Jump to content

User talk:Begonia Brandbygeana

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Trout this user
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Kgeee65)

Begonia Brandbygeana (talk · contribs)

I'm not sure I understand why you changed the speedy deletion tag on this user page. While your edit comment says "this username is only a person, not a group", it doesn't matter if it's a person or a group under the db-spamuser tag. The reason for tagging as I did was that the person who's name matches the username is being promoted on that user page. A person can be promoted as a product in the same way a company or group can be. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 10:40, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes a person can be promoted with a username that matches the person being promoted, however realnames aren't a violation of the username policy so aren't blocked as spam. Begonia Brandbygeana (talk) 10:55, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please make some changes

[edit]

Hi, Recently i got a notification that you have reviewed my newly created article Plants vs. Zombies 2: It's about time. Is everything allright ?

If your answer is no, then you are permited by me (the creator) to edit that article.

If you have any queries feel free to ask me.

You can also contact me on my talk page. Himanis Das   talk  17:11, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Everything's all right as far as I can see. Begonia Brandbygeana (talk) 17:14, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A bowl of strawberries for you!

[edit]
Thank you for reverting the vandalism to Natalie Holt. Launchballer 13:48, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Florencio (disambiguation)

[edit]

Hello Begonia Brandbygeana. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Florencio (disambiguation), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not uncontroversial maintenance. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 01:42, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New deal for page patrollers

[edit]

Hi Begonia Brandbygeana,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Db-spamuser-sandbox

[edit]

Template:Db-spamuser-sandbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — Train2104 (t • c) 01:01, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Begonia Brandbygeana. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:National Animation and Design Centre.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89(T·C) 04:31, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


I have made some additions to your work. Do you have access to any other sources? I would like to learn more about this forgotten outfit. ''Paul, in Saudi'' (talk) 11:01, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Pol pol- a village in palamau district of jharkhand" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Pol pol- a village in palamau district of jharkhand. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 12#Pol pol- a village in palamau district of jharkhand until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. dudhhrContribs 07:31, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Template:Station-stub has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 3 § Template:Station-stub until a consensus is reached. From Bassie f (his talk page) 07:12, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Template:Station-stub requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at [[https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Stub_types_for_deletion/Log/Deleted/June_2005#

{{Template disambiguation}} shouldn't be transcluded in the talk namespaces.

{{Station-stub}} may refer to:

See also

[edit]

{{disambiguation}}_→_

_/_Category:Station_stubs]]. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. From Bassie f (his talk page) 20:23, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]