User talk:Khannon1

Khannon1, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Khannon1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sue Anstiss (November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TipsyElephant were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Citing homepages to various websites associated with the person, especially when the homepage doesn't even mention the person, is not helpful so please avoid doing that in the future. Please do not include links to external websites in the body of the article per Wikipedia:External links. It looks like Sue probably passes WP:BIO or WP:GNG, but the current sourcing almost exclusively falls into what would be considered WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS. Please provide two to three WP:RELIABLE sources that discuss who Sue Anstiss is in some depth (i.e. two to three paragraphs about Sue). Keep in mind that every statement needs to be WP:VERIFIABLE.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sue Anstiss and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sue Anstiss, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TipsyElephant (talk) 13:00, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft Notes

Hello Khannon1, sorry I declined your draft. I know that can be discouraging. I noticed that Draft:Sue Anstiss is the only page you've worked on and thought I should maybe mention a few policies that could be relevant. If you have any personal connection to Sue Anstiss you should probably read WP:COI and WP:PROMOTIONAL. If you need further assistance feel free to leave a message on my talk page or ask at the teahouse. TipsyElephant (talk) 13:08, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disclosures

Hi Khannon1. I have fixed the disclosure you put into Draft:Sue Anstiss. {{Connected contributor}} is meant for the article's talk page instead of the main body. And in this case, the actual one to use is {{Connected contributor (paid)}}. I have made this adjustment and you can see the results at Draft talk:Sue Anstiss. In addition, I have placed the {{paid}} template on your userpage (User:Khannon1). Please have a look and if you have any questions, let me know. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:56, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sue Anstiss (January 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TipsyElephant were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia pages are required to have WP:INDEPENDENT and WP:RELIABLE secondary sources that discuss the subject in some depth. Please cite a few sources that are not press releases, interviews, or self-published articles before resubmitting the draft. Please provide sources for any tagged sentences or remove the statements before resubmitting the draft. My previous comment was not fully addressed before the draft was re-submitted.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sue Anstiss and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sue Anstiss, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TipsyElephant (talk) 15:58, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sue Anstiss

Hello, Khannon1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sue Anstiss, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sue Anstiss

Hello, Khannon1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sue Anstiss".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:42, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]