this article was likely created by a sockpuppet account (investigation pending).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ThethPunjabi (talk) 03:58, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Kandu Khera Incident for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kandu Khera Incident is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kandu Khera Incident until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 06:32, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

You have recently made edits related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. This is a standard message to inform you that India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 06:39, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kandu Khera Incident

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Kandu Khera Incident, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. El Wikipedian (talk) 10:38, 23 July 2023 (UTC)